Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Hao Wei 0006
dblp:96/133-6
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0009-4899-6058ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Representation and self-supervised learning · 61% Learning paradigms · 30% Graph learning · 9% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
contrastive learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | CaliGCL: Calibrated Graph Contrastive Learning via Partitioned Similarity and Consistency Discrimination · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › contrastive learning
graph contrastive learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | CaliGCL: Calibrated Graph Contrastive Learning via Partitioned Similarity and Consistency Discrimination · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › multi-label classification
multi-view multi-label classification |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Multi-View Multi-Label Classification via View-Label Matching Selection · AAAI 2025 |
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph neural network |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Multi-View Multi-Label Classification via View-Label Matching Selection · AAAI 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
weighted cross-entropy loss · 0.9view-label matching · 0.9semantics-consistency discriminator · 0.9graph network · 0.9exponential partitioned similarity · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Multi-View Multi-Label Classification via View-Label Matching SelectionabstractIn multi-view multi-label classification (MVML), each object is described by several heterogeneous views while annotated with multiple related labels. The key to learn from such complicate data lies in how to fuse cross-view features and explore multi-label correlations, while accordingly obtain correct assignments between each object and its corresponding labels. In this paper, we proposed an advanced MVML method named VAMS, which treats each object as a bag of views and reformulates the task of MVML as a “view-label” matching selection problem. Specifically, we first construct an object graph and a label graph respectively. In the object graph, nodes represent the multi-view representation of an object, and each view node is connected to its K-nearest neighbor within its own view. In the label graph, nodes represent the semantic representation of a label. Then, we connect each view node with all labels to generate the unified “view-label” matching graph. Afterwards, a graph network block is introduced to aggregate and update all nodes and edges on the matching graph, and further generating a structural representation that fuses multi-view heterogeneity and multi-label correlations for each view and label. Finally, we derive a prediction score for each view-label matching and select the optimal matching via optimizing a weighted cross-entropy loss. Extensive results on various datasets have verified that our proposed VAMS can achieve superior or comparable performance against state-of-the-art methods. Hao Wei 0006, Yongjian Deng, Qiuru Hai, Yuena Lin, Zhen Yang 0004, Gengyu Lyu |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2025 | CaliGCL: Calibrated Graph Contrastive Learning via Partitioned Similarity and Consistency DiscriminationabstractGraph contrastive learning (GCL) aims to learn self-supervised representations by distinguishing positive and negative sample pairs generated from multiple augmented graph views. Despite showing promising performance, GCL still suffers from two critical biases: (1) ***Similarity estimation bias*** arises when feature elements that support positive pair alignment are suppressed by conflicting components within the representation, causing truly positive pairs to appear less similar. (2) ***Semantic shift bias*** occurs when random augmentations alter the underlying semantics of samples, leading to incorrect positive or negative assignments and injecting noise into training. To address these issues, we propose CaliGCL, a GCL model for calibrating the biases by integrating an exponential partitioned similarity measure and a semantics-consistency discriminator. The exponential partitioned similarity computes the similarities among fine-grained partitions obtained through splitting representation vectors and uses exponential scaling to emphasize aligned (positive) partitions while reducing the influence of misaligned (negative) ones. The discriminator dynamically identifies whether augmented sample pairs maintain semantic consistency, enabling correction of misleading contrastive supervision signals. These components jointly reduce biases in similarity estimation and sample pairing, guiding the encoder to learn more robust and semantically meaningful representations. Extensive experiments on multiple benchmarks show that CaliGCL effectively mitigates both types of biases and achieves state-of-the-art performance. Yuena Lin, Hao Wei 0006, Hai-Chun Cai, Bohang Sun, Zhen Yang 0004, Gengyu Lyu |
NeurIPS | 2 |