Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

T. Dale Roberts

dblp:96/4205 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2002
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Systems, architecture and hardware · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
1 paper
Network optimization and economics · 75% Internet architecture and protocols · 25%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Network optimization and economics › resource allocation
capacity allocation
0.012000
Continuous Learning Automata Solutions to the Capacity Assignment Problem · IEEE Trans. Computers 2000
Network optimization and economics
network design
0.012000
Continuous Learning Automata Solutions to the Capacity Assignment Problem · IEEE Trans. Computers 2000
Internet architecture and protocols › quality of service
priority traffic
0.012000
Continuous Learning Automata Solutions to the Capacity Assignment Problem · IEEE Trans. Computers 2000
Network optimization and economics
resource allocation
0.012000
Continuous Learning Automata Solutions to the Capacity Assignment Problem · IEEE Trans. Computers 2000

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

simulated annealing · 0.0continuous learning automata · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2002 Discretized learning automata solutions to the capacity assignment problem for prioritized networks
abstract
We present a discretized learning automaton (LA) solution to the capacity assignment (CA) problem which focuses on finding the best possible set of capacities for the links that satisfy the traffic requirements in a prioritized network while minimizing the cost. Most approaches consider a single class of packets flowing through the network, but in reality, different classes of packets with different average packet lengths and different priorities are transmitted over the networks. This generalized model is the focus of this paper. Although the problem is inherently NP-hard, a few approximate solutions have been proposed in the literature. Marayuma and Tang (1977) proposed a single algorithm composed of several elementary heuristic procedures. Other solutions tackle the problem by using modern-day artificial intelligence (AI) paradigms such as simulated annealing and genetic algorithms (GAs). In 2000, we introduced a new method, superior to these, that uses continuous LA. In this paper, we present a discretized LA solution to the problem. This solution uses a meta-action philosophy new to the field of LA, and is probably the best available solution to this extremely complex problem.
B. John Oommen, T. Dale Roberts
IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part B2
2000 Continuous Learning Automata Solutions to the Capacity Assignment Problem
abstract
The Capacity Assignment (CA) problem focuses on finding the best possible set of capacities for the links that satisfies the traffic requirements in a prioritized network while minimizing the cost. Most approaches consider a single class of packets flowing through the network, but, in reality, different classes of packets with different packet lengths and priorities are transmitted over the networks. In this paper, we assume that the traffic consists of different classes of packets with different average packet lengths and priorities. We shall look at three different solutions to this problem. K. Marayuma and D.T. Tang (1977) proposed a single algorithm composed of several elementary heuristic procedures. A. Levi and C. Ersoy (1994) introduced a simulated annealing approach that produced substantially better results. In this paper, we introduce a new method which uses continuous learning automata to solve the problem. Our new schemes produce superior results when compared with either of the previous solutions and is, to our knowledge, currently the best known solution.
B. John Oommen, T. Dale Roberts
IEEE Trans. Computers2
1999 On Solving the Capacity Assignment Problem Using Continous Learning Automata
B. John Oommen, T. Dale Roberts
IEA/AIE2