Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Rui Li 0083

dblp:96/4282-83 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2008
—ORCID · conflict

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 first-authorComputer networks · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data mining · 67% Information retrieval · 33%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Data mining › feature engineering
compound feature generation
0.112005
Coevolutionary feature synthesized EM algorithm for image retrieval · ACM Multimedia 2005
Information retrieval › image retrieval
content-based image retrieval
0.112005
Coevolutionary feature synthesized EM algorithm for image retrieval · ACM Multimedia 2005
Data mining
expectation-maximization
0.112005
Coevolutionary feature synthesized EM algorithm for image retrieval · ACM Multimedia 2005

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

support vector machine · 0.1expectation-maximization · 0.1coevolutionary genetic programming · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2008 Feature synthesized EM algorithm for image retrieval
abstract
As a commonly used unsupervised learning algorithm in Content-Based Image Retrieval (CBIR), Expectation-Maximization (EM) algorithm has several limitations, including the curse of dimensionality and the convergence at a local maximum. In this article, we propose a novel learning approach, namely Coevolutionary Feature Synthesized Expectation-Maximization (CFS-EM), to address the above problems. The CFS-EM is a hybrid of coevolutionary genetic programming (CGP) and EM algorithm applied on partially labeled data. CFS-EM is especially suitable for image retrieval because the images can be searched in the synthesized low-dimensional feature space, while a kernel-based method has to make classification computation in the original high-dimensional space. Experiments on real image databases show that CFS-EM outperforms Radial Basis Function Support Vector Machine (RBF-SVM), CGP, Discriminant-EM (D-EM) and Transductive-SVM (TSVM) in the sense of classification performance and it is computationally more efficient than RBF-SVM in the query phase.
Rui Li 0083, Bir Bhanu, Anlei Dong
ACM Trans. Multim. Comput. Commun. Appl.1
2007 Hybrid coevolutionary algorithms vs. SVM algorithms
abstract
As a learning method support vector machine is regarded as one of the best classifiers with a strong mathematical foundation. On the other hand, evolutionary computational technique is characterized as a soft computing learning method with its roots in the theory of evolution. During the past decade, SVM has been commonly used as a classifier for various applications. The evolutionary computation has also attracted a lot of attention in pattern recognition and has shown significant performance improvement on a variety of applications. However, there has been no comparison of the two methods. In this paper, first we propose an improvement of a coevolutionary computational classification algorithm, called Improved Coevolutionary Feature Synthesized EM (I-CFS-EM) algorithm. It is a hybrid of coevolutionary genetic programming and EM algorithm applied on partially labeled data. It requires less labeled data and it makes the test in a lower dimension, which speeds up the testing. Then, we provide a comprehensive comparison between SVM with different kernel functions and I-CFS-EM on several real datasets. This comparison shows that I-CFS-EM outperforms SVM in the sense of both the classification performance and the computational efficiency in the testing phase. We also give an intensive analysis of the pros and cons of both approaches.
Rui Li 0083, Bir Bhanu, Krzysztof Krawiec
GECCO1
2007 On the number of subpopulations in coevolutionary computation: a database application
abstract
Among the existing feature selection/synthesis approaches, Coevolutionary Feature Synthesis (CFS) based on Coevolutionary Genetic Programming (CGP) has shown good performance on a variety of applications. In this paper, we propose an MDL-based fitness function to help pick a reasonable number of synthesized features which is equal to the number of subpopulations. It naturally balances the feature transformation complexity and classification performance. Experiments on a real image database show that the new fitness function solves the problem quite well.al.
Rui Li 0083, Bir Bhanu, Krzysztof Krawiec
GECCO1
2005 Coevolutionary feature synthesized EM algorithm for image retrieval
abstract
As a commonly used unsupervised learning algorithm in Content-Based Image Retrieval (CBIR), Expectation-Maximization (EM) algorithm has several limitations, especially in high dimensional feature spaces where the data are limited and the computational cost varies exponentially with the number of feature dimensions. Moreover, the convergence is guaranteed only at a local maximum. In this paper, we propose a unified framework of a novel learning approach, namely Coevolutionary Feature Synthesized Expectation-Maximization (CFS-EM), to achieve satisfactory learning in spite of these difficulties. The CFS-EM is a hybrid of coevolutionary genetic programming (CGP) and EM algorithm. The advantages of CFS-EM are: 1) it synthesizes low-dimensional features based on CGP algorithm, which yields near optimal nonlinear transformation and classification precision comparable to kernel methods such as the support vector machine (SVM); 2) the explicitness of feature transformation is especially suitable for image retrieval because the images can be searched in the synthesized low-dimensional space, while kernel-based methods have to make classification computation in the original high-dimensional space; 3) the unlabeled data can be boosted with the help of the class distribution learning using CGP feature synthesis approach. Experimental results show that CFS-EM outperforms pure EM and CGP alone, and is comparable to SVM in the sense of classification. It is computationally more efficient than SVM in query phase. Moreover, it has a high likelihood that it will jump out of a local maximum to provide near optimal results and a better estimation of parameters.
Rui Li 0083, Bir Bhanu, Anlei Dong
ACM Multimedia1