Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Shimin Cui
dblp:96/4374
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 3
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Compilers and program optimization · 77% Program analysis · 23% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Memory systems · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Compilers and program optimization › memory optimization
data layout optimization |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Forma: A framework for safe automatic array reshaping · ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst. 2007 |
Memory systems
data locality |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Forma: A framework for safe automatic array reshaping · ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst. 2007 |
Program analysis › static analysis
pointer analysis |
0.0 | 1 | 2007 | Forma: A framework for safe automatic array reshaping · ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst. 2007 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
field-sensitive alias analysis · 0.1data type checking · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | SafeType: detecting type violations for type-basedalias analysis of CabstractSummary To improve the ability of compilers to determine alias relations in a program, the C standard restricts the types of expressions that may access objects in memory. In practice, however, many existing C programs do not conform to these restrictions, making type‐based alias analysis unsound for those programs. As a result, type‐based alias analysis is frequently disabled. Existing approaches for verifying type safety exist within larger frameworks designed to verify overall memory safety, requiring both static analysis and runtime checks. This paper describes the motivation for analyzing the safety of type‐based alias analysis independently; presents SafeType, a purely static approach to detection of violations of the C standard's restrictions on memory accesses; describes an implementation of SafeType in the IBM XL C compiler, with flow‐sensitive and context‐sensitive queries to handle variables with typevoid *; evaluates that implementation, showing that it scales to programs with hundreds of thousands of lines of code; and uses SafeType to identify a previously unreported violation in the470.lbmbenchmark in SPEC CPU2006. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Iain Ireland, José Nelson Amaral, Raúl Silvera, Shimin Cui |
Softw. Pract. Exp. | 4 |
| 2008 | MPADS: memory-pooling-assisted data splittingabstractThis paper describes Memory-Pooling-Assisted Data Splitting (MPADS), a framework that combines data structure splitting with memory pooling --- Although it MPADS may call to mind memory padding, a distintion of this framework is that is does not insert padding. MPADS relies on pointer analysis to ensure that splitting is safe and applicable to type-unsafe language. MPADS makes no assumption about type safety. The analysis can identify cases in which the transformation could lead to incorrect code and thus MPADS abandons those cases. Stephen Curial, José Nelson Amaral, Yaoqing Gao, Shimin Cui, Raúl Silvera, Roch Archambault |
ISMM | 5 |
| 2007 | Forma: A framework for safe automatic array reshapingabstractThis article presents Forma , a practical, safe, and automatic data reshaping framework that reorganizes arrays to improve data locality. Forma splits large aggregated data-types into smaller ones to improve data locality. Arrays of these large data types are then replaced by multiple arrays of the smaller types. These new arrays form natural data streams that have smaller memory footprints, better locality, and are more suitable for hardware stream prefetching. Forma consists of a field-sensitive alias analyzer, a data type checker, a portable structure reshaping planner, and an array reshaper. An extensive experimental study compares different data reshaping strategies in two dimensions: (1) how the data structure is split into smaller ones ( maximal partition × frequency-based partition × affinity-based partition ); and (2) how partitioned arrays are linked to preserve program semantics ( address arithmetic-based reshaping × pointer-based reshaping ). This study exposes important characteristics of array reshaping. First, a practical data reshaper needs not only an inter-procedural analysis but also a data-type checker to make sure that array reshaping is safe. Second, the performance improvement due to array reshaping can be dramatic: standard benchmarks can run up to 2.1 times faster after array reshaping. Array reshaping may also result in some performance degradation for certain benchmarks. An extensive micro-architecture-level performance study identifies the causes for this degradation. Third, the seemingly naive maximal partition achieves best or close-to-best performance in the benchmarks studied. This article presents an analysis that explains this surprising result. Finally, address-arithmetic-based reshaping always performs better than its pointer-based counterpart. Shimin Cui, Yaoqing Gao, Raúl Silvera, José Nelson Amaral |
ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst. | 2 |