David K. Elson

dblp:96/5261 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
9ranked-venue papers
5as first author
0since 2021 · last 2013
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 5 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Information extraction and text analysis · 70% Speech recognition and synthesis · 30%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Information retrieval · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › relation extraction
quotation attribution
0.112010
Automatic Attribution of Quoted Speech in Literary Narrative · AAAI 2010
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › relation extraction
social network extraction
0.112010
Extracting Social Networks from Literary Fiction · ACL 2010
Natural language and speech › Speech recognition and synthesis › speaker recognition
speaker identification
0.112010
Automatic Attribution of Quoted Speech in Literary Narrative · AAAI 2010
Information retrieval › text summarization
multi-document summarization
0.112005
Do summaries help? · SIGIR 2005
Information retrieval
text summarization
0.112005
Do summaries help? · SIGIR 2005

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

statistical learning · 0.1social network extraction · 0.1rule-based methods · 0.1user study · 0.1task-based evaluation · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2013 Generating Different Story Tellings from Semantic Representations of Narrative
Elena Rishes, Stephanie M. Lukin, David K. Elson, Marilyn A. Walker
ICIDS3
2010 Automatic Attribution of Quoted Speech in Literary Narrative
abstract
We describe a method for identifying the speakers of quoted speech in natural-language textual stories. We have assembled a corpus of more than 3,000 quotations, whose speakers (if any) are manually identified, from a collection of 19th and 20th century literature by six authors. Using rule-based and statistical learning, our method identifies candidate characters, determines their genders, and attributes each quote to the most likely speaker. We divide the quotes into syntactic classes in order to leverage common discourse patterns, which enable rapid attribution for many quotes. We apply learning algorithms to the remainder and achieve an overall accuracy of 83%.
David K. Elson, Kathy McKeown
AAAI1
2010 Extracting Social Networks from Literary Fiction
David K. Elson, Nicholas Dames, Kathy McKeown
ACL1
2010 Tense and Aspect Assignment in Narrative Discourse
David K. Elson, Kathy McKeown
INLG1
2010 Building a Bank of Semantically Encoded Narratives
David K. Elson, Kathy McKeown
LREC1
2006 CLiMB ToolKit: A Case Study of Iterative Evaluation in a Multidisciplinary Project
Rebecca J. Passonneau, Roberta Blitz, David K. Elson, Angela Giral, Judith L. Klavans
LREC3
2005 Do summaries help?
abstract
We describe a task-based evaluation to determine whether multi-document summaries measurably improve user performance whe using online news browsing systems for directed research. We evaluated the multi-document summaries generated by Newsblaster, a robust news browsing system that clusters online news articles and summarizes multiple articles on each event. Four groups of subjects were asked to perform the same time-restricted fact-gathering tasks, reading news under different conditions: no summaries at all, single sentence summaries drawn from one of the articles, Newsblaster multi-document summaries, and human summaries. Our results show that, in comparison to source documents only, the quality of reports assembled using Newsblaster summaries was significantly better and user satisfaction was higher with both Newsblaster and human summaries.
Kathy McKeown, Rebecca J. Passonneau, David K. Elson, Ani Nenkova, Julia Hirschberg
SIGIR3
2004 Categorization of Narrative Semantics for Use in Generative Multidocument Summarization
David K. Elson
INLG1
2003 Columbia's Newsblaster: New Features and Future Directions
Kathy McKeown, Regina Barzilay, David K. Elson, David Kirk Evans, Judith L. Klavans, Ani Nenkova, Barry Schiffman, Sergey Sigelman
HLT-NAACL4