Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Anna Krasnyanskaya

dblp:96/6622 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2006
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Speech recognition and synthesis · 67% Information extraction and text analysis · 33%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Speech recognition and synthesis › spoken language understanding
speech parsing
0.112006
PCFGs with Syntactic and Prosodic Indicators of Speech Repairs · ACL 2006
Natural language and speech › Speech recognition and synthesis › spontaneous speech processing
speech repair detection
0.112006
PCFGs with Syntactic and Prosodic Indicators of Speech Repairs · ACL 2006
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
syntactic parsing
0.112006
PCFGs with Syntactic and Prosodic Indicators of Speech Repairs · ACL 2006

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

decision tree ensemble · 0.1PCFG · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2006 PCFGs with Syntactic and Prosodic Indicators of Speech Repairs
abstract
A grammatical method of combining two kinds of speech repair cues is presented. One cue, prosodic disjuncture, is detected by a decision tree-based ensemble classifier that uses acoustic cues to identify where normal prosody seems to be interrupted (Lickley, 1996). The other cue, syntactic parallelism, codifies the expectation that repairs continue a syntactic category that was left unfinished in the reparandum (Levelt, 1983). The two cues are combined in a Treebank PCFG whose states are split using a few simple tree transformations. Parsing performance on the Switchboard and Fisher corpora suggests that these two cues help to locate speech repairs in a synergistic way.
John Hale, Izhak Shafran, Lisa Yung, Bonnie J. Dorr, Mary P. Harper, Anna Krasnyanskaya, Matthew Lease, Yang Liu 0004, Brian Roark, Matthew G. Snover, Robin Stewart
ACL6
2006 Reranking for Sentence Boundary Detection in Conversational Speech
abstract
We present a reranking approach to sentence-like unit (SU) boundary detection, one of the EARS metadata extraction tasks. Techniques for generating relatively small n-best lists with high oracle accuracy are presented. For each candidate, features are derived from a range of information sources, including the output of a number of parsers. Our approach yields significant improvements over the best performing system from the NIST RT-04F community evaluation
Brian Roark, Yang Liu 0004, Mary P. Harper, Robin Stewart, Matthew Lease, Matthew G. Snover, Izhak Shafran, Bonnie J. Dorr, John Hale, Anna Krasnyanskaya, Lisa Yung
ICASSP (1)10
2006 SParseval: Evaluation Metrics for Parsing Speech
Brian Roark, Mary P. Harper, Eugene Charniak, Bonnie J. Dorr, Mark Johnson 0001, Jeremy G. Kahn, Yang Liu 0004, Mari Ostendorf, John Hale, Anna Krasnyanskaya, Matthew Lease, Izhak Shafran, Matthew G. Snover, Robin Stewart, Lisa Yung
LREC10