Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Andrew L. Maas
dblp:97/1011
· DBLP profile ↗
8ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 4 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Reinforcement learning · 33% Information extraction and text analysis · 25% Representation and self-supervised learning · 25% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Computational social science and digital humanities · 75% Smart cities and intelligent transportation · 25% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computational social science and digital humanities › social media analysis
sentiment analysis |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Sentiment expression conditioned by affective transitions and social forces · KDD 2014 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
sentiment analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Learning Word Vectors for Sentiment Analysis · ACL 2011 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › word representation
word representation learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Learning Word Vectors for Sentiment Analysis · ACL 2011 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › imitation learning
inverse reinforcement learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Maximum Entropy Inverse Reinforcement Learning · AAAI 2008 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › imitation learning › inverse reinforcement learning
maximum entropy inverse reinforcement learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Maximum Entropy Inverse Reinforcement Learning · AAAI 2008 |
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › mobile robot navigation
route inference |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Navigate like a cabbie: probabilistic reasoning from observed context-aware behavior · UbiComp 2008 |
Smart cities and intelligent transportation › route planning
route recommendation |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Navigate like a cabbie: probabilistic reasoning from observed context-aware behavior · UbiComp 2008 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
probabilistic reasoning · 0.2inverse reinforcement learning · 0.2statistical modeling · 0.2word embeddings · 0.1maximum entropy · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | Retrofitting Distributional Embeddings to Knowledge Graphs with Functional RelationsabstractKnowledge graphs are a versatile framework to encode richly structured data relationships, but it can be challenging to combine these graphs with unstructured data. Methods for retrofitting pre-trained entity representations to the structure of a knowledge graph typically assume that entities are embedded in a connected space and that relations imply similarity. However, useful knowledge graphs often contain diverse entities and relations (with potentially disjoint underlying corpora) which do not accord with these assumptions. To overcome these limitations, we present Functional Retrofitting, a framework that generalizes current retrofitting methods by explicitly modeling pairwise relations. Our framework can directly incorporate a variety of pairwise penalty functions previously developed for knowledge graph completion. Further, it allows users to encode, learn, and extract information about relation semantics. We present both linear and neural instantiations of the framework. Functional Retrofitting significantly outperforms existing retrofitting methods on complex knowledge graphs and loses no accuracy on simpler graphs (in which relations do imply similarity). Finally, we demonstrate the utility of the framework by predicting new drug–disease treatment pairs in a large, complex health knowledge graph. Benjamin J. Lengerich, Andrew L. Maas, Christopher Potts |
COLING | 2 |
| 2017 | Building DNN acoustic models for large vocabulary speech recognition
Andrew L. Maas, Peng Qi 0003, Ziang Xie, Awni Y. Hannun, Christopher T. Lengerich, Daniel Jurafsky, Andrew Y. Ng |
Comput. Speech Lang. | 1 |
| 2015 | Lexicon-Free Conversational Speech Recognition with Neural NetworksabstractWe present an approach to speech recognition that uses only a neural network to map acoustic input to characters, a character-level language model, and a beam search decoding procedure.This approach eliminates much of the complex infrastructure of modern speech recognition systems, making it possible to directly train a speech recognizer using errors generated by spoken language understanding tasks.The system naturally handles out of vocabulary words and spoken word fragments.We demonstrate our approach using the challenging Switchboard telephone conversation transcription task, achieving a word error rate competitive with existing baseline systems.To our knowledge, this is the first entirely neural-network-based system to achieve strong speech transcription results on a conversational speech task.We analyze qualitative differences between transcriptions produced by our lexicon-free approach and transcriptions produced by a standard speech recognition system.Finally, we evaluate the impact of large context neural network character language models as compared to standard n-gram models within our framework. Andrew L. Maas, Ziang Xie, Daniel Jurafsky, Andrew Y. Ng |
HLT-NAACL | 1 |
| 2014 | Sentiment expression conditioned by affective transitions and social forcesabstractHuman emotional states are not independent but rather proceed along systematic paths governed by both internal, cognitive factors and external, social ones. For example, anxiety often transitions to disappointment, which is likely to sink to depression before rising to happiness and relaxation, and these states are conditioned by the states of others in our communities. Modeling these complex dependencies can yield insights into human emotion and support more powerful sentiment technologies. Moritz Sudhof, Andrés Goméz Emilsson, Andrew L. Maas, Christopher Potts |
KDD | 3 |
| 2012 | Recurrent Neural Networks for Noise Reduction in Robust ASRabstractRecent work on deep neural networks as acoustic models for automatic speech recognition (ASR) have demonstrated substantial performance improvements. We introduce a model which uses a deep recurrent auto encoder neural network to denoise input features for robust ASR. The model is trained on stereo (noisy and clean) audio features to predict clean features given noisy input. The model makes no assumptions about how noise affects the signal, nor the existence of distinct noise environments. Instead, the model can learn to model any type of distortion or additive noise given sufficient training data. We demonstrate the model is competitive with existing feature denoising approaches on the Aurora2 task, and outperforms a tandem approach where deep networks are used to predict phoneme posteriors directly. Index Terms: neural networks, robust ASR, deep learning 1. Andrew L. Maas, Quoc V. Le, Tyler M. O'Neil, Oriol Vinyals, Patrick Nguyen, Andrew Y. Ng |
INTERSPEECH | 1 |
| 2011 | Learning Word Vectors for Sentiment Analysis
Andrew L. Maas, Raymond E. Daly, Peter T. Pham, Andrew Y. Ng, Christopher Potts |
ACL | 1 |
| 2008 | Maximum Entropy Inverse Reinforcement Learning
Brian D. Ziebart, Andrew L. Maas, J. Andrew Bagnell, Anind K. Dey |
AAAI | 2 |
| 2008 | Navigate like a cabbie: probabilistic reasoning from observed context-aware behaviorabstractWe present PROCAB, an efficient method for Probabilistically Reasoning from Observed Context-Aware Behavior. It models the context-dependent utilities and underlying reasons that people take different actions. The model generalizes to unseen situations and scales to incorporate rich contextual information. We train our model using the route preferences of 25 taxi drivers demonstrated in over 100,000 miles of collected data, and demonstrate the performance of our model by inferring: (1) decision at next intersection, (2) route to known destination, and (3) destination given partially traveled route. Brian D. Ziebart, Andrew L. Maas, Anind K. Dey, J. Andrew Bagnell |
UbiComp | 2 |