Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Chao Feng 0006
dblp:97/164-6
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 6 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021Theory of computation · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
6 papers |
Mathematical optimization · 89% Approximation and online algorithms · 6% Distributed computing theory · 4% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Data mining · 100% |
Topics — the 16 heaviest of 16, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Mathematical optimization › sparse learning
feature selection |
1.5 | 4 | 2020 | An Efficient Evolutionary Algorithm for Subset Selection with General Cost Constraints · AAAI 2020 Subset Selection by Pareto Optimization with Recombination · AAAI 2020 Distributed Pareto Optimization for Subset Selection · IJCAI 2018 |
Mathematical optimization › multi-objective optimization
pareto optimization |
1.5 | 4 | 2020 | Subset Selection by Pareto Optimization with Recombination · AAAI 2020 Unsupervised Feature Selection by Pareto Optimization · AAAI 2019 Distributed Pareto Optimization for Subset Selection · IJCAI 2018 |
Mathematical optimization
multi-objective optimization |
0.9 | 2 | 2021 | Multi-Objective Submodular Maximization by Regret Ratio Minimization with Theoretical Guarantee · AAAI 2021 Unsupervised Feature Selection by Pareto Optimization · AAAI 2019 |
Mathematical optimization
combinatorial optimization |
0.9 | 2 | 2020 | An Efficient Evolutionary Algorithm for Subset Selection with General Cost Constraints · AAAI 2020 Subset Selection by Pareto Optimization with Recombination · AAAI 2020 |
Mathematical optimization
discrete optimization |
0.7 | 2 | 2018 | Distributed Pareto Optimization for Subset Selection · IJCAI 2018 Sequence Selection by Pareto Optimization · IJCAI 2018 |
Mathematical optimization › submodular optimization › submodular maximization
multi-objective submodular maximization |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Multi-Objective Submodular Maximization by Regret Ratio Minimization with Theoretical Guarantee · AAAI 2021 |
Mathematical optimization › submodular optimization
submodular maximization |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Multi-Objective Submodular Maximization by Regret Ratio Minimization with Theoretical Guarantee · AAAI 2021 |
Mathematical optimization › multi-objective optimization
evolutionary algorithm |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | An Efficient Evolutionary Algorithm for Subset Selection with General Cost Constraints · AAAI 2020 |
Mathematical optimization › multi-objective optimization › evolutionary algorithm
evolutionary multi-objective optimization |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Subset Selection by Pareto Optimization with Recombination · AAAI 2020 |
Data mining
dimensionality reduction |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Unsupervised Feature Selection by Pareto Optimization · AAAI 2019 |
Data mining › dimensionality reduction › feature selection
unsupervised feature selection |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Unsupervised Feature Selection by Pareto Optimization · AAAI 2019 |
Approximation and online algorithms › approximation algorithms
approximation guarantees |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Sequence Selection by Pareto Optimization · IJCAI 2018 |
Distributed computing theory › distributed graph algorithms
distributed approximation |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Distributed Pareto Optimization for Subset Selection · IJCAI 2018 |
Approximation and online algorithms
approximation algorithms |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Multi-Objective Submodular Maximization by Regret Ratio Minimization with Theoretical Guarantee · AAAI 2021 |
Mathematical optimization › statistical estimation › regression
sparse regression |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Subset Selection by Pareto Optimization with Recombination · AAAI 2020 |
Algorithms and data structures
randomized algorithms |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | Unsupervised Feature Selection by Pareto Optimization · AAAI 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
pareto optimization · 1.4column subset selection · 0.8weighted sum scalarization · 0.5sampling · 0.5surrogate objective optimization · 0.4recombination · 0.4mutation · 0.4generalized greedy algorithm · 0.4evolutionary algorithm · 0.4approximation analysis · 0.4randomized iterative algorithm · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Multi-objective evolutionary algorithms are generally good: Maximizing monotone submodular functions over sequences
Chao Qian 0001, Dan-Xuan Liu, Chao Feng 0006, Ke Tang 0001 |
Theor. Comput. Sci. | 3 |
| 2021 | Multi-Objective Submodular Maximization by Regret Ratio Minimization with Theoretical GuaranteeabstractSubmodular maximization has attracted much attention due to its wide application and attractive property. Previous works mainly considered one single objective function, while there can be multiple ones in practice. As the objectives are usually conflicting, there exists a set of Pareto optimal solutions, attaining different optimal trade-offs among multiple objectives. In this paper, we consider the problem of minimizing the regret ratio in multi-objective submodular maximization, which is to find at most k solutions to approximate the whole Pareto set as well as possible. We propose a new algorithm RRMS by sampling representative weight vectors and solving the corresponding weighted sums of objective functions using some given \alpha-approximation algorithm for single-objective submodular maximization. We prove that the regret ratio of the output of RRMS is upper bounded by 1-\alpha+O(\sqrt{d-1}\cdot(\frac{d}{k-d})^{\frac{1}{d-1}}), where d is the number of objectives. This is the first theoretical guarantee for the situation with more than two objectives. When d=2, it reaches the (1-\alpha+O(1/k))-guarantee of the only existing algorithm Polytope. Empirical results on the applications of multi-objective weighted maximum coverage and Max-Cut show the superior performance of RRMS over Polytope. Chao Feng 0006, Chao Qian 0001 |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2020 | Subset Selection by Pareto Optimization with RecombinationabstractSubset selection, i.e., to select a limited number of items optimizing some given objective function, is a fundamental problem with various applications such as unsupervised feature selection and sparse regression. By employing a multi-objective evolutionary algorithm (EA) with mutation only to optimize the given objective function and minimize the number of selected items simultaneously, the recently proposed POSS algorithm achieves state-of-the-art performance for subset selection. In this paper, we propose the PORSS algorithm by incorporating recombination, a characterizing feature of EAs, into POSS. We prove that PORSS can achieve the optimal polynomial-time approximation guarantee as POSS when the objective function is monotone, and can find an optimal solution efficiently in some cases whereas POSS cannot. Extensive experiments on unsupervised feature selection and sparse regression show the superiority of PORSS over POSS. Our analysis also theoretically discloses that recombination from diverse solutions can be more likely than mutation alone to generate various variations, thereby leading to better exploration; this may be of independent interest for understanding the influence of recombination. Chao Qian 0001, Chao Bian 0002, Chao Feng 0006 |
AAAI | 3 |
| 2020 | An Efficient Evolutionary Algorithm for Subset Selection with General Cost ConstraintsabstractIn this paper, we study the problem of selecting a subset from a ground set to maximize a monotone objective function f such that a monotone cost function c is bounded by an upper limit. State-of-the-art algorithms include the generalized greedy algorithm and POMC. The former is an efficient fixed time algorithm, but the performance is limited by the greedy nature. The latter is an anytime algorithm that can find better subsets using more time, but without any polynomial-time approximation guarantee. In this paper, we propose a new anytime algorithm EAMC, which employs a simple evolutionary algorithm to optimize a surrogate objective integrating f and c. We prove that EAMC achieves the best known approximation guarantee in polynomial expected running time. Experimental results on the applications of maximum coverage, influence maximization and sensor placement show the excellent performance of EAMC. Chao Bian 0002, Chao Feng 0006, Chao Qian 0001, Yang Yu 0001 |
AAAI | 2 |
| 2019 | Unsupervised Feature Selection by Pareto OptimizationabstractDimensionality reduction is often employed to deal with the data with a huge number of features, which can be generally divided into two categories: feature transformation and feature selection. Due to the interpretability, the efficiency during inference and the abundance of unlabeled data, unsupervised feature selection has attracted much attention. In this paper, we consider its natural formulation, column subset selection (CSS), which is to minimize the reconstruction error of a data matrix by selecting a subset of features. We propose an anytime randomized iterative approach POCSS, which minimizes the reconstruction error and the number of selected features simultaneously. Its approximation guarantee is well bounded. Empirical results exhibit the superior performance of POCSS over the state-of-the-art algorithms. Chao Feng 0006, Chao Qian 0001, Ke Tang 0001 |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2018 | Sequence Selection by Pareto OptimizationabstractThe problem of selecting a sequence of items from a universe that maximizes some given objective function arises in many real-world applications. In this paper, we propose an anytime randomized iterative approach POSeqSel, which maximizes the given objective function and minimizes the sequence length simultaneously. We prove that for any previously studied objective function, POSeqSel using a reasonable time can always reach or improve the best known approximation guarantee. Empirical results exhibit the superior performance of POSeqSel. Chao Qian 0001, Chao Feng 0006, Ke Tang 0001 |
IJCAI | 2 |
| 2018 | Distributed Pareto Optimization for Subset SelectionabstractThe subset selection problem that selects a few items from a ground set arises in many applications such as maximum coverage, influence maximization, sparse regression, etc. The recently proposed POSS algorithm is a powerful approximation solver for this problem. However, POSS requires centralized access to the full ground set, and thus is impractical for large-scale real-world applications, where the ground set is too large to be stored on one single machine. In this paper, we propose a distributed version of POSS (DPOSS) with a bounded approximation guarantee. DPOSS can be easily implemented in the MapReduce framework. Our extensive experiments using Spark, on various real-world data sets with size ranging from thousands to millions, show that DPOSS can achieve competitive performance compared with the centralized POSS, and is almost always better than the state-of-the-art distributed greedy algorithm RandGreeDi. Chao Qian 0001, Guiying Li 0002, Chao Feng 0006, Ke Tang 0001 |
IJCAI | 3 |