Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Richard Dearden

dblp:97/1979 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
21ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
0009-0000-0807-6606ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 20 · 4 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 7Systems, architecture and hardware · 2Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
14 papers
Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 55% Reinforcement learning · 16% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 12%

Topics — the 28 heaviest of 32, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › planning
plan explanation
0.312017
Robot task planning and explanation in open and uncertain worlds · Artif. Intell. 2017
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
task planning
0.312017
Robot task planning and explanation in open and uncertain worlds · Artif. Intell. 2017
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › planning under uncertainty
partially observable markov decision process
0.322013
Run-Time Improvement of Point-Based POMDP Policies · IJCAI 2013
Planning to see: A hierarchical approach to planning visual actions on a robot using POMDPs · Artif. Intell. 2010
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
markov decision process
0.212013
Run-Time Improvement of Point-Based POMDP Policies · IJCAI 2013
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
policy optimization
0.212013
Run-Time Improvement of Point-Based POMDP Policies · IJCAI 2013
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › planning › online planning
continual planning
0.112011
Exploiting Probabilistic Knowledge under Uncertain Sensing for Efficient Robot Behaviour · IJCAI 2011
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › planning under uncertainty
probabilistic planning
0.112011
Exploiting Probabilistic Knowledge under Uncertain Sensing for Efficient Robot Behaviour · IJCAI 2011
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › graphical models › relational model
probabilistic relational model
0.112011
Exploiting Probabilistic Knowledge under Uncertain Sensing for Efficient Robot Behaviour · IJCAI 2011
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods › sequential monte carlo
particle filtering
0.122005
Continuous Time Particle Filtering · IJCAI 2005
Diagnosis by a waiter and a Mars explorer · Proc. IEEE 2004
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference › bayesian filtering
kalman filtering
0.012004
Diagnosis by a waiter and a Mars explorer · Proc. IEEE 2004
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
state estimation
0.012004
Diagnosis by a waiter and a Mars explorer · Proc. IEEE 2004
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
mobile robot control
0.012011
A Switching Planner for Combined Task and Observation Planning · AAAI 2011
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
object search
0.012011
Exploiting Probabilistic Knowledge under Uncertain Sensing for Efficient Robot Behaviour · IJCAI 2011
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › model-based reinforcement learning › model-based planning
prioritized sweeping
0.012001
Structured Prioritised Sweeping · ICML 2001
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
search-based planning
0.012001
Structured Prioritised Sweeping · ICML 2001
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
planning under uncertainty
0.021997
Abstraction and Approximate Decision-Theoretic Planning · Artif. Intell. 1997
Using Abstractions for Decision-Theoretic Planning with Time Constraints · AAAI 1994
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
factored representation
0.012000
Stochastic dynamic programming with factored representations · Artif. Intell. 2000
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › stochastic optimal control
stochastic dynamic programming
0.012000
Stochastic dynamic programming with factored representations · Artif. Intell. 2000
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › planning
approximate planning
0.011997
Abstraction and Approximate Decision-Theoretic Planning · Artif. Intell. 1997
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference
continuous-time inference
0.012005
Continuous Time Particle Filtering · IJCAI 2005
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
dynamic programming
0.011996
Approximate Value Trees in Structured Dynamic Programming · ICML 1996
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
mobile service robot
0.012004
Diagnosis by a waiter and a Mars explorer · Proc. IEEE 2004
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots › field robotics
planetary rover
0.012004
Diagnosis by a waiter and a Mars explorer · Proc. IEEE 2004
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
policy synthesis
0.011995
Exploiting Structure in Policy Construction · IJCAI 1995
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
structure exploitation
0.011995
Exploiting Structure in Policy Construction · IJCAI 1995
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › temporal planning
time-constrained planning
0.011994
Using Abstractions for Decision-Theoretic Planning with Time Constraints · AAAI 1994
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › planning
abstraction in planning
0.011997
Abstraction and Approximate Decision-Theoretic Planning · Artif. Intell. 1997
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
abstraction and reasoning
0.011994
Using Abstractions for Decision-Theoretic Planning with Time Constraints · AAAI 1994

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

decision-theoretic planning · 0.2point-based value iteration · 0.2satisficing planning · 0.1continual planning · 0.1classical planning · 0.1hierarchical planning · 0.1particle filter · 0.0kalman filter · 0.0structured state abstraction · 0.0dynamic programming · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2017 Robot task planning and explanation in open and uncertain worlds
Marc Hanheide, Moritz Göbelbecker, Graham S. Horn, Andrzej Pronobis, Kristoffer Sjöö, Alper Aydemir, Patric Jensfelt, Charles Gretton, Richard Dearden, Miroslav Janícek, Hendrik Zender, Geert-Jan M. Kruijff, Nick Hawes, Jeremy L. Wyatt
Artif. Intell.9
2013 Run-Time Improvement of Point-Based POMDP Policies
Minlue Wang, Richard Dearden
IJCAI2
2013 Improving robot plans for information gathering tasks through execution monitoring
abstract
Recent advances in navigation and control of robots has increasingly led to systems where the actions are deterministic and the challenge is to collect information about the world using noisy sensors. Examples include search and rescue, Mars rover planning and robotic monitoring tasks. However, theoretical results show that in general these problems are as hard as solving partially observable Markov decision problems (POMDPs). We propose an approach where we build plans assuming both the actions and the observations are reliable, then monitor the execution of the plan and use a value of information calculation to add information gathering actions on-line. We describe two variants: one using a classical contingency planner to generate the initial plan, and the other using a Markov decision problem planner. We show how in both cases the addition of execution monitoring can considerably improve overall performance with lower computational cost than solving the original POMDP.
Minlue Wang, Sebastien Canu, Richard Dearden
IROS3
2012 Learning operators for manipulation planning
abstract
We describe a method for learning planning operators for manipulation tasks from hand-written programs to provide a high-level command interface to a robot manipulator that allows tasks to be specified simply as goals. This is made challenging by the fact that a manipulator is a hybrid system-any model of it consists of discrete variables such as “holding cup” and continuous variables such as the poses of objects and position of the robot. The approach relies on three novel techniques: the action learning from annotated code uses simulation to find PDDL action models corresponding to code fragments. To provide the geometric information needed we use supervised learning to produce a mapping from geometric to symbolic state. The mapping can also be used in reverse to produce a geometric state that makes a set of predicates true, thus allowing desired object positions to be generated during planning. Finally, during execution of the plan we use a partially observable Markov decision problem-based planner to repair the initial plan when unforeseen geometric constraints prevent actions from being executed.
Christopher Burbridge, Zeyn A. Saigol, Florian Schmidt 0001, Christoph Borst 0001, Richard Dearden
IROS5
2011 A Switching Planner for Combined Task and Observation Planning
abstract
From an automated planning perspective the problem of practical mobile robot control in realistic environments poses many important and contrary challenges. On the one hand, the planning process must be lightweight, robust, and timely. Over the lifetime of the robot it must always respond quickly with new plans that accommodate exogenous events, changing objectives, and the underlying unpredictability of the environment. On the other hand, in order to promote efficient behaviours the planning process must perform computationally expensive reasoning about contingencies and possible revisions of subjective beliefs according to quantitatively modelled uncertainty in acting and sensing. Towards addressing these challenges, we develop a continual planning approach that switches between using a fast satisficing "classical" planner, to decide on the overall strategy, and decision-theoretic planning to solve small abstract subproblems where deeper consideration of the sensing model is both practical, and can significantly impact overall performance. We evaluate our approach in large problems from a realistic robot exploration domain.
Moritz Göbelbecker, Charles Gretton, Richard Dearden
AAAI3
2011 Exploiting Probabilistic Knowledge under Uncertain Sensing for Efficient Robot Behaviour
abstract
Robots must perform tasks efficiently and reliably while acting under uncertainty. One way to achieve efficiency is to give the robot commonsense knowledge about the structure of the world. Reliable robot behaviour can be achieved by modelling the uncertainty in the world probabilistically. We present a robot system that combines these two approaches and demonstrate the improvements in efficiency and reliability that result. Our first contribution is a probabilistic relational model integrating common-sense knowledge about the world in general, with observations of a particular environment. Our second contribution is a continual planning system which is able to plan in the large problems posed by that model, by automatically switching between decision-theoretic and classical procedures. We evaluate our system on object search tasks in two different real-world indoor environments. By reasoning about the trade-offs between possible courses of action with different informational effects, and exploiting the cues and general structures of those environments, our robot is able to consistently demonstrate efficient and reliable goal-directed behaviour. 1
Marc Hanheide, Charles Gretton, Richard Dearden, Nick Hawes, Jeremy L. Wyatt, Andrzej Pronobis, Alper Aydemir, Moritz Göbelbecker, Hendrik Zender
IJCAI3
2010 Planning to see: A hierarchical approach to planning visual actions on a robot using POMDPs
Mohan Sridharan, Jeremy L. Wyatt, Richard Dearden
Artif. Intell.3
2009 Information-Lookahead Planning for AUV Mapping
Zeyn A. Saigol, Richard Dearden, Jeremy L. Wyatt, Bramley J. Murton
IJCAI2
2005 Continuous Time Particle Filtering
Brenda Ng, Avi Pfeffer, Richard Dearden
IJCAI3
2004 Dynamic Programming for Structured Continuous Markov Decision Problems
Zhengzhu Feng, Richard Dearden, Nicolas Meuleau, Richard Washington
UAI2
2004 Diagnosis by a waiter and a Mars explorer
abstract
This paper shows how state-of-the-art state estimation techniques can be used to provide efficient solutions to the difficult problem of real-time diagnosis in mobile robots. The power of the adopted estimation techniques resides in our ability to combine particle filters with classical algorithms, such as Kalman filters. We demonstrate these techniques in two scenarios: a mobile waiter robot and planetary rovers designed by NASA for Mars exploration.
Nando de Freitas, Richard Dearden, Frank Hutter, Rubén Morales-Menéndez, Jim Mutch, David Poole 0001
Proc. IEEE2
2003 Scheduling in the Face of Uncertain Resource Consumption and Utility
Jeremy Frank, Richard Dearden
CP2
2002 Planning under Continuous Time and Resource Uncertainty: A Challenge for AI
John L. Bresina, Richard Dearden, Nicolas Meuleau, Sailesh Ramakrishnan, David E. Smith 0001, Richard Washington
UAI2
2001 Structured Prioritised Sweeping
Richard Dearden
ICML1
2000 Stochastic dynamic programming with factored representations
Craig Boutilier, Richard Dearden, Moisés Goldszmidt
Artif. Intell.2
1999 Model based Bayesian Exploration
Richard Dearden, Nir Friedman, David Andre
UAI1
1997 Abstraction and Approximate Decision-Theoretic Planning
Richard Dearden, Craig Boutilier
Artif. Intell.1
1996 Approximate Value Trees in Structured Dynamic Programming
Craig Boutilier, Richard Dearden
ICML2
1995 Exploiting Structure in Policy Construction
Craig Boutilier, Richard Dearden, Moisés Goldszmidt
IJCAI2
1994 Using Abstractions for Decision-Theoretic Planning with Time Constraints
Craig Boutilier, Richard Dearden
AAAI2
1994 Integrating Planning and Execution in Stochastic Domains
Richard Dearden, Craig Boutilier
UAI1