Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Will Drewry

dblp:97/3451 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1Security and privacy · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
1 paper
Systems and software security · 100%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Operating systems · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Systems and software security › operating system security
sandboxing
0.212014
MiniBox: A Two-Way Sandbox for x86 Native Code · USENIX ATC 2014
Operating systems › system security › operating system security › protection mechanism
isolation
0.112014
MiniBox: A Two-Way Sandbox for x86 Native Code · USENIX ATC 2014

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

two-way sandboxing · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 A Risk Assessment Framework for Digital Identification Systems
abstract
We introduce a risk assessment framework for digital identification systems, as well as recommended best practices to enhance privacy, security, and other desirable properties in these systems. To generate these resources, we created a casebook of a wide range of digital identification systems, and we then applied expert analysis and critique to identify patterns. We piloted the framework on several reviews within our organization over a period of approximately one year, and found it to be robust and helpful for those reviews. This work is intended to inform product review and development, product policy, and standards efforts, and to help guide a consistent responsible approach to digital identification across the broader digital identification ecosystem.
Allison Woodruff, Dirk Balfanz, Will Drewry, Mariana Raykova 0001
Proc. Priv. Enhancing Technol.3
2014 MiniBox: A Two-Way Sandbox for x86 Native Code
Jonathan M. McCune, James Newsome, Adrian Perrig, Brandon Baker, Will Drewry
USENIX ATC6