Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Martin Buchheit

dblp:97/5315 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
7ranked-venue papers
6as first author
0since 2021 · last 1998
0000-0002-5528-2039ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 4 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 2 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 74% Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 26%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Data models and query languages · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Logic in computer science · 50% Automated reasoning and model checking · 50%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
ontology
0.021998
Refining the Structure of Terminological Systems: Terminology = Schema + Views · AAAI 1994
A Refined Architecture for Terminological Systems: Terminology = Schema + Views · Artif. Intell. 1998
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › global constraints
cardinality constraints
0.011996
Cardinality Restrictions on Concepts · Artif. Intell. 1996
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
description logic
0.011996
Cardinality Restrictions on Concepts · Artif. Intell. 1996
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › description logic
terminological representation systems
0.011994
Refining the Structure of Terminological Systems: Terminology = Schema + Views · AAAI 1994
Logic in computer science › knowledge representation and reasoning
description logic
0.011993
Decidable Reasoning in Terminological Knowledge Representation Systems · IJCAI 1993

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

tableau reasoning · 0.0description logic · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1998 A Refined Architecture for Terminological Systems: Terminology = Schema + Views
Martin Buchheit, Francesco M. Donini, Werner Nutt, Andrea Schaerf
Artif. Intell.1
1996 Cardinality Restrictions on Concepts
Franz Baader, Martin Buchheit, Bernhard Hollunder
Artif. Intell.2
1994 Refining the Structure of Terminological Systems: Terminology = Schema + Views
Martin Buchheit, Werner Nutt, Francesco M. Donini, Andrea Schaerf
AAAI1
1994 Subsumption between Queries to Object-Oriented Databases
Martin Buchheit, Manfred A. Jeusfeld, Werner Nutt, Martin Staudt 0001
EDBT1
1994 Subsumption between queries to object-oriented databases
Martin Buchheit, Manfred A. Jeusfeld, Werner Nutt, Martin Staudt 0001
Inf. Syst.1
1993 Decidable Reasoning in Terminological Knowledge Representation Systems
Martin Buchheit, Francesco M. Donini, Andrea Schaerf
IJCAI1
1993 Decidable Reasoning in Terminological Knowledge Representation Systems
abstract
Terminological knowledge representation systems (TKRSs) are tools for designing and using knowledge bases that make use of terminological languages (or concept languages). We analyze from a theoretical point of view a TKRS whose capabilities go beyond the ones of presently available TKRSs. The new features studied, often required in practical applications, can be summarized in three main points. First, we consider a highly expressive terminological language, called ALCNR, including general complements of concepts, number restrictions and role conjunction. Second, we allow to express inclusion statements between general concepts, and terminological cycles as a particular case. Third, we prove the decidability of a number of desirable TKRS-deduction services (like satisfiability, subsumption and instance checking) through a sound, complete and terminating calculus for reasoning in ALCNR-knowledge bases. Our calculus extends the general technique of constraint systems. As a byproduct of the proof, we get also the result that inclusion statements in ALCNR can be simulated by terminological cycles, if descriptive semantics is adopted.
Martin Buchheit, Francesco M. Donini, Andrea Schaerf
J. Artif. Intell. Res.1