Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Shih-Lian T. Ou

dblp:97/6282 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2000
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Electronic design automation · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Electronic design automation › physical design › placement
partitioning-based placement
0.012000
Timing-driven placement based on partitioning with dynamic cut-net control · DAC 2000
Electronic design automation
physical design
0.012000
Timing-driven placement based on partitioning with dynamic cut-net control · DAC 2000
Electronic design automation › physical design
placement
0.012000
Timing-driven placement based on partitioning with dynamic cut-net control · DAC 2000
Electronic design automation › physical design › placement
timing-driven placement
0.012000
Timing-driven placement based on partitioning with dynamic cut-net control · DAC 2000

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

quadratic programming · 0.0cut-net control · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2000 Timing-driven placement based on partitioning with dynamic cut-net control
abstract
This paper presents a partitioning-based, timing-driven placement algorithm. The partitioning step itself is timing-driven and based on solving a quadratic programming problem iteratively. The placement algorithm does not rely on interleaved timing calculations, which tend to be inaccurate. Instead, it achieves the desired result by controlling the number of times that a path in the circuit can be cut. In addition to the cutting constraint, a pre-locking mechanism and timing-aware terminal propagation are developed and integrated into the flow. The detailed placement step is formulated as a constrained quadratic program and solved efficiently. Results show improvements of 23.41% on average compared to another timingdriven placement system Timing-QUAD and significant improvements over Eisenmanns placement algorithm.
Shih-Lian T. Ou, Massoud Pedram
DAC1