Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Martin Andreasson

dblp:97/8355 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
0000-0002-6491-494XORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers
Performance modeling and evaluation · 59% Storage systems · 41%
Computer networks
2 papers
Internet architecture and protocols · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Performance modeling and evaluation › delay analysis
completion time analysis
0.212016
On Channel Failures, File Fragmentation Policies, and Heavy-Tailed Completion Times · IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 2016
Storage systems › file systems
file fragmentation
0.212016
On Channel Failures, File Fragmentation Policies, and Heavy-Tailed Completion Times · IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 2016
Internet architecture and protocols
file transfer
0.222016
File Fragmentation over an Unreliable Channel · INFOCOM 2010
On Channel Failures, File Fragmentation Policies, and Heavy-Tailed Completion Times · IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 2016
Performance modeling and evaluation
queueing models
0.112010
File Fragmentation over an Unreliable Channel · INFOCOM 2010

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

stochastic modeling · 0.7tail distribution analysis · 0.5heavy-tailed distribution analysis · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2016 On Channel Failures, File Fragmentation Policies, and Heavy-Tailed Completion Times
abstract
It has been recently discovered that heavy-tailed completion times can result from protocol interaction even when file sizes are light-tailed. A key to this phenomenon is the use of a restart policy where if the file is interrupted before it is completed, it needs to restart from the beginning. In this paper, we show that fragmenting a file into pieces whose sizes are either bounded or independently chosen after each interruption guarantees light-tailed completion time as long as the file size is light-tailed; i.e., in this case, heavy-tailed completion time can only originate from heavy-tailed file sizes. If the file size is heavy-tailed, then the completion time is necessarily heavy-tailed. For this case, we show that when the file size distribution is regularly varying, then under independent or bounded fragmentation, the completion time tail distribution function is asymptotically bounded above by that of the original file size stretched by a constant factor. We then prove that if the distribution of times between interruptions has nondecreasing failure rate, the expected completion time is minimized by dividing the file into equal-sized fragments; this optimal fragment size is unique but depends on the file size. We also present a simple blind fragmentation policy where the fragment sizes are constant and independent of the file size and prove that it is asymptotically optimal. Both these policies are also shown to have desirable completion time tail behavior. Finally, we bound the error in expected completion time due to error in modeling of the failure process.
Jayakrishnan Nair 0001, Martin Andreasson, Lachlan L. H. Andrew, Steven H. Low, John Doyle 0001
IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw.2
2010 File Fragmentation over an Unreliable Channel
abstract
It has been recently discovered that heavy-tailed file completion time can result from protocol interaction even when file sizes are light-tailed. A key to this phenomenon is the RESTART feature where if a file transfer is interrupted before it is completed, the transfer needs to restart from the beginning. In this paper, we show that independent or bounded fragmentation produces light-tailed file completion time as long as the file size is light-tailed, i.e., in this case, heavy-tailed file completion time can only originate from heavy-tailed file sizes. If the file size is heavy-tailed, then the file completion time is clearly heavy-tailed. For this case, we show that when the file size distribution is regularly varying, then under independent or bounded fragmentation, the completion time tail distribution function is asymptotically upper bounded by that of the original file size stretched by a constant factor. We then prove that if the failure distribution has non-decreasing failure rate, the expected completion time is minimized by dividing the file into equal sized fragments; this optimal fragment size is unique but depends on the file size. We also present a simple blind fragmentation policy where the fragment sizes are constant and independent of the file size and prove that it is asymptotically optimal. Finally, we bound the error in expected completion time due to error in modeling of the failure process.
Jayakrishnan Nair 0001, Martin Andreasson, Lachlan L. H. Andrew, Steven H. Low, John Doyle 0001
INFOCOM2