Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Martin Andreasson
dblp:97/8355
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
0000-0002-6491-494XORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Computer networks · 2
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers |
Performance modeling and evaluation · 59% Storage systems · 41% | |
| Computer networks
2 papers |
Internet architecture and protocols · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Performance modeling and evaluation › delay analysis
completion time analysis |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | On Channel Failures, File Fragmentation Policies, and Heavy-Tailed Completion Times · IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 2016 |
Storage systems › file systems
file fragmentation |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | On Channel Failures, File Fragmentation Policies, and Heavy-Tailed Completion Times · IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 2016 |
Internet architecture and protocols
file transfer |
0.2 | 2 | 2016 | File Fragmentation over an Unreliable Channel · INFOCOM 2010 On Channel Failures, File Fragmentation Policies, and Heavy-Tailed Completion Times · IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 2016 |
Performance modeling and evaluation
queueing models |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | File Fragmentation over an Unreliable Channel · INFOCOM 2010 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
stochastic modeling · 0.7tail distribution analysis · 0.5heavy-tailed distribution analysis · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | On Channel Failures, File Fragmentation Policies, and Heavy-Tailed Completion TimesabstractIt has been recently discovered that heavy-tailed completion times can result from protocol interaction even when file sizes are light-tailed. A key to this phenomenon is the use of a restart policy where if the file is interrupted before it is completed, it needs to restart from the beginning. In this paper, we show that fragmenting a file into pieces whose sizes are either bounded or independently chosen after each interruption guarantees light-tailed completion time as long as the file size is light-tailed; i.e., in this case, heavy-tailed completion time can only originate from heavy-tailed file sizes. If the file size is heavy-tailed, then the completion time is necessarily heavy-tailed. For this case, we show that when the file size distribution is regularly varying, then under independent or bounded fragmentation, the completion time tail distribution function is asymptotically bounded above by that of the original file size stretched by a constant factor. We then prove that if the distribution of times between interruptions has nondecreasing failure rate, the expected completion time is minimized by dividing the file into equal-sized fragments; this optimal fragment size is unique but depends on the file size. We also present a simple blind fragmentation policy where the fragment sizes are constant and independent of the file size and prove that it is asymptotically optimal. Both these policies are also shown to have desirable completion time tail behavior. Finally, we bound the error in expected completion time due to error in modeling of the failure process. Jayakrishnan Nair 0001, Martin Andreasson, Lachlan L. H. Andrew, Steven H. Low, John Doyle 0001 |
IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. | 2 |
| 2010 | File Fragmentation over an Unreliable ChannelabstractIt has been recently discovered that heavy-tailed file completion time can result from protocol interaction even when file sizes are light-tailed. A key to this phenomenon is the RESTART feature where if a file transfer is interrupted before it is completed, the transfer needs to restart from the beginning. In this paper, we show that independent or bounded fragmentation produces light-tailed file completion time as long as the file size is light-tailed, i.e., in this case, heavy-tailed file completion time can only originate from heavy-tailed file sizes. If the file size is heavy-tailed, then the file completion time is clearly heavy-tailed. For this case, we show that when the file size distribution is regularly varying, then under independent or bounded fragmentation, the completion time tail distribution function is asymptotically upper bounded by that of the original file size stretched by a constant factor. We then prove that if the failure distribution has non-decreasing failure rate, the expected completion time is minimized by dividing the file into equal sized fragments; this optimal fragment size is unique but depends on the file size. We also present a simple blind fragmentation policy where the fragment sizes are constant and independent of the file size and prove that it is asymptotically optimal. Finally, we bound the error in expected completion time due to error in modeling of the failure process. Jayakrishnan Nair 0001, Martin Andreasson, Lachlan L. H. Andrew, Steven H. Low, John Doyle 0001 |
INFOCOM | 2 |