Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Antonios Matakos

dblp:97/9220 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2013
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Image and video processing · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Image and video processing › regularization
edge-preserving regularization
0.212013
Accelerated Edge-Preserving Image Restoration Without Boundary Artifacts · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2013
Image and video processing › image restoration
image deblurring
0.212013
Accelerated Edge-Preserving Image Restoration Without Boundary Artifacts · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2013
Image and video processing
image restoration
0.212013
Accelerated Edge-Preserving Image Restoration Without Boundary Artifacts · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2013
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization
convex optimization
0.212013
Accelerated Edge-Preserving Image Restoration Without Boundary Artifacts · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2013

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

variable splitting · 0.3fast fourier transform · 0.3augmented lagrangian · 0.3alternating minimization · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2013 Accelerated Edge-Preserving Image Restoration Without Boundary Artifacts
abstract
To reduce blur in noisy images, regularized image restoration methods have been proposed that use nonquadratic regularizers (like l1 regularization or total-variation) that suppress noise while preserving edges in the image. Most of these methods assume a circulant blur (periodic convolution with a blurring kernel) that can lead to wraparound artifacts along the boundaries of the image due to the implied periodicity of the circulant model. Using a noncirculant model could prevent these artifacts at the cost of increased computational complexity. In this paper, we propose to use a circulant blur model combined with a masking operator that prevents wraparound artifacts. The resulting model is noncirculant, so we propose an efficient algorithm using variable splitting and augmented Lagrangian (AL) strategies. Our variable splitting scheme, when combined with the AL framework and alternating minimization, leads to simple linear systems that can be solved noniteratively using fast Fourier transforms (FFTs), eliminating the need for more expensive conjugate gradient-type solvers. The proposed method can also efficiently tackle a variety of convex regularizers, including edge-preserving (e.g., total-variation) and sparsity promoting (e.g., l1-norm) regularizers. Simulation results show fast convergence of the proposed method, along with improved image quality at the boundaries where the circulant model is inaccurate.
Antonios Matakos, Sathish Ramani, Jeffrey A. Fessler
IEEE Trans. Image Process.1
2012 Image restoration using non-circulant shift-invariant system models
abstract
Image restoration is a well studied problem and there are several proposed methods for deblurring and denoising. Recently, there is increasing interest in iterative schemes that employ non-quadratic regularizers, especially edge-preserving like Total Variation (TV) and sparsity promoting like l1regularization. Most methods make simplifying assumptions concerning the system model and the most common one is the use of a circulant blurring model because it facilitates using the FFT. In this work we focus on a more realistic non-circulant blurring model and apply existing algorithms for image restoration with non-quadratic regularization, tailored to work with our non-circulant model.
Antonios Matakos, Sathish Ramani, Jeffrey A. Fessler
ICIP1