Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Nancy Chen
dblp:97/9234
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Machine translation · 70% Language models and text generation · 30% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Machine translation
low-resource machine translation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | DecoMT: Decomposed Prompting for Machine Translation Between Related Languages using Large Language Models · EMNLP 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
prompting |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | DecoMT: Decomposed Prompting for Machine Translation Between Related Languages using Large Language Models · EMNLP 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Machine translation › low-resource machine translation
related-language translation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | DecoMT: Decomposed Prompting for Machine Translation Between Related Languages using Large Language Models · EMNLP 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Machine translation › low-resource machine translation
few-shot machine translation |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | DecoMT: Decomposed Prompting for Machine Translation Between Related Languages using Large Language Models · EMNLP 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
word chunk decomposition · 0.7few-shot prompting · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | DecoMT: Decomposed Prompting for Machine Translation Between Related Languages using Large Language ModelsabstractThis study investigates machine translation between related languages i.e., languages within the same family that share linguistic characteristics such as word order and lexical similarity.Machine translation through few-shot prompting leverages a small set of translation pair examples to generate translations for test sentences.This procedure requires the model to learn how to generate translations while simultaneously ensuring that token ordering is maintained to produce a fluent and accurate translation.We propose that for related languages, the task of machine translation can be simplified by leveraging the monotonic alignment characteristic of such languages.We introduce DecoMT, a novel approach of fewshot prompting that decomposes the translation process into a sequence of word chunk translations.Through automatic and human evaluation conducted on multiple related language pairs across various language families, we demonstrate that our proposed approach of decomposed prompting surpasses multiple established few-shot baseline approaches.For example, DecoMT outperforms the strong fewshot prompting BLOOM model with an average improvement of 8 chrF++ scores across the examined languages. Ratish Puduppully, Anoop Kunchukuttan, Raj Dabre, AiTi Aw, Nancy Chen |
EMNLP | 5 |
| 2023 | FiRo: Finite-context Indexing of Restricted Output Space for NLP Models Facing Noisy InputabstractMinh Nguyen, Nancy Chen. Proceedings of the 13th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing and the 3rd Conference of the Asia-Pacific Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2023. Nancy Chen |
IJCNLP (1) | 2 |
| 2008 | Speech recognition for vocalized and subvocal modes of production using surface EMG signals from the neck and faceabstractWe report automatic speech recognition accuracy for individual words using eleven surface electromyographic (sEMG) recording locations on the face and neck during three speaking modes: vocalized, mouthed, and mentally rehearsed. An HMM based recognition system was trained and tested on a 65 word vocabulary produced by 9 American English speakers in all three speaking modes. Our results indicate high sEMG-based recognition accuracy for the vocalized and mouthed speaking modes (mean rates of 92.1 % and 86.7% respectively), but an inability to conduct recognition on mentally rehearsed speech due to a lack of sufficient sEMG activity. Index Terms: sEMG, subvocal speech, speech recognition Geoffrey S. Meltzner, Jason J. Sroka, James T. Heaton, L. Donald Gilmore, Glen Colby, Serge H. Roy, Nancy Chen, Carlo J. De Luca |
INTERSPEECH | 7 |