Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jan A. Botha

dblp:98/11425 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
11ranked-venue papers
7as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 11 · 7 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
8 papers
Language models and text generation · 40% Information extraction and text analysis · 28% Efficient and distributed learning · 11%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Information retrieval · 50% Knowledge graphs · 50%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Automata and formal languages · 100%

Topics — the 20 heaviest of 21, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › evaluation of language models › multilingual evaluation
multilingual language model evaluation
0.512021
XTREME-R: Towards More Challenging and Nuanced Multilingual Evaluation · EMNLP (1) 2021
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › natural language understanding
multilingual language understanding
0.512021
XTREME-R: Towards More Challenging and Nuanced Multilingual Evaluation · EMNLP (1) 2021
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › entity linking
cross-lingual entity linking
0.412020
Entity Linking in 100 Languages · EMNLP (1) 2020
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
entity linking
0.412020
Entity Linking in 100 Languages · EMNLP (1) 2020
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › knowledge acquisition › ontology learning
ontology induction
0.412020
Asking without Telling: Exploring Latent Ontologies in Contextual Representations · EMNLP (1) 2020
Knowledge graphs › entity linking
cross-lingual entity linking
0.412020
Entity Linking in 100 Languages · EMNLP (1) 2020
Information retrieval › search engines › semantic search
entity retrieval
0.412020
Entity Linking in 100 Languages · EMNLP (1) 2020
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text generation › text rewriting
sentence rewriting
0.312018
Learning To Split and Rephrase From Wikipedia Edit History · EMNLP 2018
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text generation › text simplification › sentence simplification
split and rephrase
0.312018
Learning To Split and Rephrase From Wikipedia Edit History · EMNLP 2018
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text generation
text simplification
0.312018
Learning To Split and Rephrase From Wikipedia Edit History · EMNLP 2018
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression
efficient architecture design
0.312017
Natural Language Processing with Small Feed-Forward Networks · EMNLP 2017
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model compression
0.312017
Natural Language Processing with Small Feed-Forward Networks · EMNLP 2017
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › multilingual NLP
cross-lingual projection
0.212016
Cross-Lingual Morphological Tagging for Low-Resource Languages · ACL (1) 2016
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › morphological analysis
morphological tagging
0.212016
Cross-Lingual Morphological Tagging for Low-Resource Languages · ACL (1) 2016
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › language modeling
morphological language modeling
0.212014
Compositional Morphology for Word Representations and Language Modelling · ICML 2014
Natural language and speech › Machine translation
morphologically rich languages
0.212014
Compositional Morphology for Word Representations and Language Modelling · ICML 2014
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › morphological analysis
morphological segmentation
0.212013
Adaptor Grammars for Learning Non-Concatenative Morphology · EMNLP 2013
Automata and formal languages
grammar formalisms
0.212013
Adaptor Grammars for Learning Non-Concatenative Morphology · EMNLP 2013
Automata and formal languages › grammar formalisms
mildly context-sensitive grammar
0.212013
Adaptor Grammars for Learning Non-Concatenative Morphology · EMNLP 2013
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference
bayesian nonparametric model
0.012013
Adaptor Grammars for Learning Non-Concatenative Morphology · EMNLP 2013

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

negative mining · 0.9dual encoder · 0.9zero-shot evaluation · 0.5few-shot evaluation · 0.5benchmarking · 0.5latent subclass learning · 0.4classifier-based probing · 0.4sequence-to-sequence model · 0.3feedforward neural network · 0.3hidden markov model · 0.2nonparametric bayesian framework · 0.2adaptor grammars · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 FRMT: A Benchmark for Few-Shot Region-Aware Machine Translation
abstract
Abstract We present FRMT, a new dataset and evaluation benchmark for Few-shot Region-aware Machine Translation, a type of style-targeted translation. The dataset consists of professional translations from English into two regional variants each of Portuguese and Mandarin Chinese. Source documents are selected to enable detailed analysis of phenomena of interest, including lexically distinct terms and distractor terms. We explore automatic evaluation metrics for FRMT and validate their correlation with expert human evaluation across both region-matched and mismatched rating scenarios. Finally, we present a number of baseline models for this task, and offer guidelines for how researchers can train, evaluate, and compare their own models. Our dataset and evaluation code are publicly available: https://bit.ly/frmt-task.
Parker Riley, Timothy Dozat, Jan A. Botha, Xavier Garcia, Dan Garrette, Jason Riesa, Orhan Firat, Noah Constant
Trans. Assoc. Comput. Linguistics3
2021 XTREME-R: Towards More Challenging and Nuanced Multilingual Evaluation
abstract
Sebastian Ruder, Noah Constant, Jan Botha, Aditya Siddhant, Orhan Firat, Jinlan Fu, Pengfei Liu, Junjie Hu, Dan Garrette, Graham Neubig, Melvin Johnson. Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2021.
Sebastian Ruder, Noah Constant, Jan A. Botha, Aditya Siddhant, Orhan Firat, Jinlan Fu, Pengfei Liu 0003, Junjie Hu 0001, Dan Garrette, Graham Neubig, Melvin Johnson
EMNLP (1)3
2020 Entity Linking in 100 Languages
abstract
We propose a new formulation for multilingual entity linking, where language-specific mentions resolve to a language-agnostic Knowledge Base. We train a dual encoder in this new setting, building on prior work with improved feature representation, negative mining, and an auxiliary entity-pairing task, to obtain a single entity retrieval model that covers 100+ languages and 20 million entities. The model outperforms state-of-the-art results from a far more limited cross-lingual linking task. Rare entities and low-resource languages pose challenges at this large-scale, so we advocate for an increased focus on zero- and few-shot evaluation. To this end, we provide Mewsli-9, a large new multilingual dataset matched to our setting, and show how frequency-based analysis provided key insights for our model and training enhancements.
Jan A. Botha, Zifei Shan, Daniel Gillick
EMNLP (1)1
2020 Asking without Telling: Exploring Latent Ontologies in Contextual Representations
abstract
The success of pretrained contextual encoders, such as ELMo and BERT, has brought a great deal of interest in what these models learn: do they, without explicit supervision, learn to encode meaningful notions of linguistic structure?If so, how is this structure encoded?To investigate this, we introduce latent subclass learning (LSL): a modification to classifierbased probing that induces a latent categorization (or ontology) of the probe's inputs.Without access to fine-grained gold labels, LSL extracts emergent structure from input representations in an interpretable and quantifiable form.In experiments, we find strong evidence of familiar categories, such as a notion of personhood in ELMo, as well as novel ontological distinctions, such as a preference for fine-grained semantic roles on core arguments.Our results provide unique new evidence of emergent structure in pretrained encoders, including departures from existing annotations which are inaccessible to earlier methods.
Julian Michael, Jan A. Botha, Ian Tenney
EMNLP (1)2
2018 Learning To Split and Rephrase From Wikipedia Edit History
abstract
Split and rephrase is the task of breaking down a sentence into shorter ones that together convey the same meaning.We extract a rich new dataset for this task by mining Wikipedia's edit history: WikiSplit contains one million naturally occurring sentence rewrites, providing sixty times more distinct split examples and a ninety times larger vocabulary than the WebSplit corpus introduced by Narayan et al. (2017) as a benchmark for this task.Incorporating WikiSplit as training data produces a model with qualitatively better predictions that score 32 BLEU points above the prior best result on the WebSplit benchmark.
Jan A. Botha, Manaal Faruqui, John Alex, Jason Baldridge, Dipanjan Das 0001
EMNLP1
2017 Natural Language Processing with Small Feed-Forward Networks
abstract
We show that small and shallow feedforward neural networks can achieve near state-of-the-art results on a range of unstructured and structured language processing tasks while being considerably cheaper in memory and computational requirements than deep recurrent models.Motivated by resource-constrained environments like mobile phones, we showcase simple techniques for obtaining such small neural network models, and investigate different tradeoffs when deciding how to allocate a small memory budget.
Jan A. Botha, Emily Pitler, Ji Ma 0004, Anton Bakalov, Alex Salcianu, David Weiss 0001, Ryan T. McDonald, Slav Petrov
EMNLP1
2016 Cross-Lingual Morphological Tagging for Low-Resource Languages
abstract
Morphologically rich languages often lack the annotated linguistic resources required to develop accurate natural language processing tools.We propose models suitable for training morphological taggers with rich tagsets for low-resource languages without using direct supervision.Our approach extends existing approaches of projecting part-of-speech tags across languages, using bitext to infer constraints on the possible tags for a given word type or token.We propose a tagging model using Wsabie, a discriminative embeddingbased model with rank-based learning.In our evaluation on 11 languages, on average this model performs on par with a baseline weakly-supervised HMM, while being more scalable.Multilingual experiments show that the method performs best when projecting between related language pairs.Despite the inherently lossy projection, we show that the morphological tags predicted by our models improve the downstream performance of a parser by +0.6 LAS on average. 1 This extends, but is not fully consistent with, the set of 12 tags proposed by Petrov et al. (2012).
Jan Buys, Jan A. Botha
ACL (1)2
2014 Compositional Morphology for Word Representations and Language Modelling
abstract
This paper presents a scalable method for integrating compositional morphological representations into a vector-based probabilistic language model. Our approach is evaluated in the context of log-bilinear language models, rendered suitably efficient for implementation inside a machine translation decoder by factoring the vocabulary. We perform both intrinsic and extrinsic evaluations, presenting results on a range of languages which demonstrate that our model learns morphological representations that both perform well on word similarity tasks and lead to substantial reductions in perplexity. When used for translation into morphologically rich languages with large vocabularies, our models obtain improvements of up to 1.2 BLEU points relative to a baseline system using back-off n-gram models.
Jan A. Botha, Phil Blunsom
ICML1
2013 Adaptor Grammars for Learning Non-Concatenative Morphology
abstract
This paper contributes an approach for expressing non-concatenative morphological phenomena, such as stem derivation in Semitic languages, in terms of a mildly context-sensitive grammar formalism.This offers a convenient level of modelling abstraction while remaining computationally tractable.The nonparametric Bayesian framework of adaptor grammars is extended to this richer grammar formalism to propose a probabilistic model that can learn word segmentation and morpheme lexicons, including ones with discontiguous strings as elements, from unannotated data.Our experiments on Hebrew and three variants of Arabic data find that the additional expressiveness to capture roots and templates as atomic units improves the quality of concatenative segmentation and stem identification.We obtain 74% accuracy in identifying triliteral Hebrew roots, while performing morphological segmentation with an F1-score of 78.1.
Jan A. Botha, Phil Blunsom
EMNLP1
2012 Bayesian Language Modelling of German Compounds
Jan A. Botha, Chris Dyer, Phil Blunsom
COLING1
2012 Hierarchical Bayesian Language Modelling for the Linguistically Informed
Jan A. Botha
EACL1