Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Piotr Krychniak

dblp:98/1259 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1996
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 3 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Transaction processing and concurrency control · 100%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Distributed systems · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Transaction processing and concurrency control › transaction models
extended transaction models
0.011994
Specification and Management of Extended Transactions in a Programmable Transaction Environment · ICDE 1994
Distributed systems › distributed object systems
distributed object management
0.011994
Specification and Management of Extended Transactions in a Programmable Transaction Environment · ICDE 1994

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

transaction specification language · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1996 Bounding the Effects of Compensation under Relaxed Multi-level Serializability
Piotr Krychniak, Marek Rusinkiewicz, Andrzej Cichocki, Amit P. Sheth, Gomer Thomas
Distributed Parallel Databases1
1994 Specification and Management of Extended Transactions in a Programmable Transaction Environment
abstract
A Transaction Specification and Management Environment (TSME) is a transaction processing system toolkit that supports the definition and construction of application-specific extended transaction models (ETMs). The TSME provides a transaction specification language that allows a transaction model designer to create implementation-independent specifications of extended transactions. In addition, the TSME provides a programmable transaction management mechanism that assembles and configures a run-time environment to support specified ETMs. The authors discuss the TSME in the context of a distributed object management system (DOMS), and describe specifications of extended transactions and corresponding configurations of transaction management mechanisms.>
Dimitrios Georgakopoulos 0001, Mark F. Hornick, Piotr Krychniak, Frank Manola
ICDE3
1992 Towards a Model for Multidatabase Transactions
abstract
In many application areas the information that may be of interest to a user is stored under the control of multiple, autonomous database systems. To support global transactions in a multidatabase environment, we must coordinate the activities of multiple Database Management Systems that were designed for independent, stand-alone operation. The autonomy and heterogeneity of these systems present a major impediment to the direct adaptation of transaction management mechanisms developed for distributed databases. In this paper we introduce a transaction model designed for a multidatabase environment. A multidatabase transaction is defined by providing a set of (local) sub-transactions, together with their precedence and dataflow requirements. Additionally, the transaction designer may specify failure atomicity and execution atomicity requirements of the multidatabase transaction. These high-level specifications are then used by the scheduler of a multidatabase transaction to assure that its execution satisfies the constraints imposed by the semantics of the application. Uncontrolled interleaving of multidatabase transactions may lead to the violation of interdatabase integrity constraints. We discuss the issues involved in a concurrent execution of multidatabase transactions and propose a new concurrency control correctness criterion that is less restrictive than global serializability. We also show how the multidatabase SQL can be extended to allow the user to specify multidatabase transactions in a nonprocedural way.
Marek Rusinkiewicz, Piotr Krychniak, Andrzej Cichocki
Int. J. Cooperative Inf. Syst.2