Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Eric Nowak

dblp:98/2214 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 2 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Image recognition and object detection · 58% Kernel, tree and ensemble methods · 16% Representation and self-supervised learning · 14%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Information retrieval · 100%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › image classification
content-based image classification
0.112008
Randomized Clustering Forests for Image Classification · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2008
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
ensemble learning
0.112008
Randomized Clustering Forests for Image Classification · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2008
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
image classification
0.112008
Randomized Clustering Forests for Image Classification · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2008
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
image similarity
0.112007
Learning Visual Similarity Measures for Comparing Never Seen Objects · CVPR 2007
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › similarity measure
learned similarity measure
0.112007
Learning Visual Similarity Measures for Comparing Never Seen Objects · CVPR 2007
Information retrieval › similarity search
nearest neighbor search
0.112007
Learning Visual Similarity Measures for Comparing Never Seen Objects · CVPR 2007
Information retrieval
similarity learning
0.112007
Learning Visual Similarity Measures for Comparing Never Seen Objects · CVPR 2007
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
sampling
0.112006
Sampling Strategies for Bag-of-Features Image Classification · ECCV (4) 2006

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

vector quantization · 0.2extremely randomized trees · 0.1SIFT · 0.1saliency map · 0.1random forest · 0.1clustering · 0.1sampling · 0.1bag-of-features · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2016 Are Financial Advisors Money Doctors or Charlatans? Evidence on Trust, Advice, and Risk Taking in Delegated Asset Management
Qizhang Sun, Michael Gibbert, Thomas T. Hills, Eric Nowak
CogSci4
2008 Randomized Clustering Forests for Image Classification
abstract
Some of the most effective recent methods for content-based image classification work by quantizing image descriptors, and accumulating histograms of the resulting visual word codes. Large numbers of descriptors and large codebooks are required for good results and this becomes slow using k-means. We introduce Extremely Randomized Clustering Forests ensembles of randomly created clustering trees and show that they provide more accurate results, much faster training and testing, and good resistance to background clutter. Second, an efficient image classification method is proposed. It combines ERC-Forests and saliency maps very closely with the extraction of image information. For a given image, a classifier builds a saliency map online and uses it to classify the image. We show in several state-of-the-art image classification tasks that this method can speed up the classification process enormously. Finally, we show that the proposed ERC-Forests can also be used very successfully for learning distance between images. The distance computation algorithm consists of learning the characteristic differences between local descriptors sampled from pairs of same or different objects. These differences are vector quantized by ERC-Forests and the similarity measure is computed from this quantization. The similarity measure has been evaluated on four very different datasets and always outperforms the state-of-the-art competitive approaches.
Frank Moosmann, Eric Nowak, Frédéric Jurie
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.2
2007 Learning Visual Similarity Measures for Comparing Never Seen Objects
abstract
In this paper we propose and evaluate an algorithm that learns a similarity measure for comparing never seen objects. The measure is learned from pairs of training images labeled "same" or "different". This is far less informative than the commonly used individual image labels (e.g., "car model X"), but it is cheaper to obtain. The proposed algorithm learns the characteristic differences between local descriptors sampled from pairs of "same" and "different" images. These differences are vector quantized by an ensemble of extremely randomized binary trees, and the similarity measure is computed from the quantized differences. The extremely randomized trees are fast to learn, robust due to the redundant information they carry and they have been proved to be very good clusterers. Furthermore, the trees efficiently combine different feature types (SIFT and geometry). We evaluate our innovative similarity measure on four very different datasets and consistently outperform the state-of-the-art competitive approaches.
Eric Nowak, Frédéric Jurie
CVPR1
2006 Sampling Strategies for Bag-of-Features Image Classification
Eric Nowak, Frédéric Jurie, Bill Triggs
ECCV (4)1