VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Michael R. Paige
dblp:98/3152
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 1978
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 3 · 3 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
2 papers |
Program analysis · 88% Programming languages and type systems · 12% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Electronic design automation · 87% Integrated circuit design · 13% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Program analysis › program representation
program graph |
0.0 | 2 | 1977 | On Partitioning Program Graphs · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1977 Program Graphs, an Algebra, and Their Implication for Programming · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1975 |
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
fault diagnosis |
0.0 | 1 | 1973 | Synthesis of Diagnosable FET Networks · IEEE Trans. Computers 1973 |
Electronic design automation
hardware verification and test |
0.0 | 1 | 1973 | Synthesis of Diagnosable FET Networks · IEEE Trans. Computers 1973 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
test generation · 0.0synthesis procedure · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1978 | An analytical approach to software testingabstractThis paper describes a quantitative software testing methodology for nonstructured and structured programs. The paper first treats some of the recent work by McCabe [3] and Paige [4,5] which has developed the groundwork for a quantitative analysis on software testing. This perspective has set the stage for use of a program-graph basis as the thread for the software testing effort. A basis is a set of paths such that any other path in the graph can be expressed as a com bination of paths in the basis. A technique for generating a unique, practical basis for a program-graph is introduced. The strategy for testing programs using this basis is discussed. The final section treats the simplifying effect of structured programs on this testing approach. Michael R. Paige |
COMPSAC | 1 |
| 1977 | On Partitioning Program GraphsabstractIn recent years, applications of graph theory to computer software have given fruitful results and attracted more and more attention. A program graph is a graph structural model of a program exhibiting the flow relation or connection among the elements (statements) in the program. Michael R. Paige |
IEEE Trans. Software Eng. | 1 |
| 1975 | Program Graphs, an Algebra, and Their Implication for ProgrammingabstractProgram graphs have been used as a vehicle to focus attention on the structure of a program. A systematic methodology for partitioning a program graph (digraph) to highlight the relationships between program elements is introduced along with an attendant notation. This notation is described in purely mathematical terms in the first section, and then the programming-related implications of this approach are addressed in the second section. Michael R. Paige |
IEEE Trans. Software Eng. | 1 |
| 1973 | Synthesis of Diagnosable FET NetworksabstractWith the advent of field-effect transistor (FET) technology it has become practical and economical to employ complex functions as network primitives. This paper describes a synthesis procedure for diagnosable (all single and multiple faults can be detected) FET networks. A companion procedure for generating tests to detect all faults in the resulting network is also described. This methodology does not guarantee the minimality of the network, however, it is intuitively understandable and easy to apply. Michael R. Paige |
IEEE Trans. Computers | 1 |