Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Davide Turcato
dblp:98/4312
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
3as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 3 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Trustworthy machine learning · 33% Information extraction and text analysis · 33% Language models and text generation · 33% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
abusive language detection |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | RTP-LX: Can LLMs Evaluate Toxicity in Multilingual Scenarios? · AAAI 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model evaluation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | RTP-LX: Can LLMs Evaluate Toxicity in Multilingual Scenarios? · AAAI 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
safety evaluation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | RTP-LX: Can LLMs Evaluate Toxicity in Multilingual Scenarios? · AAAI 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
participatory design · 0.9human annotation · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | RTP-LX: Can LLMs Evaluate Toxicity in Multilingual Scenarios?abstractLarge language models (LLMs) and small language models (SLMs) are being adopted at remarkable speed, although their safety still remains a serious concern. With the advent of multilingual S/LLMs, the question now becomes a matter of scale: can we expand multilingual safety evaluations of these models with the same velocity at which they are deployed? To this end, we introduce RTP-LX, a human-transcreated and human-annotated corpus of toxic prompts and outputs in 28 languages. RTP-LX follows participatory design practices, and a portion of the corpus is especially designed to detect culturally-specific toxic language. We evaluate 10 S/LLMs on their ability to detect toxic content in a culturally-sensitive, multilingual scenario. We find that, although they typically score acceptably in terms of accuracy, they have low agreement with human judges when scoring holistically the toxicity of a prompt; and have difficulty discerning harm in context-dependent scenarios, particularly with subtle-yet-harmful content (e.g. microaggressions, bias). We release this dataset to contribute to further reduce harmful uses of these models and improve their safe deployment. Adrian de Wynter, Ishaan Watts, Tua Wongsangaroonsri, Noura Farra, Nektar Ege Altintoprak, Lena Baur, Samantha Claudet, Pavel Gajdusek, Qilong Gu, Anna Kaminska, Tomasz Kaminski, Ruby Kuo, Akiko Kyuba, Kartik Mathur, Petter Merok, Ivana Milovanovic, Nani Paananen, Vesa-Matti Paananen, Anna Pavlenko, Bruno Pereira Vidal, Luciano Strika, Yueh Tsao, Davide Turcato, Oleksandr Vakhno, Judit Velcsov, Anna Vickers, Stéphanie Visser, Herdyan Widarmanto, Andrey Zaikin |
AAAI | 25 |
| 2000 | An Approach to Lexical Development for Inflectional Languages
Davide Turcato, Janine Toole, Stavroula Tsiplakou, Trude Heift, Paul McFetridge |
LREC | 1 |
| 2000 | Machine Translation of Closed Captions
Fred Popowich, Paul McFetridge, Davide Turcato, Janine Toole |
Mach. Transl. | 3 |
| 1999 | A bootstrap approach to automatically generating lexical transfer rulesabstractWe describe a method for automatically generating Lexical Transfer Rules (LTRs) from word equivalences using transfer rule templates. Templates are skeletal LTRs, unspecified for words. New LTRs are created by instantiating a template with words, provided that the words belong to the appropriate lexical categories required by the template. We define two methods for creating an inventory of templates and using them to generate new LTRs. A simpler method consists of extracting a finite set of templates from a sample of hand coded LTRs and directly using them in the generation process. A further method consists of abstracting over the initial finite set of templates to define higher level templates, where bilingual equivalences are defined in terms of correspondences involving phrasal categories. Phrasal templates are then mapped onto sets of lexical templates with the aid of grammars. In this way an infinite set of lexical templates is recursively defined. New LTRs are created by parsing input words, matching a template at the phrasal level and using the corresponding lexical categories to instantiate the lexical template. The definition of an infinite set of templates enables the automatic creation of LTRs for multi-word, non-compositional word equivalences of any cardinality. Davide Turcato, Paul McFetridge, Fred Popowich, Janine Toole |
MTSummit | 1 |
| 1998 | Re-use of lingüistic resources in MIT
Davide Turcato, Fred Popowich, Paul McFetridge, Olivier Laurens |
LREC | 1 |