Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Hao Cui 0003

dblp:98/75-3 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
0009-0006-2456-083XORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 4 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 60% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 23% Reinforcement learning · 17%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 100%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › planning under uncertainty
probabilistic planning
0.522018
From Stochastic Planning to Marginal MAP · NeurIPS 2018
Factored MCTS for Large Scale Stochastic Planning · AAAI 2015
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › planning under uncertainty
POMDP planning
0.412019
Sampling Networks and Aggregate Simulation for Online POMDP Planning · NeurIPS 2019
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference
marginal MAP inference
0.312018
From Stochastic Planning to Marginal MAP · NeurIPS 2018
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
probabilistic inference
0.312018
From Stochastic Planning to Marginal MAP · NeurIPS 2018
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › markov decision process
factored MDP
0.212016
Online Symbolic Gradient-Based Optimization for Factored Action MDPs · IJCAI 2016
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
markov decision process
0.212016
Online Symbolic Gradient-Based Optimization for Factored Action MDPs · IJCAI 2016
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization › convex optimization › first-order methods
gradient-based optimization
0.212016
Online Symbolic Gradient-Based Optimization for Factored Action MDPs · IJCAI 2016
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › planning
large-scale planning
0.212015
Factored MCTS for Large Scale Stochastic Planning · AAAI 2015
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › game tree search
monte carlo tree search
0.212015
Factored MCTS for Large Scale Stochastic Planning · AAAI 2015

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

symbolic gradient-based optimization · 0.5sampling network · 0.4product distributions · 0.4gradient optimization · 0.4aggregate simulation · 0.4symbolic computation · 0.3gradient ascent · 0.3belief propagation · 0.3monte carlo tree search · 0.2aggregation · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 Sampling Networks and Aggregate Simulation for Online POMDP Planning
abstract
The paper introduces a new algorithm for planning in partially observable Markov decision processes (POMDP) based on the idea of aggregate simulation. The algorithm uses product distributions to approximate the belief state and shows how to build a representation graph of an approximate action-value function over belief space. The graph captures the result of simulating the model in aggregate under independence assumptions, giving a symbolic representation of the value function. The algorithm supports large observation spaces using sampling networks, a representation of the process of sampling values of observations, which is integrated into the graph representation. Following previous work in MDPs this approach enables action selection in POMDPs through gradient optimization over the graph representation. This approach complements recent algorithms for POMDPs which are based on particle representations of belief states and an explicit search for action selection. Our approach enables scaling to large factored action spaces in addition to large state spaces and observation spaces. An experimental evaluation demonstrates that the algorithm provides excellent performance relative to state of the art in large POMDP problems.
Hao Cui 0003, Roni Khardon
NeurIPS1
2018 From Stochastic Planning to Marginal MAP
abstract
It is well known that the problems of stochastic planning and probabilistic inference are closely related. This paper makes two contributions in this context. The first is to provide an analysis of the recently developed SOGBOFA heuristic planning algorithm that was shown to be effective for problems with large factored state and action spaces. It is shown that SOGBOFA can be seen as a specialized inference algorithm that computes its solutions through a combination of a symbolic variant of belief propagation and gradient ascent. The second contribution is a new solver for Marginal MAP (MMAP) inference. We introduce a new reduction from MMAP to maximum expected utility problems which are suitable for the symbolic computation in SOGBOFA. This yields a novel algebraic gradient-based solver (AGS) for MMAP. An experimental evaluation illustrates the potential of AGS in solving difficult MMAP problems.
Hao Cui 0003, Radu Marinescu 0002, Roni Khardon
NeurIPS1
2016 Online Symbolic Gradient-Based Optimization for Factored Action MDPs
Hao Cui 0003, Roni Khardon
IJCAI1
2015 Factored MCTS for Large Scale Stochastic Planning
abstract
This paper investigates stochastic planning problemswith large factored state and action spaces. We show that even with moderate increase in the size of existing challenge problems, the performance of state of the art algorithms deteriorates rapidly, making them ineffective.To address this problem we propose a family of simple but scalable online planning algorithms that combine sampling, as in Monte Carlo tree search, with “aggregation,” where the aggregation approximates a distribution over random variables by the product of their marginals. The algorithms are correct under some rather strong technical conditions and can serve as an unsound but effective heuristic when the conditions do not hold. An extensive experimental evaluation demonstrates that the new algorithms provide significant improvement over the state of the art when solving largeproblems in a number of challenge benchmark domains.
Hao Cui 0003, Roni Khardon, Alan Fern, Prasad Tadepalli
AAAI1