Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Henry M. Wood
dblp:99/10673
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
0000-0003-3009-5904ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 4 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
3 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › cancer genomics › copy number analysis
copy number alteration analysis |
0.6 | 3 | 2015 | Stratifying tumour subtypes based on copy number alteration profiles using next-generation sequence data · Bioinform. 2015 Estimating optimal window size for analysis of low-coverage next-generation sequence data · Bioinform. 2014 Correcting for cancer genome size and tumour cell content enables better estimation of copy number alterations from next-generation sequence data · Bioinform. 2012 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
cancer genomics |
0.4 | 2 | 2015 | Stratifying tumour subtypes based on copy number alteration profiles using next-generation sequence data · Bioinform. 2015 Correcting for cancer genome size and tumour cell content enables better estimation of copy number alterations from next-generation sequence data · Bioinform. 2012 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › cancer genomics › cancer subtype analysis
cancer subtype classification |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Stratifying tumour subtypes based on copy number alteration profiles using next-generation sequence data · Bioinform. 2015 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics
next-generation sequencing data analysis |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Estimating optimal window size for analysis of low-coverage next-generation sequence data · Bioinform. 2014 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › cancer genomics › copy number analysis
copy number estimation |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Correcting for cancer genome size and tumour cell content enables better estimation of copy number alterations from next-generation sequence data · Bioinform. 2012 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
cross-validation · 0.4mixed model · 0.2logistic regression · 0.2akaike information criterion · 0.2ploidy estimation · 0.1multi-modality distribution analysis · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Sparse modelling of cancer patients' survival based on genomic copy number alterations
Khaled Alqahtani, Charles C. Taylor, Henry M. Wood, Arief Gusnanto |
J. Biomed. Informatics | 3 |
| 2015 | Stratifying tumour subtypes based on copy number alteration profiles using next-generation sequence dataabstractMOTIVATION: The role of personalized medicine and target treatment in the clinical management of cancer patients has become increasingly important in recent years. This has made the task of precise histological substratification of cancers crucial. Increasingly, genomic data are being seen as a valuable classifier. Specifically, copy number alteration (CNA) profiles generated by next-generation sequencing (NGS) can become a determinant for tumours subtyping. The principle purpose of this study is to devise a model with good prediction capability for the tumours histological subtypes as a function of both the patients covariates and their genome-wide CNA profiles from NGS data. RESULTS: We investigate a logistic regression for modelling tumour histological subtypes as a function of the patients' covariates and their CNA profiles, in a mixed model framework. The covariates, such as age and gender, are considered as fixed predictors and the genome-wide CNA profiles are considered as random predictors. We illustrate the application of this model in lung and oral cancer datasets, and the results indicate that the tumour histological subtypes can be modelled with a good fit. Our cross-validation indicates that the logistic regression exhibits the best prediction relative to other classification methods we considered in this study. The model also exhibits the best agreement in the prediction between smooth-segmented and circular binary-segmented CNA profiles. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: An R package to run a logistic regression is available in http://www1.maths.leeds.ac.uk/~arief/R/CNALR/. CONTACT: [email protected] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Arief Gusnanto, Peter Tcherveniakov, Farag Shuweihdi, Manar Samman, Pamela Rabbitts, Henry M. Wood |
Bioinform. | 6 |
| 2014 | Estimating optimal window size for analysis of low-coverage next-generation sequence dataabstractMOTIVATION: Current high-throughput sequencing has greatly transformed genome sequence analysis. In the context of very low-coverage sequencing (<0.1×), performing 'binning' or 'windowing' on mapped short sequences ('reads') is critical to extract genomic information of interest for further evaluation, such as copy-number alteration analysis. If the window size is too small, many windows will exhibit zero counts and almost no pattern can be observed. In contrast, if the window size is too wide, the patterns or genomic features will be 'smoothed out'. Our objective is to identify an optimal window size in between the two extremes. RESULTS: We assume the reads density to be a step function. Given this model, we propose a data-based estimation of optimal window size based on Akaike's information criterion (AIC) and cross-validation (CV) log-likelihood. By plotting the AIC and CV log-likelihood curve as a function of window size, we are able to estimate the optimal window size that minimizes AIC or maximizes CV log-likelihood. The proposed methods are of general purpose and we illustrate their application using low-coverage next-generation sequence datasets from real tumour samples and simulated datasets. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: An R package to estimate optimal window size is available at http://www1.maths.leeds.ac.uk/∼arief/R/win/. Arief Gusnanto, Charles C. Taylor, Ibrahim Nafisah, Henry M. Wood, Pamela Rabbitts, Stefano Berri |
Bioinform. | 4 |
| 2012 | Correcting for cancer genome size and tumour cell content enables better estimation of copy number alterations from next-generation sequence dataabstractMOTIVATION: Comparison of read depths from next-generation sequencing between cancer and normal cells makes the estimation of copy number alteration (CNA) possible, even at very low coverage. However, estimating CNA from patients' tumour samples poses considerable challenges due to infiltration with normal cells and aneuploid cancer genomes. Here we provide a method that corrects contamination with normal cells and adjusts for genomes of different sizes so that the actual copy number of each region can be estimated. RESULTS: The procedure consists of several steps. First, we identify the multi-modality of the distribution of smoothed ratios. Then we use the estimates of the mean (modes) to identify underlying ploidy and the contamination level, and finally we perform the correction. The results indicate that the method works properly to estimate genomic regions with gains and losses in a range of simulated data as well as in two datasets from lung cancer patients. It also proves a powerful tool when analysing publicly available data from two cell lines (HCC1143 and COLO829). AVAILABILITY: An R package, called CNAnorm, is available at http://www.precancer.leeds.ac.uk/cnanorm or from Bioconductor. CONTACT: [email protected] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Arief Gusnanto, Henry M. Wood, Yudi Pawitan, Pamela Rabbitts, Stefano Berri |
Bioinform. | 2 |