Nicholas A. Steinmetz

dblp:99/3005 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0001-7029-2908ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
3 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 82% Medical and health informatics · 18%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Representation and self-supervised learning · 100%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › single-cell analysis › cell type annotation
cell type classification
0.912025
In vivo cell-type and brain region classification via multimodal contrastive learning · ICLR 2025
Bioinformatics and computational biology › neuroscience
neuroinformatics
0.912025
In vivo cell-type and brain region classification via multimodal contrastive learning · ICLR 2025
Medical and health informatics
brain-computer interface
0.712023
Bypassing spike sorting: Density-based decoding using spike localization from dense multielectrode probes · NeurIPS 2023
Bioinformatics and computational biology › computational neuroscience
neural decoding
0.712023
Bypassing spike sorting: Density-based decoding using spike localization from dense multielectrode probes · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
contrastive learning
0.312025
In vivo cell-type and brain region classification via multimodal contrastive learning · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › contrastive learning
multimodal contrastive learning
0.312025
In vivo cell-type and brain region classification via multimodal contrastive learning · ICLR 2025
Bioinformatics and computational biology › neuroscience › neuroinformatics
neural data analysis
0.212016
Fast and accurate spike sorting of high-channel count probes with KiloSort · NIPS 2016
Bioinformatics and computational biology › neuroscience › neuroinformatics › neural data analysis
spike sorting
0.212016
Fast and accurate spike sorting of high-channel count probes with KiloSort · NIPS 2016
Bioinformatics and computational biology
electrophysiology
0.112016
Fast and accurate spike sorting of high-channel count probes with KiloSort · NIPS 2016

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

supervised fine-tuning · 1.7multimodal contrastive learning · 1.7variational inference · 0.7mixture of gaussians · 0.7template matching · 0.2clustering · 0.2GPU optimization · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 In vivo cell-type and brain region classification via multimodal contrastive learning
abstract
Current electrophysiological approaches can track the activity of many neurons, yet it is usually unknown which cell-types or brain areas are being recorded without further molecular or histological analysis. Developing accurate and scalable algorithms for identifying the cell-type and brain region of recorded neurons is thus crucial for improving our understanding of neural computation. In this work, we develop a multimodal contrastive learning approach for neural data that can be fine-tuned for different downstream tasks, including inference of cell-type and brain location. We utilize multimodal contrastive learning to jointly embed the activity autocorrelations and extracellular waveforms of individual neurons. We demonstrate that our embedding approach, Neuronal Embeddings via MultimOdal Contrastive Learning (NEMO), paired with supervised fine-tuning, achieves state-of-the-art cell-type classification for two opto-tagged datasets and brain region classification for the public International Brain Laboratory Brain-wide Map dataset. Our method represents a promising step towards accurate cell-type and brain region classification from electrophysiological recordings.
Hanrui Lyu, YiXun Xu, Charles Windolf, Eric Kenji Lee, Andrew M. Shelton, Olivier Winter, Eva L. Dyer, Chandramouli Chandrasekaran, Nicholas A. Steinmetz, Liam Paninski, Cole L. Hurwitz
ICLR12
2023 Bypassing spike sorting: Density-based decoding using spike localization from dense multielectrode probes
abstract
Neural decoding and its applications to brain computer interfaces (BCI) are essential for understanding the association between neural activity and behavior. A prerequisite for many decoding approaches is spike sorting, the assignment of action potentials (spikes) to individual neurons. Current spike sorting algorithms, however, can be inaccurate and do not properly model uncertainty of spike assignments, therefore discarding information that could potentially improve decoding performance. Recent advances in high-density probes (e.g., Neuropixels) and computational methods now allow for extracting a rich set of spike features from unsorted data; these features can in turn be used to directly decode behavioral correlates. To this end, we propose a spike sorting-free decoding method that directly models the distribution of extracted spike features using a mixture of Gaussians (MoG) encoding the uncertainty of spike assignments, without aiming to solve the spike clustering problem explicitly. We allow the mixing proportion of the MoG to change over time in response to the behavior and develop variational inference methods to fit the resulting model and to perform decoding. We benchmark our method with an extensive suite of recordings from different animals and probe geometries, demonstrating that our proposed decoder can consistently outperform current methods based on thresholding (i.e. multi-unit activity) and spike sorting. Open source code is available at https://github.com/yzhang511/density_decoding.
Yizi Zhang, Tianxiao He, Julien Boussard, Charles Windolf, Olivier Winter, Eric Trautmann, Noam Roth, Hailey Barrell, Mark Churchland, Nicholas A. Steinmetz, Erdem Varol, Cole L. Hurwitz, Liam Paninski
NeurIPS10
2016 Fast and accurate spike sorting of high-channel count probes with KiloSort
abstract
New silicon technology is enabling large-scale electrophysiological recordings in vivo from hundreds to thousands of channels. Interpreting these recordings requires scalable and accurate automated methods for spike sorting, which should minimize the time required for manual curation of the results. Here we introduce KiloSort, a new integrated spike sorting framework that uses template matching both during spike detection and during spike clustering. KiloSort models the electrical voltage as a sum of template waveforms triggered on the spike times, which allows overlapping spikes to be identified and resolved. Unlike previous algorithms that compress the data with PCA, KiloSort operates on the raw data which allows it to construct a more accurate model of the waveforms. Processing times are faster than in previous algorithms thanks to batch-based optimization on GPUs. We compare KiloSort to an established algorithm and show favorable performance, at much reduced processing times. A novel post-clustering merging step based on the continuity of the templates further reduced substantially the number of manual operations required on this data, for the neurons with near-zero error rates, paving the way for fully automated spike sorting of multichannel electrode recordings.
Marius Pachitariu, Nicholas A. Steinmetz, Shabnam N. Kadir, Matteo Carandini, Kenneth D. Harris
NIPS2