VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Nicholas A. Steinmetz
dblp:99/3005
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0001-7029-2908ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
3 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 82% Medical and health informatics · 18% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Representation and self-supervised learning · 100% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › single-cell analysis › cell type annotation
cell type classification |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | In vivo cell-type and brain region classification via multimodal contrastive learning · ICLR 2025 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › neuroscience
neuroinformatics |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | In vivo cell-type and brain region classification via multimodal contrastive learning · ICLR 2025 |
Medical and health informatics
brain-computer interface |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Bypassing spike sorting: Density-based decoding using spike localization from dense multielectrode probes · NeurIPS 2023 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › computational neuroscience
neural decoding |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Bypassing spike sorting: Density-based decoding using spike localization from dense multielectrode probes · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
contrastive learning |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | In vivo cell-type and brain region classification via multimodal contrastive learning · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › contrastive learning
multimodal contrastive learning |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | In vivo cell-type and brain region classification via multimodal contrastive learning · ICLR 2025 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › neuroscience › neuroinformatics
neural data analysis |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Fast and accurate spike sorting of high-channel count probes with KiloSort · NIPS 2016 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › neuroscience › neuroinformatics › neural data analysis
spike sorting |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Fast and accurate spike sorting of high-channel count probes with KiloSort · NIPS 2016 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
electrophysiology |
0.1 | 1 | 2016 | Fast and accurate spike sorting of high-channel count probes with KiloSort · NIPS 2016 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
supervised fine-tuning · 1.7multimodal contrastive learning · 1.7variational inference · 0.7mixture of gaussians · 0.7template matching · 0.2clustering · 0.2GPU optimization · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | In vivo cell-type and brain region classification via multimodal contrastive learningabstractCurrent electrophysiological approaches can track the activity of many neurons, yet it is usually unknown which cell-types or brain areas are being recorded without further molecular or histological analysis. Developing accurate and scalable algorithms for identifying the cell-type and brain region of recorded neurons is thus crucial for improving our understanding of neural computation. In this work, we develop a multimodal contrastive learning approach for neural data that can be fine-tuned for different downstream tasks, including inference of cell-type and brain location. We utilize multimodal contrastive learning to jointly embed the activity autocorrelations and extracellular waveforms of individual neurons. We demonstrate that our embedding approach, Neuronal Embeddings via MultimOdal Contrastive Learning (NEMO), paired with supervised fine-tuning, achieves state-of-the-art cell-type classification for two opto-tagged datasets and brain region classification for the public International Brain Laboratory Brain-wide Map dataset. Our method represents a promising step towards accurate cell-type and brain region classification from electrophysiological recordings. Hanrui Lyu, YiXun Xu, Charles Windolf, Eric Kenji Lee, Andrew M. Shelton, Olivier Winter, Eva L. Dyer, Chandramouli Chandrasekaran, Nicholas A. Steinmetz, Liam Paninski, Cole L. Hurwitz |
ICLR | 12 |
| 2023 | Bypassing spike sorting: Density-based decoding using spike localization from dense multielectrode probesabstractNeural decoding and its applications to brain computer interfaces (BCI) are essential for understanding the association between neural activity and behavior. A prerequisite for many decoding approaches is spike sorting, the assignment of action potentials (spikes) to individual neurons. Current spike sorting algorithms, however, can be inaccurate and do not properly model uncertainty of spike assignments, therefore discarding information that could potentially improve decoding performance. Recent advances in high-density probes (e.g., Neuropixels) and computational methods now allow for extracting a rich set of spike features from unsorted data; these features can in turn be used to directly decode behavioral correlates. To this end, we propose a spike sorting-free decoding method that directly models the distribution of extracted spike features using a mixture of Gaussians (MoG) encoding the uncertainty of spike assignments, without aiming to solve the spike clustering problem explicitly. We allow the mixing proportion of the MoG to change over time in response to the behavior and develop variational inference methods to fit the resulting model and to perform decoding. We benchmark our method with an extensive suite of recordings from different animals and probe geometries, demonstrating that our proposed decoder can consistently outperform current methods based on thresholding (i.e. multi-unit activity) and spike sorting. Open source code is available at https://github.com/yzhang511/density_decoding. Yizi Zhang, Tianxiao He, Julien Boussard, Charles Windolf, Olivier Winter, Eric Trautmann, Noam Roth, Hailey Barrell, Mark Churchland, Nicholas A. Steinmetz, Erdem Varol, Cole L. Hurwitz, Liam Paninski |
NeurIPS | 10 |
| 2016 | Fast and accurate spike sorting of high-channel count probes with KiloSortabstractNew silicon technology is enabling large-scale electrophysiological recordings in vivo from hundreds to thousands of channels. Interpreting these recordings requires scalable and accurate automated methods for spike sorting, which should minimize the time required for manual curation of the results. Here we introduce KiloSort, a new integrated spike sorting framework that uses template matching both during spike detection and during spike clustering. KiloSort models the electrical voltage as a sum of template waveforms triggered on the spike times, which allows overlapping spikes to be identified and resolved. Unlike previous algorithms that compress the data with PCA, KiloSort operates on the raw data which allows it to construct a more accurate model of the waveforms. Processing times are faster than in previous algorithms thanks to batch-based optimization on GPUs. We compare KiloSort to an established algorithm and show favorable performance, at much reduced processing times. A novel post-clustering merging step based on the continuity of the templates further reduced substantially the number of manual operations required on this data, for the neurons with near-zero error rates, paving the way for fully automated spike sorting of multichannel electrode recordings. Marius Pachitariu, Nicholas A. Steinmetz, Shabnam N. Kadir, Matteo Carandini, Kenneth D. Harris |
NIPS | 2 |