VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Christopher Giblin
dblp:99/3573
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Trustworthy machine learning · 67% Autonomous driving · 33% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
AI governance |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Usage Governance Advisor: From Intent to AI Governance · AAAI 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Usage Governance Advisor: From Intent to AI Governance · AAAI 2025 |
Robotics › Autonomous driving
risk assessment |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Usage Governance Advisor: From Intent to AI Governance · AAAI 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
natural language processing · 0.9human-in-the-loop · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Usage Governance Advisor: From Intent to AI GovernanceabstractBringing a new AI system into a production environment involves multiple different stakeholders such as business owners, risk officer, ethics officers approving the AI System for a specific usage. Governance frameworks typically include multiple manual steps, including curating information needed to assess risks and reviewing outcomes to identify appropriate actions and governance strategies. We demo a human-in-the-loop automation system that takes a natural language description of an intended use case for an AI system in order to create semi-structured governance information, recommend the most appropriate model for that use case, prioritise risks to be evaluated, automatically running those evaluations and finally storing these results for auditing, reporting and future recommendations. As a result we increase transparency to stakeholders and provide valuable information to aid in decision making when assessing risks associated with an AI solution. Elizabeth Daly, Seshu Tirupathi, Sean Rooney, Inge Vejsbjerg, Dhaval Salwala, Christopher Giblin, Frank Bagehorn, Luis Garcés-Erice, Peter Urbanetz, Mira L. Wolf-Bauwens |
AAAI | 6 |
| 2005 | Regulations Expressed As Logical Models (REALM)
Christopher Giblin, Ying Liu 0045, Samuel Müller 0002, Birgit Pfitzmann |
JURIX | 1 |