Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.

Christopher Giblin

dblp:99/3573 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Trustworthy machine learning · 67% Autonomous driving · 33%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
AI governance
0.912025
Usage Governance Advisor: From Intent to AI Governance · AAAI 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
0.912025
Usage Governance Advisor: From Intent to AI Governance · AAAI 2025
Robotics › Autonomous driving
risk assessment
0.912025
Usage Governance Advisor: From Intent to AI Governance · AAAI 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

natural language processing · 0.9human-in-the-loop · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Usage Governance Advisor: From Intent to AI Governance
abstract
Bringing a new AI system into a production environment involves multiple different stakeholders such as business owners, risk officer, ethics officers approving the AI System for a specific usage. Governance frameworks typically include multiple manual steps, including curating information needed to assess risks and reviewing outcomes to identify appropriate actions and governance strategies. We demo a human-in-the-loop automation system that takes a natural language description of an intended use case for an AI system in order to create semi-structured governance information, recommend the most appropriate model for that use case, prioritise risks to be evaluated, automatically running those evaluations and finally storing these results for auditing, reporting and future recommendations. As a result we increase transparency to stakeholders and provide valuable information to aid in decision making when assessing risks associated with an AI solution.
Elizabeth Daly, Seshu Tirupathi, Sean Rooney, Inge Vejsbjerg, Dhaval Salwala, Christopher Giblin, Frank Bagehorn, Luis Garcés-Erice, Peter Urbanetz, Mira L. Wolf-Bauwens
AAAI6
2005 Regulations Expressed As Logical Models (REALM)
Christopher Giblin, Ying Liu 0045, Samuel Müller 0002, Birgit Pfitzmann
JURIX1