Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Shuyu Dan Li

dblp:99/4247 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
0000-0002-1163-8339ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 65% Medical and health informatics · 35%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › network bioinformatics › biological network analysis
disease network analysis
0.212016
Comparative analyses of population-scale phenomic data in electronic medical records reveal race-specific disease networks · Bioinform. 2016
Medical and health informatics
electronic health records
0.212016
Comparative analyses of population-scale phenomic data in electronic medical records reveal race-specific disease networks · Bioinform. 2016
Bioinformatics and computational biology › biological database
genetic variation database
0.212016
DIVAS: a centralized genetic variant repository representing 150 000 individuals from multiple disease cohorts · Bioinform. 2016
Bioinformatics and computational biology
phenomics
0.212016
Comparative analyses of population-scale phenomic data in electronic medical records reveal race-specific disease networks · Bioinform. 2016
Medical and health informatics
clinical genomics
0.112016
DIVAS: a centralized genetic variant repository representing 150 000 individuals from multiple disease cohorts · Bioinform. 2016
Medical and health informatics › clinical data analysis
multimorbidity analysis
0.112016
Comparative analyses of population-scale phenomic data in electronic medical records reveal race-specific disease networks · Bioinform. 2016

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

population frequency analysis · 0.2network analysis · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2016 DIVAS: a centralized genetic variant repository representing 150 000 individuals from multiple disease cohorts
abstract
MOTIVATION: A plethora of sequenced and genotyped disease cohorts is available to the biomedical research community, spread across many portals and represented in various formats. RESULTS: We have gathered several large studies, including GERA and GRU, and computed population- and disease-specific genetic variant frequencies. In total, our portal provides fast access to genetic variants observed in 84,928 individuals from 39 disease populations. We also include 66,335 controls, such as the 1000 Genomes and Scripps Wellderly. CONCLUSION: Combining multiple studies helps validate disease-associated variants in each underlying data set, detect potential false positives using frequencies of control populations, and identify novel candidate disease-causing alterations in known or suspected genes. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: https://rvs.u.hpc.mssm.edu/divas CONTACT: [email protected] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Wei-Yi Cheng, Jörg Hakenberg, Shuyu Dan Li, Rong Chen 0006
Bioinform.3
2016 Comparative analyses of population-scale phenomic data in electronic medical records reveal race-specific disease networks
abstract
MOTIVATION: Underrepresentation of racial groups represents an important challenge and major gap in phenomics research. Most of the current human phenomics research is based primarily on European populations; hence it is an important challenge to expand it to consider other population groups. One approach is to utilize data from EMR databases that contain patient data from diverse demographics and ancestries. The implications of this racial underrepresentation of data can be profound regarding effects on the healthcare delivery and actionability. To the best of our knowledge, our work is the first attempt to perform comparative, population-scale analyses of disease networks across three different populations, namely Caucasian (EA), African American (AA) and Hispanic/Latino (HL). RESULTS: We compared susceptibility profiles and temporal connectivity patterns for 1988 diseases and 37 282 disease pairs represented in a clinical population of 1 025 573 patients. Accordingly, we revealed appreciable differences in disease susceptibility, temporal patterns, network structure and underlying disease connections between EA, AA and HL populations. We found 2158 significantly comorbid diseases for the EA cohort, 3265 for AA and 672 for HL. We further outlined key disease pair associations unique to each population as well as categorical enrichments of these pairs. Finally, we identified 51 key 'hub' diseases that are the focal points in the race-centric networks and of particular clinical importance. Incorporating race-specific disease comorbidity patterns will produce a more accurate and complete picture of the disease landscape overall and could support more precise understanding of disease relationships and patient management towards improved clinical outcomes. CONTACTS: [email protected] or [email protected] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Benjamin S. Glicksberg, Li Li 0062, Marcus A. Badgeley, Khader Shameer, Roman Kosoy, Noam D. Beckmann, Nam Pho, Jörg Hakenberg, Kristin L. Ayers, Gabriel E. Hoffman, Shuyu Dan Li, Eric E. Schadt, Chirag J. Patel, Rong Chen 0006, Joel Dudley
Bioinform.12