Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Guillaume Lecué

dblp:99/500 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
13ranked-venue papers
7as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0002-6391-8746ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 10 · 7 first-author · 2 since 2021Theory of computation · 2Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
6 papers
Mathematical optimization · 60% Information theory · 32% Algorithms and data structures · 5%
Artificial intelligence
6 papers
Learning theory · 54% Kernel, tree and ensemble methods · 24% 3D vision · 11%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data mining · 100%

Topics — the 29 heaviest of 29, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Mathematical optimization
statistical learning theory
1.132024
Learning with a linear loss function: excess risk and estimation bounds for ERM, minmax MOM and their regularized versions with applications to robustness in sparse PCA · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024
Regularization and the small-ball method II: complexity dependent error rates · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2017
Lower Bounds and Aggregation in Density Estimation · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2006
Mathematical optimization › statistical estimation
robust estimation
0.812024
Learning with a linear loss function: excess risk and estimation bounds for ERM, minmax MOM and their regularized versions with applications to robustness in sparse PCA · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024
Machine learning › Learning theory
statistical learning theory
0.622021
Learning with semi-definite programming: statistical bounds based on fixed point analysis and excess risk curvature · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2021
Sharp Oracle Inequalities for High-Dimensional Matrix Prediction · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2011
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization bounds
0.512021
Learning with semi-definite programming: statistical bounds based on fixed point analysis and excess risk curvature · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2021
Mathematical optimization
semidefinite programming
0.512021
Learning with semi-definite programming: statistical bounds based on fixed point analysis and excess risk curvature · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2021
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
kernel methods
0.412019
MONK Outlier-Robust Mean Embedding Estimation by Median-of-Means · ICML 2019
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods › kernel embedding
mean embedding
0.412019
MONK Outlier-Robust Mean Embedding Estimation by Median-of-Means · ICML 2019
Machine learning › Learning theory › statistical estimation › robust statistics
median-of-means
0.412019
MONK Outlier-Robust Mean Embedding Estimation by Median-of-Means · ICML 2019
Computer vision › 3D vision
robust estimation
0.412019
MONK Outlier-Robust Mean Embedding Estimation by Median-of-Means · ICML 2019
Information theory › signal processing › compressed sensing › sparse recovery
basis pursuit
0.312018
On the Gap Between Restricted Isometry Properties and Sparse Recovery Conditions · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2018
Information theory › signal processing
compressed sensing
0.312018
On the Gap Between Restricted Isometry Properties and Sparse Recovery Conditions · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2018
Information theory › signal processing › compressed sensing
restricted isometry property
0.312018
On the Gap Between Restricted Isometry Properties and Sparse Recovery Conditions · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2018
Information theory › signal processing › compressed sensing
sparse recovery
0.312018
On the Gap Between Restricted Isometry Properties and Sparse Recovery Conditions · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2018
Mathematical optimization › regularization
regularized empirical risk minimization
0.312017
Regularization and the small-ball method II: complexity dependent error rates · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2017
Algorithms and data structures › numerical linear algebra › dimensionality reduction › principal component analysis
sparse PCA
0.212024
Learning with a linear loss function: excess risk and estimation bounds for ERM, minmax MOM and their regularized versions with applications to robustness in sparse PCA · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024
Machine learning › Learning theory › excess risk bounds
oracle inequality
0.222011
Sharp Oracle Inequalities for High-Dimensional Matrix Prediction · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2011
Optimal Oracle Inequality for Aggregation of Classifiers Under Low Noise Condition · COLT 2006
Data mining
clustering
0.112021
Learning with semi-definite programming: statistical bounds based on fixed point analysis and excess risk curvature · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2021
Data mining › clustering › mixture modeling
gaussian mixture model
0.112021
Learning with semi-definite programming: statistical bounds based on fixed point analysis and excess risk curvature · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2021
Graph algorithms and graph theory › graph clustering
community detection
0.112021
Learning with semi-definite programming: statistical bounds based on fixed point analysis and excess risk curvature · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2021
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › federated learning
model aggregation
0.112011
Hyper-Sparse Optimal Aggregation · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2011
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › regularization › spectral regularization
nuclear norm regularization
0.112011
Sharp Oracle Inequalities for High-Dimensional Matrix Prediction · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2011
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
regularization
0.112011
Sharp Oracle Inequalities for High-Dimensional Matrix Prediction · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2011
Machine learning › Learning theory
classification
0.112007
Suboptimality of Penalized Empirical Risk Minimization in Classification · COLT 2007
Machine learning › Learning theory
empirical risk minimization
0.112007
Suboptimality of Penalized Empirical Risk Minimization in Classification · COLT 2007
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
classifier combination
0.112006
Optimal Oracle Inequality for Aggregation of Classifiers Under Low Noise Condition · COLT 2006
Information theory › estimation theory
density estimation
0.112006
Lower Bounds and Aggregation in Density Estimation · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2006
Information theory › estimation theory › minimax estimation
minimax lower bounds
0.112006
Lower Bounds and Aggregation in Density Estimation · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2006
Machine learning › Learning theory
matrix completion
0.012011
Sharp Oracle Inequalities for High-Dimensional Matrix Prediction · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2011
Mathematical optimization
sparse optimization
0.012011
Hyper-Sparse Optimal Aggregation · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2011

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

excess risk curvature · 1.5fixed point analysis · 1.0empirical risk minimization · 0.9regularization · 0.8minmax MOM · 0.8fixed-point analysis · 0.5median-of-means · 0.4maximum mean discrepancy · 0.4kernel mean embedding · 0.4ℓp-constrained basis pursuit · 0.3null space property · 0.3gaussian matrix analysis · 0.3minimax rates · 0.3convex regularization · 0.3sparsity · 0.1l1-norm penalization · 0.1frobenius norm penalization · 0.1aggregation · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Learning with a linear loss function: excess risk and estimation bounds for ERM, minmax MOM and their regularized versions with applications to robustness in sparse PCA
abstract
Motivated by several examples, we consider a general framework of learning with linear loss functions. In this context, we provide excess risk and estimation bounds that hold with large probability for four estimators: ERM, minmax MOM and their regularized versions. These general bounds are applied for the problem of robustness in sparse PCA. In particular, we improve the state of the art result for this this problems, obtain results under weak moment assumptions as well as for adversarial contaminated data.
Guillaume Lecué, Lucie Neirac
J. Mach. Learn. Res.1
2021 Learning with semi-definite programming: statistical bounds based on fixed point analysis and excess risk curvature
abstract
Many statistical learning problems have recently been shown to be amenable to Semi-Definite Programming (SDP), with community detection and clustering in Gaussian mixture models as the most striking instances Javanmard et al. (2016). Given the growing range of applications of SDP-based techniques to machine learning problems, and the rapid progress in the design of efficient algorithms for solving SDPs, an intriguing question is to understand how the recent advances from empirical process theory and Statistical Learning Theory can be leveraged for providing a precise statistical analysis of SDP estimators. In the present paper, we borrow cutting edge techniques and concepts from the Learning Theory literature, such as fixed point equations and excess risk curvature arguments, which yield general estimation and prediction results for a wide class of SDP estimators. From this perspective, we revisit some classical results in community detection from Guédon and Vershynin (2016) and Fei and Chen (2019), and we obtain statistical guarantees for SDP estimators used in signed clustering, angular group synchronization (for both multiplicative and additive models) and MAX-CUT. Our theoretical findings are complemented by numerical experiments for each of the three problems considered, showcasing the competitiveness of the SDP estimators.
Stéphane Chrétien, Mihai Cucuringu, Guillaume Lecué, Lucie Neirac
J. Mach. Learn. Res.3
2020 Robust classification via MOM minimization
Guillaume Lecué, Matthieu Lerasle, Timothée Mathieu
Mach. Learn.1
2020 Correction to: Robust classification via MOM minimization
Guillaume Lecué, Matthieu Lerasle, Timothée Mathieu
Mach. Learn.1
2019 MONK Outlier-Robust Mean Embedding Estimation by Median-of-Means
abstract
Mean embeddings provide an extremely flexible and powerful tool in machine learning and statistics to represent probability distributions and define a semi-metric (MMD, maximum mean discrepancy; also called N-distance or energy distance), with numerous successful applications. The representation is constructed as the expectation of the feature map defined by a kernel. As a mean, its classical empirical estimator, however, can be arbitrary severely affected even by a single outlier in case of unbounded features. To the best of our knowledge, unfortunately even the consistency of the existing few techniques trying to alleviate this serious sensitivity bottleneck is unknown. In this paper, we show how the recently emerged principle of median-of-means can be used to design estimators for kernel mean embedding and MMD with excessive resistance properties to outliers, and optimal sub-Gaussian deviation bounds under mild assumptions.
Matthieu Lerasle, Timothée Mathieu, Guillaume Lecué
ICML4
2018 On the Gap Between Restricted Isometry Properties and Sparse Recovery Conditions
abstract
We consider the problem of recovering sparse vectors from underdetermined linear measurements via ℓp-constrained basis pursuit. Previous analyses of this problem based on generalized restricted isometry properties have suggested that two phenomena occur if p ≠ 2. First, one may need substantially more than s log(en/s) measurements (optimal for p = 2) for uniform recovery of all s-sparse vectors. Second, the matrix that achieves recovery with the optimal number of measurements may not be Gaussian (as for p = 2). We present a new, direct analysis, which shows that in fact neither of these phenomena occur. Via a suitable version of the null space property, we show that a standard Gaussian matrix provides ℓq/ℓ1-recovery guarantees for ℓp-constrained basis pursuit in the optimal measurement regime. Our result extends to several heavier-tailed measurement matrices. As an application, we show that one can obtain a consistent reconstruction from uniform scalar quantized measurements in the optimal measurement regime.
Sjoerd Dirksen, Guillaume Lecué, Holger Rauhut
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory2
2017 Regularization and the small-ball method II: complexity dependent error rates
abstract
We study estimation properties of regularized procedures of the form $\hat f \in\arg\min_{f\in F}\Big(\frac{1}{N}\sum_{i=1}^N\big(Y_i-f(X_i)\big)^2+\lambda \Psi(f)\Big)$ for a convex class of functions $F$, regularization function $\Psi(\cdot)$ and some well chosen regularization parameter $\lambda$, where the given data is an independent sample $(X_i, Y_i)_{i=1}^N$. We obtain bounds on the $L_2$ estimation error rate that depend on the complexity of the true model $F^*:=\{f\in F: \Psi(f)\leq\Psi(f^*)\}$, where $f^*\in\arg\min_{f\in F}\mathbb{E}(Y-f(X))^2$ and the $(X_i,Y_i)$'s are independent and distributed as $(X,Y)$. Our estimate holds under weak stochastic assumptions -- one of which being a small-ball condition satisfied by $F$ -- and for rather flexible choices of regularization functions $\Psi(\cdot)$. Moreover, the result holds in the learning theory framework: we do not assume any a-priori connection between the output $Y$ and the input $X$. As a proof of concept, we apply our general estimation bound to various choices of $\Psi$, for example, the $\ell_p$ and $S_p$-norms (for $p\geq1$), weak-$\ell_p$, atomic norms, max- norm and SLOPE. In many cases, the estimation rate almost coincides with the minimax rate in the class $F^*$.
Guillaume Lecué, Shahar Mendelson
J. Mach. Learn. Res.1
2017 An IHT Algorithm for Sparse Recovery From Subexponential Measurements
abstract
A matrix whose entries are independent subexponential random variables is not likely to satisfy the classical restricted isometry property in the optimal regime of parameters. However, it is known that uniform sparse recovery is still possible with high probability in the optimal regime if ones uses l1-minimization as a recovery algorithm. We show in this letter that such a statement remains valid if one uses a new variation of iterative hard thresholding as a recovery algorithm. The argument is based on a modified restricted isometry property featuring the l1-norm as the inner norm.
Simon Foucart, Guillaume Lecué
IEEE Signal Process. Lett.2
2011 Hyper-Sparse Optimal Aggregation
Stéphane Gaïffas, Guillaume Lecué
J. Mach. Learn. Res.2
2011 Sharp Oracle Inequalities for High-Dimensional Matrix Prediction
abstract
We observe (Xi,Yi)i=1nwhere the Yi's are real valued outputs and the Xi's are m × T matrices. We observe a new entryXand we want to predict the outputYassociated with it. We focus on the high-dimensional setting, where mT ≫ n. This includes the matrix completion problem with noise, as well as other problems. We consider linear prediction procedures based on different penalizations, involving a mixture of several norms: the nuclear norm, the Frobenius norm and theℓ1-norm. For these procedures, we prove sharp oracle inequalities, using a statistical learning theory point of view. A surprising fact in our results is that the rates of convergence do not depend on m and T directly. The analysis is conducted without the usually considered incoherency condition on the unknown matrix or restricted isometry condition on the sampling operator. Moreover, our results are the first to give for this problem an analysis of penalization (such as nuclear norm penalization) as a regularization algorithm: our oracle inequalities prove that these procedures have a prediction accuracy close to the deterministic oracle one, given that the reguralization parameters are well-chosen.
Stéphane Gaïffas, Guillaume Lecué
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory2
2007 Suboptimality of Penalized Empirical Risk Minimization in Classification
Guillaume Lecué
COLT1
2006 Optimal Oracle Inequality for Aggregation of Classifiers Under Low Noise Condition
Guillaume Lecué
COLT1
2006 Lower Bounds and Aggregation in Density Estimation
abstract
In this paper we prove the optimality of an aggregation procedure. We prove lower bounds for aggregation of model selection type of M density estimators for the Kullback-Leibler divergence (KL), the Hellinger's distance and the L1-distance. The lower bound, with respect to the KL distance, can be achieved by the on-line type estimate suggested, among others, by Yang (2000a). Combining these results, we state that log M/n is an optimal rate of aggregation in the sense of Tsybakov (2003), where n is the sample size.
Guillaume Lecué
J. Mach. Learn. Res.1