Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Srinivas Gazula
dblp:99/5553
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1995
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Learning theory · 50% Deep learning architectures and training · 50% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Data mining · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
boolean neural network |
0.0 | 1 | 1995 | Design of Supervised Classifiers Using Boolean Neural Networks · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1995 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › classification
neural network classifier |
0.0 | 1 | 1995 | Design of Supervised Classifiers Using Boolean Neural Networks · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1995 |
Data mining › predictive modeling
classification |
0.0 | 1 | 1995 | Design of Supervised Classifiers Using Boolean Neural Networks · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1995 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
radius of attraction · 0.0k-nearest neighbors · 0.0k-nearest neighbor · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1995 | Design of Supervised Classifiers Using Boolean Neural NetworksabstractIn this paper we present two supervised pattern classifiers designed using Boolean neural networks. They are: 1) nearest-to-an-exemplar classifier; and 2) Boolean k-nearest neighbor classifier. The emphasis during the design of these classifiers was on simplicity, robustness, and the ease of hardware implementation. The classifiers use the idea of radius of attraction to achieve their goal. Mathematical analysis of the algorithms presented in the paper is done to prove their feasibility. Both classifiers are tested with well-known binary and continuous feature valued data sets yielding results comparable with those obtained by similar existing classifiers. Srinivas Gazula, Mansur R. Kabuka |
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. | 1 |