Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Yakir Berchenko

dblp:99/7421 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
4as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0002-9786-4061ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Learning theory · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Graph algorithms and graph theory · 50% Information theory · 50%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Learning theory › inductive bias
simplicity bias
0.812024
Simplicity Bias in Overparameterized Machine Learning · AAAI 2024
Information theory › statistical inference
missing data
0.412020
Random Intersection Graphs and Missing Data · AAAI 2020
Graph algorithms and graph theory › random graphs
random intersection graphs
0.412020
Random Intersection Graphs and Missing Data · AAAI 2020
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Simplicity Bias in Overparameterized Machine Learning
abstract
A thorough theoretical understanding of the surprising generalization ability of deep networks (and other overparameterized models) is still lacking. Here we demonstrate that simplicity bias is a major phenomenon to be reckoned with in overparameterized machine learning. In addition to explaining the outcome of simplicity bias, we also study its source: following concrete rigorous examples, we argue that (i) simplicity bias can explain generalization in overparameterized learning models such as neural networks; (ii) simplicity bias and excellent generalization are optimizer-independent, as our example shows, and although the optimizer affects training, it is not the driving force behind simplicity bias; (iii) simplicity bias in pre-training models, and subsequent posteriors, is universal and stems from the subtle fact that uniformly-at-random constructed priors are not uniformly-at-random sampled ; and (iv) in neural network models, the biasing mechanism in wide (and shallow) networks is different from the biasing mechanism in deep (and narrow) networks.
Yakir Berchenko
AAAI1
2020 Random Intersection Graphs and Missing Data
Dror Salti, Yakir Berchenko
AAAI2
2011 Intra-Firm Information Flow: A Content-Structure Perspective
Yakir Berchenko, Or Daliot, Nir N. Brueller
IDA1
2009 Greedy Convex Embeddings for Sensor Networks
abstract
Recent advances in systems of networked sensors have set the stage for smart environments which will have wide-ranging applications from intelligent wildlife monitoring to social applications such as health and elderly care service provisioning. Perhaps the most natural problem in sensor systems is the ¿efficient¿ propagation of a sensed local event. In order to address this problem, the notion of greedy embedding was defined by Papadimitriou and Ratajczak, where the authors conjectured that every 3-connected planar graph has a greedy embedding (possibly planar and convex) in the Euclidean plane. Recently, the greedy embedding conjecture was proved by Leighton and Moitra. However, their algorithm does not result in a drawing that is planar and convex in the Euclidean plane for all 3-connected planar graphs. Here we give a random algorithm for embedding 3-connected planar graphs a greedy convex embedding. Our convex embedding is especially useful for the case of sensor networks, where the position assigned to each sensor is the midpoint of the positions of its neighbors.
Yakir Berchenko, Mina Teicher
PDCAT1
2009 Greedy Convex Embeddings for Ad-Hoc Networks
abstract
Recent advances in networked systems and wireless communications have set the stage for applications with wide-ranging benefits. Perhaps the most natural problem in such systems is the ¿efficient¿ propagation of locally stored data. In order to address this problem, the notion of greedy embedding was defined by Papadimitriou and Ratajczak, where the authors conjectured that every 3-connected planar graph has a greedy embedding (possibly planar and convex) in the Euclidean plane. Recently, the greedy embedding conjecture was proved by Leighton and Moitra. However, their algorithm does not result in a drawing that is planar and convex in the Euclidean plane for all 3-connected planar graphs. Here we consider the planar convex greedy embedding conjecture and give a probabilistic proof for the existence of such embeddings. In addition, we discuss a second proof which is almost immediate in the case of an embedding into the 3-dimensional sphere.
Yakir Berchenko, Mina Teicher
PDCAT1