Todor Tsankov

dblp:99/8908 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 4 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Continuous Logic and Borel Equivalence Relations
abstract
Abstract We study the complexity of isomorphism of classes of metric structures using methods from infinitary continuous logic. For Borel classes of locally compact structures, we prove that if the equivalence relation of isomorphism is potentially $\mathbf {\Sigma }^0_2$ , then it is essentially countable. We also provide an equivalent model-theoretic condition that is easy to check in practice. This theorem is a common generalization of a result of Hjorth about pseudo-connected metric spaces and a result of Hjorth–Kechris about discrete structures. As a different application, we also give a new proof of Kechris’s theorem that orbit equivalence relations of actions of Polish locally compact groups are essentially countable.
Andreas Hallbäck, Maciej Malicki, Todor Tsankov
J. Symb. Log.3
2013 Decidability of definability
abstract
Abstract For a fixed countably infinite structure Γ with finite relational signature τ, we study the following computational problem: input are quantifier-free τ-formulas ϕ0, ϕ1, …, ϕn that define relations R0, R1, …, Rn over Γ. The question is whether the relation R0 is primitive positive definable from R1, …, Rn, i.e., definable by a first-order formula that uses only relation symbols for R1, …, Rn, equality, conjunctions, and existential quantification (disjunction, negation, and universal quantification are forbidden). We show decidability of this problem for all structures Γ that have a first-order definition in an ordered homogeneous structure Δ with a finite relational signature whose age is a Ramsey class and determined by finitely many forbidden substructures. Examples of structures Γ with this property are the order of the rationals, the random graph, the homogeneous universal poset, the random tournament, all homogeneous universal C-relations, and many more. We also obtain decidability of the problem when we replace primitive positive definability by existential positive, or existential definability. Our proof makes use of universal algebraic and model theoretic concepts, Ramsey theory, and a recent characterization of Ramsey classes in topological dynamics.
Manuel Bodirsky, Michael Pinsker, Todor Tsankov
J. Symb. Log.3
2011 Decidability of Definability
abstract
For a fixed infinite structure Γ with finite signature τ, we study the following computational problem: input are quantifier-free first-order τ-formulas φ0, φ1,..., φnthat define relations R0, R1,..., Rnover Γ. The question is whether the relation R0is primitive positive definable from R1,..., Rn, i.e., definable by a first-order formula that uses only relation symbols for R1,..., Rn, equality, conjunctions, and existential quantification (disjunction, negation, and universal quantification are forbidden). We show decidability of this problem for all structures Γ that have a first-order definition in an ordered homogeneous structure Δ with a finite language whose age is a Ramsey class and determined by finitely many forbidden substructures. Examples for structures Γ with this property are the order of the rationals, the random graph, the homogeneous universal poset, the random tournament, all homogeneous universal C-relations, and many more. We also obtain decidability of the problem when we replace primitive positive definability by existential positive, or existential definability. Our proof makes use of universal algebraic and model theoretic concepts, Ramsey theory, and a recent characterization of Ramsey classes in topological dynamics.
Manuel Bodirsky, Michael Pinsker, Todor Tsankov
LICS3
2011 The additive group of the rationals does not have an automatic presentation
abstract
Abstract We prove that the additive group of the rationals does not have an automatic presentation. The proof also applies to certain other abelian groups, for example, torsion-free groups that are p-divisible for infinitely many primes p, or groups of the form ⊕pϵIZ(p∞), where I is an infinite set of primes.
Todor Tsankov
J. Symb. Log.1