VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Demissie B. Aredo
dblp:a/DemissieBAredo
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2004
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 4Theory of computation · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Program verification · 33% Requirements engineering and software design · 33% Software maintenance and evolution · 33% | |
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Systems and software security · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Program verification
model-based verification |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Enhancing Structured Review with Model-Based Verification · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2004 |
Software maintenance and evolution
software inspection |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Enhancing Structured Review with Model-Based Verification · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2004 |
Requirements engineering and software design
UML model verification |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Enhancing Structured Review with Model-Based Verification · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2004 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
lightweight formal methods · 0.1UML · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 | An integrated framework for formal development of open distributed systems
Issa Traoré, Demissie B. Aredo |
Inf. Softw. Technol. | 2 |
| 2004 | Enhancing Structured Review with Model-Based VerificationabstractWe propose a development framework that extends the scope of structured review by supplementing the structured review with model-based verification. The proposed approach uses the Unified Modeling Language (UML) as a modeling notation. We discuss a set of correctness arguments that can be used in conjunction with formal verification and validation (V&V) in order to improve the quality and dependability of systems in a cost-effective way. Formal methods can be esoteric; consequently, their large scale application is hindered. We propose a framework based on the integration of lightweight formal methods and structured reviews. Moreover, we show that structured reviews enable us to handle aspects of V&V that cannot be fully automated. To demonstrate the feasibility of our approach, we have conducted a study on a security-critical system - a patient document service (PDS) system. Issa Traoré, Demissie B. Aredo |
IEEE Trans. Software Eng. | 2 |
| 2002 | Combining Graphical and Formal Development of Open Distributed Systems
Einar Broch Johnsen, Olaf Owe, Demissie B. Aredo |
IFM | 4 |
| 2001 | Specification of Distributed Systems with a Combination of Graphica and Formal LanguagesabstractConvenience in specification and possibility for formal analysis are, to some extent, exclusive aspects of system specification. This paper describes an approach that emphasizes both aspects, by combining UML with a language for observable behavior of interfaces, OUN. These are complementary in the sense that one is graphical and semi-formal while the other is textual and formal. The approach is demonstrated by a case study. Einar Broch Johnsen, Olaf Owe, Demissie B. Aredo |
APSEC | 4 |