Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.

Thomas H. Dunigan

dblp:d/TomDunigan · also Thomas H. Dunigan Jr., Tom Dunigan · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
9ranked-venue papers
5as first author
0since 2021 · last 2006
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 9 · 5 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
3 papers
Performance modeling and evaluation · 56% High-performance computing · 44%
Computer networks
1 paper
Transport protocols and congestion control · 50% Network management and operations · 50%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Performance modeling and evaluation
benchmarking
0.122003
Early Evaluation of the Cray X1 · SC 2003
Early evaluation of the IBM p690 · SC 2002
Performance modeling and evaluation › system-level analysis
architecture evaluation
0.022003
Early evaluation of the IBM p690 · SC 2002
Early Evaluation of the Cray X1 · SC 2003
High-performance computing
supercomputing
0.012003
Early Evaluation of the Cray X1 · SC 2003
Transport protocols and congestion control › TCP performance enhancement
TCP tuning
0.012002
A TCP tuning daemon · SC 2002
High-performance computing › supercomputing
supercomputing systems
0.012002
Early evaluation of the IBM p690 · SC 2002
High-performance computing
performance optimization at scale
0.012003
Early Evaluation of the Cray X1 · SC 2003

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

kernel-level tuning · 0.1TCP instrumentation · 0.1microbenchmarking · 0.0application code evaluation · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2006 Early evaluation of the Cray XT3
abstract
Oak Ridge National Laboratory recently received delivery of a 5,294 processor Cray XT3. The XT3 is Cray's third-generation massively parallel processing system. The system builds on a single processor node - built around the AMD Opteron - and uses a custom chip - called SeaStar - to provide interprocess or communication. In addition, the system uses a lightweight operating system on the compute nodes. This paper describes our initial experiences with the system, including micro-benchmark, kernel, and application benchmark results. In particular, we provide performance results for strategic Department of Energy applications areas including climate and fusion. We demonstrate experiments on the installed system, scaling applications up to 4,096 processors.
Jeffrey S. Vetter, Sadaf R. Alam, Thomas H. Dunigan, Mark R. Fahey, Philip C. Roth, Patrick H. Worley
IPDPS3
2005 Performance Evaluation of the SGI Altix 3700
abstract
SGI recently introduced the Altix 3700. In contrast to previous SGI systems, the Altix uses a modified version of the open source Linux operating system and the latest Intel IA-64 processors, the Intel Itanium2. The Altix also uses the next generation SGI interconnect, Numalink3 and NUMAflex, which provides a NUMA, cache-coherent, shared memory, multi-processor system. In this paper, we present a performance evaluation of the SGI Altix using microbenchmarks, kernels, and mission applications. We find that the Altix provides many advantages over other non-vector machines and it is competitive with the Cray XI on a number of kernels and applications. The Altix also shows good scaling, and its globally shared memory allows users convenient parallelization with OpenMP or pthreads.
Thomas H. Dunigan, Jeffrey S. Vetter, Patrick H. Worley
ICPP1
2003 Early Evaluation of the Cray X1
abstract
Oak Ridge National Laboratory installed a 32 processor Cray X1 in March, 2003, and will have a 256 processor system installed by October, 2003. In this paper we describe our initial evaluation of the X1 architecture, focusing on microbenchmarks, kernels, and application codes that highlight the performance characteristics of the X1 architecture and indicate how to use the system most efficiently.
Thomas H. Dunigan, Mark R. Fahey, James B. White III, Patrick H. Worley
SC1
2002 A TCP tuning daemon
abstract
Many high performance distributed applications require high network throughput but are able to achieve only a small fraction of the available bandwidth. A common cause of this problem is improperly tuned network settings. Tuning techniques, such as setting the correct TCP buffers and using parallel streams, are well known in the networking community, but outside the networking community they are infrequently applied. In this paper, we describe a tuning daemon that uses TCP instrumentation data from the Unix kernel to transparently tune TCP parameters for specified individual flows over designated paths. No modifications are required to the application, and the user does not need to understand network or TCP characteristics.
Thomas H. Dunigan, Matthew Mathis, Brian Tierney
SC1
2002 Early evaluation of the IBM p690
abstract
Oak Ridge National Laboratory recently received 27 32-way IBM pSeries 690 SMP nodes. In this paper, we describe our initial evaluation of the p690 architecture, focusing on the performance of benchmarks and applications that are representative of the expected production workload.
Patrick H. Worley, Thomas H. Dunigan, Mark R. Fahey, James B. White III, Arthur S. Bland
SC2
1998 The Locally Self-Consistent Multiple Scattering Code in a Geographically Distributed Linked MPP Environment
Timothy J. Sheehan, William A. Shelton, Thomas J. Pratt, Philip M. Papadopoulos, Philip F. LoCascio, Thomas H. Dunigan
Parallel Comput.6
1997 Message-Passing Performance of Various Computers
abstract
This report compares the performance of different computer systems for basic message passing. Latency and bandwidth are measured on Convex, Cray, IBM, Intel, KSR, Meiko, nCUBE, NEC, SGI and TMC multiprocessors. Communication performance is contrasted with the computational power of each system. The comparison includes both shared and distributed memory computers as well as networked workstation clusters. © 1997 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Jack J. Dongarra, Thomas H. Dunigan
Concurr. Pract. Exp.2
1992 Hypercube clock synchronization
abstract
Abstract Algorithms for synchronizing the times and frequencies of the clocks of Intel and Ncube hypercube multiprocessors are presented. Bounds for the error in estimating clock offsets and frequencies are formulated in terms of the clock read error and message transmission time. Clock and communication performance of the Ncube and Intel hypercubes are analysed, and performance of the synchronization algorithms is presented.
Thomas H. Dunigan
Concurr. Pract. Exp.1
1991 Performance of the Intel iPSC/860 and Ncube 6400 hypercubes
Thomas H. Dunigan
Parallel Comput.1