Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Michael Fink 0002
dblp:f/MFink2
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
5as first author
0since 2021 · last 2008
0000-0003-1166-9343ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 4 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
5 papers |
Learning theory · 40% Image recognition and object detection · 36% Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 7% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 100% |
Topics — the 14 heaviest of 17, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
image classification |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | From Aardvark to Zorro: A Benchmark for Mammal Image Classification · Int. J. Comput. Vis. 2008 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › classification
multiclass classification |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Uncovering shared structures in multiclass classification · ICML 2007 |
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization
convex optimization |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Uncovering shared structures in multiclass classification · ICML 2007 |
Mathematical optimization › regularization › low-rank regularization
trace-norm regularization |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Uncovering shared structures in multiclass classification · ICML 2007 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › online learning › mistake bounds
mistake bound analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Online multiclass learning by interclass hypothesis sharing · ICML 2006 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
online learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Online multiclass learning by interclass hypothesis sharing · ICML 2006 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › online learning › online classification
online multiclass prediction |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Online multiclass learning by interclass hypothesis sharing · ICML 2006 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
few-shot learning |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Object Classification from a Single Example Utilizing Class Relevance Metrics · NIPS 2004 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
metric learning |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Object Classification from a Single Example Utilizing Class Relevance Metrics · NIPS 2004 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › image classification
object classification |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Object Classification from a Single Example Utilizing Class Relevance Metrics · NIPS 2004 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › object detection
contextual reasoning |
0.0 | 1 | 2003 | Mutual Boosting for Contextual Inference · NIPS 2003 |
Computer vision › Face, body and person analysis
face detection |
0.0 | 1 | 2003 | Mutual Boosting for Contextual Inference · NIPS 2003 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
object detection |
0.0 | 1 | 2003 | Mutual Boosting for Contextual Inference · NIPS 2003 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › multi-task learning
shared structure learning |
0.0 | 1 | 2007 | Uncovering shared structures in multiclass classification · ICML 2007 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
trace norm regularization · 0.1kernel methods · 0.1gradient-based optimization · 0.1perceptron · 0.1mistake bound analysis · 0.1nearest neighbor classification · 0.0kernel-based metric learning · 0.0mutual boosting · 0.0adaboost · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | From Aardvark to Zorro: A Benchmark for Mammal Image Classification
Michael Fink 0002, Shimon Ullman |
Int. J. Comput. Vis. | 1 |
| 2008 | Mass personalization: social and interactive applications using sound-track identification
Michael Fink 0002, Michele Covell, Shumeet Baluja |
Multim. Tools Appl. | 1 |
| 2007 | Uncovering shared structures in multiclass classificationabstractThis paper suggests a method for multiclass learning with many classes by simultaneously learning shared characteristics common to the classes, and predictors for the classes in terms of these characteristics. We cast this as a convex optimization problem, using trace-norm regularization and study gradient-based optimization both for the linear case and the kernelized setting. Yonatan Amit, Michael Fink 0002, Nathan Srebro, Shimon Ullman |
ICML | 2 |
| 2006 | Online multiclass learning by interclass hypothesis sharingabstractWe describe a general framework for online multiclass learning based on the notion of hypothesis sharing. In our framework sets of classes are associated with hypotheses. Thus, all classes within a given set share the same hypothesis. This framework includes as special cases commonly used constructions for multiclass categorization such as allocating a unique hypothesis for each class and allocating a single common hypothesis for all classes. We generalize the multiclass Perceptron to our framework and derive a unifying mistake bound analysis. Our construction naturally extends to settings where the number of classes is not known in advance but rather is revealed along the online learning process. We demonstrate the merits of our approach by comparing it to previous methods on both synthetic and natural datasets. 1. Michael Fink 0002, Shai Shalev-Shwartz, Yoram Singer, Shimon Ullman |
ICML | 1 |
| 2006 | Advertisement Detection and Replacement using Acoustic and Visual RepetitionabstractIn this paper, we propose a method for detecting and precisely segmenting repeated sections of broadcast streams. This method allows advertisements to be removed and replaced with new ads in redistributed television material. The detection stage starts from acoustic matches and validates the hypothesized matches using the visual channel. Finally, the precise segmentation uses fine-grain acoustic match profiles to determine start and end-points. The approach is both efficient and robust to broadcast noise and differences in broadcaster signals. Our final result is nearly perfect, with better than 99% precision, at a recall rate of 95% for repeated advertisements Michele Covell, Shumeet Baluja, Michael Fink 0002 |
MMSP | 3 |
| 2004 | Object Classification from a Single Example Utilizing Class Relevance MetricsabstractWe describe a framework for learning an object classifier from a single example. This goal is achieved by emphasizing the relevant dimensions for classification using available examples of related classes. Learning to accurately classify objects from a single training example is often un- feasible due to overfitting effects. However, if the instance representa- tion provides that the distance between each two instances of the same class is smaller than the distance between any two instances from dif- ferent classes, then a nearest neighbor classifier could achieve perfect performance with a single training example. We therefore suggest a two stage strategy. First, learn a metric over the instances that achieves the distance criterion mentioned above, from available examples of other related classes. Then, using the single examples, define a nearest neigh- bor classifier where distance is evaluated by the learned class relevance metric. Finding a metric that emphasizes the relevant dimensions for classification might not be possible when restricted to linear projections. We therefore make use of a kernel based metric learning algorithm. Our setting encodes object instances as sets of locality based descriptors and adopts an appropriate image kernel for the class relevance metric learn- ing. The proposed framework for learning from a single example is demonstrated in a synthetic setting and on a character classification task. Michael Fink 0002 |
NIPS | 1 |
| 2003 | Mutual Boosting for Contextual InferenceabstractMutual Boosting is a method aimed at incorporating contextual information to augment object detection. When multiple detectors of objects and parts are trained in parallel using AdaBoost [1], object detectors might use the remaining intermediate detectors to enrich the weak learner set. This method generalizes the efficient features suggested by Viola and Jones thus enabling information inference between parts and objects in a compositional hierarchy. In our experiments eye-, nose-, mouth- and face detectors are trained using the Mutual Boosting framework. Results show the method outperforms applications overlooking contextual information. We suggest that achieving contextual integration is a step toward human-like detection capabilities. Michael Fink 0002, Pietro Perona |
NIPS | 1 |