VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Dilan Görür
dblp:g/DilanGorur
· DBLP profile ↗
11ranked-venue papers
3as first author
3since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 10 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
10 papers |
Learning paradigms · 29% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 22% Reinforcement learning · 21% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 29 heaviest of 31, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
continual learning |
1.1 | 2 | 2022 | Wide Neural Networks Forget Less Catastrophically · ICML 2022 Linear Mode Connectivity in Multitask and Continual Learning · ICLR 2021 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › belief revision
forgetting |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Is Forgetting Less a Good Inductive Bias for Forward Transfer? · ICLR 2023 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › lifelong learning
forward transfer |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Is Forgetting Less a Good Inductive Bias for Forward Transfer? · ICLR 2023 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › loss landscape
loss landscape geometry |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Linear Mode Connectivity in Multitask and Continual Learning · ICLR 2021 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
multi-task learning |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Linear Mode Connectivity in Multitask and Continual Learning · ICLR 2021 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › markov decision process › infinite-horizon markov decision process
average-reward MDP |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | A Maximum-Entropy Approach to Off-Policy Evaluation in Average-Reward MDPs · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › markov decision process › low-rank MDP
linear MDP |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | A Maximum-Entropy Approach to Off-Policy Evaluation in Average-Reward MDPs · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
markov decision process |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | A Maximum-Entropy Approach to Off-Policy Evaluation in Average-Reward MDPs · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › exponential family
maximum entropy models |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | A Maximum-Entropy Approach to Off-Policy Evaluation in Average-Reward MDPs · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
off-policy evaluation |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | A Maximum-Entropy Approach to Off-Policy Evaluation in Average-Reward MDPs · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
density estimation |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Do Deep Generative Models Know What They Don't Know? · ICLR (Poster) 2019 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › normalizing flow
invertible transformation |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Hybrid Models with Deep and Invertible Features · ICML 2019 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
normalizing flow |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Hybrid Models with Deep and Invertible Features · ICML 2019 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
out-of-distribution detection |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Do Deep Generative Models Know What They Don't Know? · ICLR (Poster) 2019 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference
bayesian nonparametric model |
0.2 | 3 | 2009 | Indian Buffet Processes with Power-law Behavior · NIPS 2009 Dependent Dirichlet Process Spike Sorting · NIPS 2008 A choice model with infinitely many latent features · ICML 2006 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › continual learning
catastrophic forgetting |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Wide Neural Networks Forget Less Catastrophically · ICML 2022 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference › bayesian nonparametric model
indian buffet process |
0.2 | 2 | 2009 | Indian Buffet Processes with Power-law Behavior · NIPS 2009 A choice model with infinitely many latent features · ICML 2006 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
stochastic processes |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Indian Buffet Processes with Power-law Behavior · NIPS 2009 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
clustering |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | An Efficient Sequential Monte Carlo Algorithm for Coalescent Clustering · NIPS 2008 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference › bayesian nonparametric model › dirichlet process
dependent dirichlet process |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Dependent Dirichlet Process Spike Sorting · NIPS 2008 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference › bayesian nonparametric model
dirichlet process |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Dependent Dirichlet Process Spike Sorting · NIPS 2008 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods
monte carlo estimation |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | An Efficient Sequential Monte Carlo Algorithm for Coalescent Clustering · NIPS 2008 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods
sequential monte carlo |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | An Efficient Sequential Monte Carlo Algorithm for Coalescent Clustering · NIPS 2008 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
computational neuroscience |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Dependent Dirichlet Process Spike Sorting · NIPS 2008 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › neuroscience › neuroinformatics › neural data analysis
spike sorting |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Dependent Dirichlet Process Spike Sorting · NIPS 2008 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
choice modeling |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | A choice model with infinitely many latent features · ICML 2006 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods
markov chain monte carlo |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | A choice model with infinitely many latent features · ICML 2006 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › latent variable model › mixture model
gaussian mixture model |
0.0 | 1 | 2008 | Dependent Dirichlet Process Spike Sorting · NIPS 2008 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
population genetics |
0.0 | 1 | 2008 | An Efficient Sequential Monte Carlo Algorithm for Coalescent Clustering · NIPS 2008 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
lazy training regime · 0.6gradient orthogonality analysis · 0.6mode connectivity analysis · 0.5maximum entropy · 0.4function approximation · 0.4time-varying dirichlet process · 0.2sequential monte carlo inference · 0.2interspike-interval-dependent likelihood · 0.2beta process generalization · 0.1elimination by aspects · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Is Forgetting Less a Good Inductive Bias for Forward Transfer?
Jiefeng Chen 0001, Timothy Nguyen, Dilan Görür, Arslan Chaudhry |
ICLR | 3 |
| 2022 | Wide Neural Networks Forget Less CatastrophicallyabstractA primary focus area in continual learning research is alleviating the "catastrophic forgetting" problem in neural networks by designing new algorithms that are more robust to the distribution shifts. While the recent progress in continual learning literature is encouraging, our understanding of what properties of neural networks contribute to catastrophic forgetting is still limited. To address this, instead of focusing on continual learning algorithms, in this work, we focus on the model itself and study the impact of "width" of the neural network architecture on catastrophic forgetting, and show that width has a surprisingly significant effect on forgetting. To explain this effect, we study the learning dynamics of the network from various perspectives such as gradient orthogonality, sparsity, and lazy training regime. We provide potential explanations that are consistent with the empirical results across different architectures and continual learning benchmarks. Seyed-Iman Mirzadeh, Arslan Chaudhry, Huiyi Hu, Razvan Pascanu, Dilan Görür, Mehrdad Farajtabar |
ICML | 6 |
| 2021 | Linear Mode Connectivity in Multitask and Continual Learning
Seyed-Iman Mirzadeh, Mehrdad Farajtabar, Dilan Görür, Razvan Pascanu, Hassan Ghasemzadeh 0001 |
ICLR | 3 |
| 2020 | A Maximum-Entropy Approach to Off-Policy Evaluation in Average-Reward MDPsabstractThis work focuses on off-policy evaluation (OPE) with function approximation in infinite-horizon undiscounted Markov decision processes (MDPs). For MDPs that are ergodic and linear (i.e. where rewards and dynamics are linear in some known features), we provide the first finite-sample OPE error bound, extending the existing results beyond the episodic and discounted cases. In a more general setting, when the feature dynamics are approximately linear and for arbitrary rewards, we propose a new approach for estimating stationary distributions with function approximation. We formulate this problem as finding the maximum-entropy distribution subject to matching feature expectations under empirical dynamics. We show that this results in an exponential-family distribution whose sufficient statistics are the features, paralleling maximum-entropy approaches in supervised learning. We demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed OPE approaches in multiple environments. Nevena Lazic, Mehrdad Farajtabar, Nir Levine, Dilan Görür, Chris Harris 0001, Dale Schuurmans |
NeurIPS | 5 |
| 2019 | Do Deep Generative Models Know What They Don't Know?
Eric T. Nalisnick, Akihiro Matsukawa, Yee Whye Teh, Dilan Görür, Balaji Lakshminarayanan |
ICLR (Poster) | 4 |
| 2019 | Hybrid Models with Deep and Invertible FeaturesabstractWe propose a neural hybrid model consisting of a linear model defined on a set of features computed by a deep, invertible transformation (i.e. a normalizing flow). An attractive property of our model is that both p(features), the density of the features, and p(targets|features), the predictive distribution, can be computed exactly in a single feed-forward pass. We show that our hybrid model, despite the invertibility constraints, achieves similar accuracy to purely predictive models. Yet the generative component remains a good model of the input features despite the hybrid optimization objective. This offers additional capabilities such as detection of out-of-distribution inputs and enabling semi-supervised learning. The availability of the exact joint density p(targets, features) also allows us to compute many quantities readily, making our hybrid model a useful building block for downstream applications of probabilistic deep learning. Eric T. Nalisnick, Akihiro Matsukawa, Yee Whye Teh, Dilan Görür, Balaji Lakshminarayanan |
ICML | 4 |
| 2010 | Dirichlet Process Gaussian Mixture Models: Choice of the Base Distribution
Dilan Görür, Carl E. Rasmussen |
J. Comput. Sci. Technol. | 1 |
| 2009 | Indian Buffet Processes with Power-law BehaviorabstractThe Indian buffet process (IBP) is an exchangeable distribution over binary matrices used in Bayesian nonparametric featural models. In this paper we propose a three-parameter generalization of the IBP exhibiting power-law behavior. We achieve this by generalizing the beta process (the de Finetti measure of the IBP) to the \emph{stable-beta process} and deriving the IBP corresponding to it. We find interesting relationships between the stable-beta process and the Pitman-Yor process (another stochastic process used in Bayesian nonparametric models with interesting power-law properties). We show that our power-law IBP is a good model for word occurrences in documents with improved performance over the normal IBP. Yee Whye Teh, Dilan Görür |
NIPS | 2 |
| 2008 | Dependent Dirichlet Process Spike SortingabstractIn this paper we propose a new incremental spike sorting model that automatically eliminates refractory period violations, accounts for action potential waveform drift, and can handle appearance" and "disappearance" of neurons. Our approach is to augment a known time-varying Dirichlet process that ties together a sequence of infinite Gaussian mixture models, one per action potential waveform observation, with an interspike-interval-dependent likelihood that prohibits refractory period violations. We demonstrate this model by showing results from sorting two publicly available neural data recordings for which the a partial ground truth labeling is known." Jan Gasthaus, Frank D. Wood, Dilan Görür, Yee Whye Teh |
NIPS | 3 |
| 2008 | An Efficient Sequential Monte Carlo Algorithm for Coalescent ClusteringabstractWe propose an efficient sequential Monte Carlo inference scheme for the recently proposed coalescent clustering model (Teh et al, 2008). Our algorithm has a quadratic runtime while those in (Teh et al, 2008) is cubic. In experiments, we were surprised to find that in addition to being more efficient, it is also a better sequential Monte Carlo sampler than the best in (Teh et al, 2008), when measured in terms of variance of estimated likelihood and effective sample size. Dilan Görür, Yee Whye Teh |
NIPS | 1 |
| 2006 | A choice model with infinitely many latent featuresabstractElimination by aspects (EBA) is a probabilistic choice model describing how humans decide between several options. The options from which the choice is made are characterized by binary features and associated weights. For instance, when choosing which mobile phone to buy the features to consider may be: long lasting battery, color screen, etc. Existing methods for inferring the parameters of the model assume pre-specified features. However, the features that lead to the observed choices are not always known. Here, we present a non-parametric Bayesian model to infer the features of the options and the corresponding weights from choice data. We use the Indian buffet process (IBP) as a prior over the features. Inference using Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) in conjugate IBP models has been previously described. The main contribution of this paper is an MCMC algorithm for the EBA model that can also be used in inference for other non-conjugate IBP models---this may broaden the use of IBP priors considerably. Dilan Görür, Frank Jäkel, Carl E. Rasmussen |
ICML | 1 |