Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Manish S. Gupta

dblp:g/ManishGupta3 · also Manish Gupta 0003 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2011
—ORCID · conflict

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 4 · 2 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
4 papers
Graph data management · 59% Information retrieval · 20% Recommender systems · 11%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Computational social science and digital humanities · 100%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Graph data management
personalized pagerank
0.222008
Fast algorithms for topk personalized pagerank queries · WWW 2008
Index Design for Dynamic Personalized PageRank · ICDE 2008
Graph data management
graph indexing
0.112011
Index design and query processing for graph conductance search · VLDB J. 2011
Recommender systems
click-through rate prediction
0.112009
Predicting click through rate for job listings · WWW 2009
Graph data management
graph query processing
0.112008
Fast algorithms for topk personalized pagerank queries · WWW 2008
Information retrieval › indexing
index design
0.112008
Index Design for Dynamic Personalized PageRank · ICDE 2008
Information retrieval
search engines
0.112008
Index Design for Dynamic Personalized PageRank · ICDE 2008
Query processing and optimization
top-k query processing
0.112008
Fast algorithms for topk personalized pagerank queries · WWW 2008
Computational social science and digital humanities › marketing
advertising
0.012009
Predicting click through rate for job listings · WWW 2009
Graph algorithms and graph theory › centrality › pagerank
personalized pagerank
0.012008
Index Design for Dynamic Personalized PageRank · ICDE 2008

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

regression model · 0.2performance modeling · 0.2cost-benefit optimization · 0.2query processing · 0.1random surfer model · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2011 Index design and query processing for graph conductance search
Soumen Chakrabarti, Amit Pathak, Manish S. Gupta
VLDB J.3
2009 Predicting click through rate for job listings
abstract
Click Through Rate (CTR) is an important metric for ad systems, job portals, recommendation systems. CTR impacts publisher's revenue, advertiser's bid amounts in "pay for performance" business models. We learn regression models using features of the job, optional click history of job, features of "related" jobs. We show that our models predict CTR much better than predicting avg. CTR for all job listings, even in absence of the click history for the job listing.
Manish S. Gupta
WWW1
2008 Index Design for Dynamic Personalized PageRank
abstract
Personalized page rank, related to random walks with restarts and conductance in resistive networks, is a frequent search paradigm for graph-structured databases. While efficient batch algorithms exist for static whole-graph page rank, interactive query-time personalized page rank has proved more challenging. Here we describe how to select and build indices for a popular class of page rank algorithms, so as to provide real-time personalized page rank and smoothly trade off between index size, preprocessing time, and query speed. We achieve this by developing a precise, yet efficiently estimated performance model for personalized page rank query execution. We use this model in conjunction with a query workload in a cost-benefit type index optimizer. On millions of queries from CiteSeer and its data graphs with 74-320 thousand nodes, our algorithm runs 50-400 x faster than whole-graph page rank, the gap growing with graph size. Index size is 10-20% of a text index. Ranking accuracy is above 94%.
Amit Pathak, Soumen Chakrabarti, Manish S. Gupta
ICDE3
2008 Fast algorithms for topk personalized pagerank queries
abstract
In entity-relation (ER) graphs (V,E), nodes V represent typed entities and edges E represent typed relations. For dynamic personalized PageRank queries, nodes are ranked by their steady-state probabilities obtained using the standard random surfer model. In this work, we propose a framework to answer top-k graph conductance queries. Our top-k ranking technique leads to a 4X speedup, and overall, our system executes queries 200-1600X faster than whole-graph PageRank. Some queries might contain hard predicates i.e. predicates that must be satisfied by the answer nodes. E.g. we may seek authoritative papers on public key cryptography, but only those written during 1997. We extend our system to handle hard predicates. Our system achieves these substantial query speedups while consuming only 10-20% of the space taken by a regular text index.
Manish S. Gupta, Amit Pathak, Soumen Chakrabarti
WWW1