Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Richard Granger
dblp:g/RichardGranger · also Richard H. Granger
· DBLP profile ↗
20ranked-venue papers
9as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
0000-0003-3765-174XORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 16 · 8 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 9 · 4 first-author · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-authorTheory of computation · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
6 papers |
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 57% Information extraction and text analysis · 22% Time series and sequential data · 21% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology
neuroscience |
0.0 | 1 | 1987 | Partitioning of Sensory Data by a Cortical Network · NIPS 1987 |
Machine learning › Time series and sequential data › non-stationary environments
concept drift |
0.0 | 1 | 1986 | Beyond Incremental Processing: Tracking Concept Drift · AAAI 1986 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
commonsense reasoning |
0.0 | 1 | 1982 | Scruffy Text Understanding: Design and Implementation of 'Tolerant' Understanders · ACL 1982 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › commonsense reasoning
expectation-based inference |
0.0 | 1 | 1982 | Scruffy Text Understanding: Design and Implementation of 'Tolerant' Understanders · ACL 1982 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › discourse analysis › discourse processing
discourse interpretation |
0.0 | 1 | 1981 | Directing And Re-Directing Inference Pursuit: Extra-Textual Influences on Text Interpretation · IJCAI 1981 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › automated reasoning
inference control |
0.0 | 1 | 1981 | Directing And Re-Directing Inference Pursuit: Extra-Textual Influences on Text Interpretation · IJCAI 1981 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
nonmonotonic reasoning |
0.0 | 1 | 1980 | When Expectation Fails: Towards a Self-Correcting Inference System · AAAI 1980 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
lexical semantics |
0.0 | 1 | 1977 | FOUL-UP: A Program that Figures Out Meanings of Words from Context · IJCAI 1977 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
word sense disambiguation |
0.0 | 1 | 1977 | FOUL-UP: A Program that Figures Out Meanings of Words from Context · IJCAI 1977 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
incremental learning · 0.0cortical network · 0.0strategy-driven inference · 0.0cognitive modeling · 0.0expectation-based reasoning · 0.0belief revision · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Time-First Tracking: An Efficient Multiple-Object Tracking Architecture for Dynamic Surveillance Environments
Joachim Lohn-Jaramillo, Khari Jarrett, Laura E. Ray, Richard Granger, Elijah F. W. Bowen |
ICPRAM | 4 |
| 2019 | Feedforward and Feedback Processing of Spatiotemporal Tubes for Efficient Object LocalizationabstractWe introduce a new set of mechanisms for tracking entities through videos, at substantially less expense than required by standard methods. The approach combines inexpensive initial processing of individual frames together with integration of information across long time spans (multiple frames), resulting in the recognition and tracking of spatially and temporally contiguous entities, rather than focusing on the individual pixels that comprise those entities. Khari Jarrett, Joachim Lohn-Jaramillo, Elijah F. W. Bowen, Laura E. Ray, Richard Granger |
ICPRAM | 5 |
| 2016 | The grammar of mammalian brain capacity
Antonio Rodriguez, Richard Granger |
Theor. Comput. Sci. | 2 |
| 2014 | Learning what is where from unlabeled images: joint localization and clustering of foreground objects
Ashok Chandrashekar, Lorenzo Torresani, Richard Granger |
Mach. Learn. | 3 |
| 2006 | Keynote talk
Richard Granger |
WWW | 1 |
| 2001 | Continuous two-dimensional current source density analyses of electrophysiological activity in hippocampal slices
Ken Shimono, Makoto Taketani, Fernando Brücher, Don Kubota, Laura Colgin, Sam Robertson, Richard Granger, Gary Lynch |
Neurocomputing | 7 |
| 1996 | An algorithm derived from thalamocortical circuitry stores and retrieves temporal sequencesabstractDifferent sensory neocortical architectures share prominent architectural and operational features, including convergent feedfoward and feedback connections with both specific and nonspecific thalamic nuclei, and synaptic long-term potentiation (LTP), a suspected substrate of learning. We present a subcircuit that is composed of a broad set of these shared constituents, and that is thus common to multiple neocortical regions. The subcircuit is shown to possess the capability for high-capacity storage and recognition of arbitrary-length temporal feature sequences. Operation of the circuit is illustrated here via its application to handwritten text recognition. The model constitutes a novel hypothesis of underlying functions of sensory neocortical circuitry which, it is argued, are similar across modalities. It is worth noting that the model also suggests a novel approach to handwriting recognition, requiring no preprocessing, no size normalization, and no segmentation, as well as having low space and time complexity costs. Boris Aleksandrovsky, James Whitson, Andreas Garzotto, Gary Lynch, Richard Granger |
ICPR | 5 |
| 1996 | Novel speech processing mechanism derived from auditory neocortical circuit analysisabstractAnalysis of the prominent anatomical and physiological features of auditory thalamus and neocortex has enabled construction of models designed to identify functionality emergent from these biological circuits.These models have recently been shown to provide powerful computational mechanisms for processing of continuous time-varying sequences such as speech; testing on speech databases has yielded positive initial results that are reported here.The model constitutes a novel hypothesis of underlying functions of auditory neocortex, and also represents a novel approach to speech processing. Generalized cortical memory modelResearch in our laboratory has been concentrating on the phenomenon of long-term potentiation (LTP) [3], which is the most likely candidate for a substrate of neocortical learning and memory.A set of simple learning rules was formulated based on physiological properties of LTP -i) synaptic weight can only increase, ii) every increase is small fixed change, and iii) low saturation threshold permits only 5-10 weight increases over the whole period of training [2] [10] .A series of models were constructed based on the known anatomical cortical features -sparse-random connectivity in the superficial cortical layers, emergence of the cortical patches defined by the radius of the local inhibition, and feedback inhibition and masking.The above variety of neocortical features specify a biologically constrained class of microcircuits, which typically perform pattern recognition or classification via competitive learning and lateral inhibition [6] [5] .Simulations of those circuits lead to efficient hardware implementations, with a proven utility for pattern recognition via efficient approximation of statistical pattern recognition methods (e.g.Bayes classifiers) [5].Key anatomical properties of the auditory model being reviewed in [16] (see also Table 1) include i) topographic (MGv) versus broadly-tuned (MGm) thalamic nuclei, convergently projecting to primary auditory cortex; local cortical circuits composed of Boris Aleksandrovsky, James Whitson, Gretchen Andes, Gary Lynch, Richard Granger |
ICSLP | 5 |
| 1994 | Sparse random networks with LTP learning rules approximate Bayes classifiers via Parzen's method
Robert L. Coultrip, Richard Granger |
Neural Networks | 2 |
| 1992 | A cortical model of winner-take-all competition via lateral inhibition
Robert L. Coultrip, Richard Granger, Gary Lynch |
Neural Networks | 2 |
| 1988 | Formal analysis of aggregate function of layer II cerebral cortex
Richard Granger, Jose A. Ambros-Ingerson, Gary Lynch |
Neural Networks | 1 |
| 1987 | Partitioning of Sensory Data by a Cortical Network
Richard Granger, Jose A. Ambros-Ingerson, Howard Henry, Gary Lynch |
NIPS | 1 |
| 1986 | Beyond Incremental Processing: Tracking Concept Drift
Jeffrey C. Schlimmer, Richard Granger |
AAAI | 2 |
| 1986 | Incremental Learning from Noisy Data
Jeffrey C. Schlimmer, Richard Granger |
Mach. Learn. | 2 |
| 1983 | STRATEGIST: A Program That Models Strategy-Driven and Content-Driven Inference Behavior
Richard Granger, Kurt P. Eiselt, Jennifer K. Holbrook |
AAAI | 1 |
| 1983 | The NOMAD System: Expectation-Based Detection and Correction of Errors During Understanding of Syntactically and Semantically III-Formed Text
Richard Granger |
Am. J. Comput. Linguistics | 1 |
| 1982 | Scruffy Text Understanding: Design and Implementation of 'Tolerant' UnderstandersabstractMost large text-understanding systems have been designed under the assumption that the input text will be in reasonably "neat" form, e.g., newspaper stories and other edited texts. However, a great deal of natural language text, e.g., memos, rough drafts, conversation transcripts, etc., have features that differ significantly from "neat" texts, posing special problems for readers, such as misspelled words, missing words, poor syntactic construction, missing periods, etc. Our solution to these problems is to make use of expectations, based both on knowledge of surface English and on world knowledge of the situation being described. These syntactic and semantic expectations can be used to figure out unknown words from context, constrain the possible word-senses of words with multiple meanings (ambiguity), fill in missing words (ellipsis), and resolve referents (anaphora). This method of using expectations to aid the understanding of "scruffy" texts has been incorporated into a working computer program called NOMAD, which understands scruffy texts in the domain of Navy messages. Richard Granger |
ACL | 1 |
| 1981 | Directing And Re-Directing Inference Pursuit: Extra-Textual Influences on Text Interpretation
Richard Granger |
IJCAI | 1 |
| 1980 | When Expectation Fails: Towards a Self-Correcting Inference System
Richard Granger |
AAAI | 1 |
| 1977 | FOUL-UP: A Program that Figures Out Meanings of Words from Context
Richard Granger |
IJCAI | 1 |