Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Harald Hempel

dblp:h/HaraldHempel · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
22ranked-venue papers
5as first author
0since 2021 · last 2012
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 22 · 5 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
5 papers
Computational complexity · 89% Approximation and online algorithms · 11%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computational complexity › complexity classes
polynomial hierarchy
0.132005
Extending Downward Collapse from 1-versus-2 Queries to m-versus-m + 1 Queries · SIAM J. Comput. 2005
Query Order · SIAM J. Comput. 1998
A Downward Collapse within the Polynomial Hierarchy · SIAM J. Comput. 1998
Approximation and online algorithms › online algorithms › online algorithms with side information
advice complexity
0.012004
Algebraic Properties for Selector Functions · SIAM J. Comput. 2004
Computational complexity › structural complexity
p-selective sets
0.012004
Algebraic Properties for Selector Functions · SIAM J. Comput. 2004
Computational complexity
reduction
0.012002
Optimal Series-Parallel Trade-offs for Reducing a Function to Its Own Graph · Inf. Comput. 2002
Computational complexity › structural complexity › complexity hierarchies
boolean hierarchy
0.011998
Query Order · SIAM J. Comput. 1998
Computational complexity
structural complexity
0.011998
Query Order · SIAM J. Comput. 1998

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

relativizable proof technique · 0.1karp-lipton advice · 0.0associativity · 0.0truth-table reduction · 0.0polynomial-time turing reduction · 0.0downward collapse proof · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2012 Inverse Hamiltonian Cycle and inverse 3Dimensional Matching are coNP-complete
Harald Hempel, Michael Krüger
Theor. Comput. Sci.1
2009 Reoptimization of Traveling Salesperson Problems: Changing Single Edge-Weights
Tobias Berg, Harald Hempel
LATA2
2008 Approximating Alternative Solutions
Michael Krüger, Harald Hempel
COCOON2
2008 Persistent Computations of Turing Machines
Harald Hempel, Madlen Kimmritz
CIAA1
2006 Inverse HAMILTONIAN CYCLE and Inverse 3-D MATCHING Are coNP-Complete
Michael Krüger, Harald Hempel
ISAAC2
2005 Extending Downward Collapse from 1-versus-2 Queries to m-versus-m + 1 Queries
abstract
The top part of Figure 1.1 shows some classes from the (truth-table) bounded-query and boolean hierarchies. It is well known that if either of these hierarchies collapses at a given level, then all higher levels of that hierarchy collapse to that same level. This is a standard "upward translation of equality" that has been known for over a decade. The issue of whether these hierarchies can translate equality downwards has proven vastly more challenging. In particular, with regard to Figure 1.1, consider the following claim: \[ \psigkmtt = \psigkmponett \implies \diffmsigk = \codiffmsigk = \bh(\sigmak). (*) \] Until recently, it was not known whether (*) ever held, except for the degenerate cases m = 0 and k = 0. Then Hemaspaandra, Hemaspaandra, and Hempel [SIAM J. Comput., 28 (1999), pp. 383--393] proved that (*) holds for all m, for k > 2. Buhrman and Fortnow [J. Comput. System Sci., 59 (1999), pp. 182--199] then showed that, when k = 2, (*) holds for the case m = 1. In this paper, we prove that for the case k = 2, (*) holds for all values of m. Since there is an oracle relative to which "for k = 1, (*) holds for all m" fails (see Buhrman and Fortnow), our achievement of the k = 2 case cannot be strengthened to k = 1 by any relativizable proof technique. The new downward translation we obtain also tightens the collapse in the polynomial hierarchy implied by a collapse in the bounded-query hierarchy of the second level of the polynomial hierarchy.
Edith Hemaspaandra, Lane A. Hemaspaandra, Harald Hempel
SIAM J. Comput.3
2005 All superlinear inverse schemes are coNP-hard
Edith Hemaspaandra, Lane A. Hemaspaandra, Harald Hempel
Theor. Comput. Sci.3
2004 All Superlinear Inverse Schemes Are coNP-Hard
Edith Hemaspaandra, Lane A. Hemaspaandra, Harald Hempel
MFCS3
2004 Algebraic Properties for Selector Functions
abstract
The nondeterministic advice complexity of the P-selective sets is known to be exactly linear. Regarding the deterministic advice complexity of the P-selective sets---i.e., the amount of Karp--Lipton advice needed for polynomial-time machines to recognize them in general---the best current upper bound is quadratic [K. Ko, J. Comput. System Sci., 26 (1983), pp. 209--221] and the best current lower bound is linear [L. Hemaspaandra and L. Torenvliet, Theoret. Comput. Sci., 154 (1996), pp. 367--377]. We prove that every associatively P-selective set is commutatively, associatively P-selective. Using this, we establish an algebraic sufficient condition for the P-selective sets to have a linear upper bound (which thus would match the existing lower bound) on their deterministic advice complexity: If all P-selective sets are associatively P-selective, then the deterministic advice complexity of the P-selective sets is linear. The weakest previously known sufficient condition was P = NP. We also establish related results for algebraic properties of, and advice complexity of, the nondeterministically selective sets.
Lane A. Hemaspaandra, Harald Hempel, Arfst Nickelsen
SIAM J. Comput.2
2003 P-immune sets with holes lack self-reducibility properties
Lane A. Hemaspaandra, Harald Hempel
Theor. Comput. Sci.2
2002 On claw-free asteroidal triple-free graphs
Harald Hempel, Dieter Kratsch
Discret. Appl. Math.1
2002 Optimal Series-Parallel Trade-offs for Reducing a Function to Its Own Graph
Richard Beigel, Lane A. Hemaspaandra, Harald Hempel, Jörg Vogel 0001
Inf. Comput.3
2001 Algebraic Properties for P-Selectivity
Lane A. Hemaspaandra, Harald Hempel, Arfst Nickelsen
COCOON2
1999 Extending Downward Collapse from 1-versus-2 Queries to j-versus-j+1 Queries
Edith Hemaspaandra, Lane A. Hemaspaandra, Harald Hempel
STACS3
1999 On Claw-Free Asteroidal Triple-Free Graphs
Harald Hempel, Dieter Kratsch
WG1
1998 RS N1-tt (NP) Distinguishes Robust Many-One and Turing Completeness
Edith Hemaspaandra, Lane A. Hemaspaandra, Harald Hempel
Theory Comput. Syst.3
1998 A Downward Collapse within the Polynomial Hierarchy
abstract
Downward collapse (also known as upward separation) refers to cases where the equality of two larger classes implies the equality of two smaller classes. We provide an unqualified downward collapse result completely within the polynomial hierarchy. In particular, we prove that, for k > 2, if ${\rm P}^{\Sigma^p_k[1]} = {\rm P}^{\Sigma^p_k[2]}$ then $\Sigma^p_k = \Pi^p_k = {\rm PH}$. We extend this to obtain a more general downward collapse result.
Edith Hemaspaandra, Lane A. Hemaspaandra, Harald Hempel
SIAM J. Comput.3
1998 Query Order
abstract
We study the effect of queryorder on computational power and show that ${\rm P}^{{\rm BH}_j[1]:{\rm BH}_k[1]}$\allowbreak---the languages computable via a polynomial-time machine given one query to the jth level of the boolean hierarchy followed by one query to the kth level of the boolean hierarchy---equals ${\rm R}_{{j+2k-1}{\scriptsize\mbox{-tt}}}^{p}({\rm NP})$ if j is even and k is odd and equals ${\rm R}_{{j+2k}{\scriptsize\mbox{-tt}}}^{p}({\rm NP})$ otherwise. Thus unless the polynomial hierarchy collapses it holds that, for each $1\leq j \leq k$, ${\rm P}^{{\rm BH}_j[1]:{\rm BH}_k[1]} = {\rm P}^{{\rm BH}_k[1]:{\rm BH}_j [1]} \iff (j=k) \lor (j\mbox{ is even}\, \land k=j+1)$. We extend our analysis to apply to more general query classes.
Lane A. Hemaspaandra, Harald Hempel, Gerd Wechsung
SIAM J. Comput.2
1997 RSN1-tt(NP) Distinguishes Robust Many-One and Turing Completeness
Edith Hemaspaandra, Lane A. Hemaspaandra, Harald Hempel
CIAC3
1997 Query Order in the Polynomial Hierarchy
Edith Hemaspaandra, Lane A. Hemaspaandra, Harald Hempel
FCT3
1997 A Downward Translation in the Polynomial Hierarchy
Edith Hemaspaandra, Lane A. Hemaspaandra, Harald Hempel
STACS3
1997 The Operators min and max on the Polynomial Hierarchy
Harald Hempel, Gerd Wechsung
STACS1