Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Tom Head

dblp:h/TomHead · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
26ranked-venue papers
21as first author
0since 2021 · last 2011
0000-0002-7558-6953ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 21 · 17 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 3 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
4 papers
Coding theory · 82% Algorithms and data structures · 18%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Coding theory
source coding
0.011996
The finest homophonic partition and related code concepts · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 1996
Coding theory › error-correcting codes › uniquely decodable codes
multiset decipherable codes
0.011995
Deciding multiset decipherability · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 1995
Algorithms and data structures › sequence algorithms
string algorithms
0.011995
Deciding multiset decipherability · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 1995
Coding theory › error-correcting codes
uniquely decodable codes
0.011995
Deciding multiset decipherability · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 1995

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

domino-based algorithm · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2011 Computing transparently: the independent sets in a graph
Tom Head
Nat. Comput.1
2010 Using Light to Implement Parallel Boolean Algebra
Tom Head
Developments in Language Theory1
2005 Does Light Direct Life Toward Cosmic Awareness?
Tom Head
Fundam. Informaticae1
2005 Protein output for DNA computing
Christiaan V. Henkel, Reno S. Bladergroen, Crina I. A. Balog, André M. Deelder, Tom Head, Grzegorz Rozenberg, Herman P. Spaink
Nat. Comput.5
2002 Aqueous Computing: A Survey with an Invitation to Participate
Tom Head, Masayuki Yamamura, Susannah Gal
J. Comput. Sci. Technol.1
1999 Aqueous computing: writing on molecules
abstract
Molecular computing is viewed here as a process of writing on molecules while they are dissolved in water. When DNA molecules are employed, they are used only in double stranded form and only as data registers. All computations are initialized with the same single molecular variety. Current progress toward laboratory prototyping of computations is reported.
Tom Head, Masayuki Yamamura, Susannah Gal
CEC1
1998 Locality, Reversibility, and Beyond: Learning Languages from Positive Data
Tom Head, Satoshi Kobayashi, Takashi Yokomori
ALT1
1998 Splicing Representations of Strictly Locally Testable Languages
Tom Head
Discret. Appl. Math.1
1996 The finest homophonic partition and related code concepts
abstract
Let C be a finite set of n words having total length L where all words are taken over a R-element alphabet. The set C is called numerically decipherable if any two factorizations of the same word over the given alphabet into words in C have the same length. An O(nL/sup 2/) time and O((n+k)L) space algorithm is presented for computing the finest homophonic partition of C provided that this set is numerically decipherable. The latter property can be decided by another algorithm requiring O(nL) time and O((n+k)L) space. The two algorithms are based on a technique related to dominoes.
Tom Head
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory2
1995 Deciding multiset decipherability
abstract
An O(n/sup 2/L) time and O((n+k)L) space algorithm is provided for deciding whether or not a finite set C consisting of n words having total length L, where all words are taken over a k-element alphabet, is a multiset decipherable code. The algorithm is based on a technique related to dominoes. At an easily stage it decides in O(nL) time and O((n+k)L) space whether or not the set C is uniquely decipherable.>
Tom Head
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory1
1994 The Finest Homophonic Partition and Related Code Concepts
Tom Head
MFCS2
1990 The Set of Strings Mapped Into a Submonoid by Iterates of a Morphism
Tom Head
Theor. Comput. Sci.1
1989 Deciding the Immutability of Regular Codes and Languages Under Finite Transductions
Tom Head
Inf. Process. Lett.1
1987 Bounded D0L Languages
Tom Head, Barbara Lando
Theor. Comput. Sci.1
1986 Periodic D0L Languages
Tom Head, Barbara Lando
Theor. Comput. Sci.1
1986 Regularity of Sets of Initial Strings of Periodic D0L-Systems
Tom Head, Barbara Lando
Theor. Comput. Sci.1
1985 Code Properties and Homomorphisms of D0L Systems
Tom Head, John Wilkinson
Theor. Comput. Sci.1
1984 Adherence Equivalence Is Decidable for DOL Languages
Tom Head
STACS1
1984 Adherences of D0L Languages
Tom Head
Theor. Comput. Sci.1
1983 DOL Schemes and the Periodicity of String Embeddings
Tom Head, Gabriel Thierrin, John Wilkinson
Theor. Comput. Sci.1
1982 Finite DOL Languages and Codes
Tom Head, John Wilkinson
Theor. Comput. Sci.1
1980 Hypercodes in Deterministic and Slender 0L Languages
Tom Head, Gabriel Thierrin
Inf. Control.1
1980 A-Transducers and the Monotonicity of IL Schemes
Tom Head
J. Comput. Syst. Sci.1
1979 The Decidability of Equivalence for Deterministic Finite Transducers
Meera Blattner, Tom Head
J. Comput. Syst. Sci.2
1979 Codeterministic Lindenmayer Schemes and Systems
Tom Head
J. Comput. Syst. Sci.1
1977 Automata That Recognize Intersections of Free Submonoids
Meera Blattner, Tom Head
Inf. Control.2