Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Shahab Kamali

dblp:k/ShahabKamali · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 5 · 3 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Data mining · 53% Information retrieval · 47%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Image recognition and object detection · 39% Information extraction and text analysis · 30% Vision and language · 30%

Topics — the 10 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
data annotation
0.412020
The Open Images Dataset V4 · Int. J. Comput. Vis. 2020
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
object detection
0.412020
The Open Images Dataset V4 · Int. J. Comput. Vis. 2020
Computer vision › Vision and language
visual relationship detection
0.412020
The Open Images Dataset V4 · Int. J. Comput. Vis. 2020
Data mining
clustering
0.412019
Randomized Experimental Design via Geographic Clustering · KDD 2019
Information retrieval › retrieval evaluation
experimental design
0.412019
Randomized Experimental Design via Geographic Clustering · KDD 2019
Data mining › clustering
graph clustering
0.412019
Randomized Experimental Design via Geographic Clustering · KDD 2019
Information retrieval › document retrieval › domain-specific retrieval › mathematical information retrieval › math-aware search
mathematical formula retrieval
0.212013
Retrieving documents with mathematical content · SIGIR 2013
Information retrieval › document retrieval › domain-specific retrieval
mathematical information retrieval
0.212013
Retrieving documents with mathematical content · SIGIR 2013
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
image classification
0.112020
The Open Images Dataset V4 · Int. J. Comput. Vis. 2020
Data mining › text mining
text classification
0.012013
Retrieving documents with mathematical content · SIGIR 2013

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

model scaling study · 0.4annotation validation · 0.4statistical framework · 0.4randomized experimental design · 0.4keyword search · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 The Open Images Dataset V4
abstract
We present Open Images V4, a dataset of 9.2M images with unified annotations for image classification, object detection and visual relationship detection. The images have a Creative Commons Attribution license that allows to share and adapt the material, and they have been collected from Flickr without a predefined list of class names or tags, leading to natural class statistics and avoiding an initial design bias. Open Images V4 offers large scale across several dimensions: 30.1M image-level labels for 19.8k concepts, 15.4M bounding boxes for 600 object classes, and 375k visual relationship annotations involving 57 classes. For object detection in particular, we provide 15x more bounding boxes than the next largest datasets (15.4M boxes on 1.9M images). The images often show complex scenes with several objects (8 annotated objects per image on average). We annotated visual relationships between them, which support visual relationship detection, an emerging task that requires structured reasoning. We provide in-depth comprehensive statistics about the dataset, we validate the quality of the annotations, we study how the performance of several modern models evolves with increasing amounts of training data, and we demonstrate two applications made possible by having unified annotations of multiple types coexisting in the same images. We hope that the scale, quality, and variety of Open Images V4 will foster further research and innovation even beyond the areas of image classification, object detection, and visual relationship detection.
Alina Kuznetsova, Hassan Rom, Neil Alldrin, Jasper R. R. Uijlings, Ivan Krasin, Jordi Pont-Tuset, Shahab Kamali, Stefan Popov, Matteo Malloci, Alexander Kolesnikov 0003, Tom Duerig, Vittorio Ferrari
Int. J. Comput. Vis.7
2019 Randomized Experimental Design via Geographic Clustering
abstract
Web-based services often run randomized experiments to improve their products. A popular way to run these experiments is to use geographical regions as units of experimentation, since this does not require tracking of individual users or browser cookies. Since users may issue queries from multiple geographical locations, geo-regions cannot be considered independent and interference may be present in the experiment. In this paper, we study this problem, and first present GeoCUTS, a novel algorithm that forms geographical clusters to minimize interference while preserving balance in cluster size. We use a random sample of anonymized traffic from Google Search to form a graph representing user movements, then construct a geographically coherent clustering of the graph. Our main technical contribution is a statistical framework to measure the effectiveness of clusterings. Furthermore, we perform empirical evaluations showing that the performance of GeoCUTS is comparable to hand-crafted geo-regions with respect to both novel and existing metrics.
David Rolnick, Kevin Aydin, Jean Pouget-Abadie, Shahab Kamali, Vahab S. Mirrokni, Amir Najmi
KDD4
2013 Retrieving documents with mathematical content
abstract
Many documents with mathematical content are published on the Web, but conventional search engines that rely on keyword search only cannot fully exploit their mathematical information. In particular, keyword search is insufficient when expressions in a document are not annotated with natural keywords or the user cannot describe her query with keywords. Retrieving documents by querying their mathematical content directly is very appealing in various domains such as education, digital libraries, engineering, patent documents, medical sciences, etc. Capturing the relevance of mathematical expressions also greatly enhances document classification in such domains.
Shahab Kamali, Frank Wm. Tompa
SIGIR1
2011 Grammar Inference for Web Documents
Shahab Kamali, Frank Wm. Tompa
WebDB1
2010 A new mathematics retrieval system
abstract
The Web contains a large collection of documents, some with mathematical expressions. Because mathematical expressions are objects with complex structures and rather few distinct symbols, conventional text retrieval systems are not very successful in mathematics retrieval. The lack of a definition for similarity between mathematical expressions, and the inadequacy of searching for exact matches only, makes the problem of mathematics retrieval even harder. As a result, the few existing mathematics retrieval systems are not very helpful in addressing users' needs.
Shahab Kamali, Frank Wm. Tompa
CIKM1
2005 A Hybrid Approach for Refreshing Web Page Repositories
Mohammad Ghodsi, Oktie Hassanzadeh, Shahab Kamali, Morteza Monemizadeh
DASFAA3