Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Ross Lippert

dblp:l/RossLippert · also Ross A. Lippert · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
8ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2007
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 4 · 2 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-authorTheory of computation · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Reinforcement learning · 30% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 23% Learning theory · 23%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 100%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › regularization for reinforcement learning
value regularization
0.112007
Value Regularization and Fenchel Duality · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2007
Mathematical optimization
regularization
0.112006
Infinite-sigma Limits For Tikhonov Regularization · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2006
Mathematical optimization › regularization › convex regularization
tikhonov regularization
0.112006
Infinite-sigma Limits For Tikhonov Regularization · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2006
Machine learning › Learning theory › statistical learning theory
asymptotic analysis
0.112005
Asymptotics of Gaussian Regularized Least Squares · NIPS 2005
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
kernel methods
0.112005
Asymptotics of Gaussian Regularized Least Squares · NIPS 2005
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › regression › least squares regression
regularized least squares regression
0.112005
Asymptotics of Gaussian Regularized Least Squares · NIPS 2005
Bioinformatics and computational biology › comparative genomics › genome comparison
genomic sequence comparison
0.012004
Finding anchors for genomic sequence comparison · RECOMB 2004
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence alignment › genome alignment
whole-genome alignment
0.012004
Finding anchors for genomic sequence comparison · RECOMB 2004

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

statistical framework · 0.0dynamic programming · 0.0chaining algorithm · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2007 Value Regularization and Fenchel Duality
Ryan M. Rifkin, Ross Lippert
J. Mach. Learn. Res.2
2006 Infinite-sigma Limits For Tikhonov Regularization
Ross Lippert, Ryan M. Rifkin
J. Mach. Learn. Res.1
2005 Asymptotics of Gaussian Regularized Least Squares
abstract
We consider regularized least-squares (RLS) with a Gaussian kernel. We prove that if we let the Gaussian bandwidth σ → ∞ while letting the regularization parameter λ → 0, the RLS solution tends to a polynomial whose order is controlled by the rielative rates of decay of 1 σ2 and λ: if λ = σ−(2k+1), then, as σ → ∞, the RLS solution tends to the kth order polynomial with minimal empirical error. We illustrate the result with an example.
Ross Lippert, Ryan M. Rifkin
NIPS1
2004 Finding anchors for genomic sequence comparison
abstract
Recent sequencing of the human and other mammalian genomes has brought about the necessity to align them, to identify and characterize their commonalities and differences. Programs that align whole genomes generally use a seed-and-extend technique, starting from exact or near-exact matches and selecting a reliable subset of these, called anchors, and then filling in the remaining portions between the anchors using a combination of local and global alignment algorithms, but their choices for the parameters so far have been primarily heuristic. We present a statistical framework and practical methods for selecting a set of matches that is both sensitive and specific and can constitute a reliable set of anchors for a one-to-one mapping of two genomes from which a whole-genome alignment can be built. Starting from exact matches, we introduce a novel per-base repeat annotation, the $Z$-score, from which noise and repeat filtering conditions are explored. Dynamic programming-based chaining algorithms are also evaluated as context-based filters. We apply the methods described here to the comparison of two progressive assemblies of the human genome, NCBI build 28 and build 34 http://genome.ucsc.edu), and show that a significant portion of the two genomes can be found in selected exact matches, with very limited amount of sequence duplication.
Ross Lippert, Xiaoyue Zhao, Liliana Florea, Clark M. Mobarry, Sorin Istrail
RECOMB1
2004 Sequence Database Compression for Peptide Identification from Tandem Mass Spectra
Nathan Edwards, Ross Lippert
WABI2
2002 Generating Peptide Candidates from Amino-Acid Sequence Databases for Protein Identification via Mass Spectrometry
Nathan Edwards, Ross Lippert
WABI2
2002 Algorithmic strategies for the single nucleotide polymorphism haplotype assembly problem
abstract
With the consensus human genome sequenced and many other sequencing projects at varying stages of completion, greater attention is being paid to the genetic differences among individuals and the abilities of those differences to predict phenotypes. A significant obstacle to such work is the difficulty and expense of determining haplotypes--sets of variants genetically linked because of their proximity on the genome--for large numbers of individuals for use in association studies. This paper presents some algorithmic considerations in a new approach for haplotype determination: inferring haplotypes from localised polymorphism data gathered from short genome 'fragments.' Formalised models of the biological system under consideration are examined, given a variety of assumptions about the goal of the problem and the character of optimal solutions. Some theoretical results and algorithms for handling haplotype assembly given the different models are then sketched. The primary conclusion is that some important simplified variants of the problem yield tractable problems while more general variants tend to be intractable in the worst case.
Ross Lippert, Russell Schwartz, Giuseppe Lancia, Sorin Istrail
Briefings Bioinform.1
2001 SNPs Problems, Complexity, and Algorithms
Giuseppe Lancia, Vineet Bafna, Sorin Istrail, Ross Lippert, Russell Schwartz
ESA4