Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Mark A. Paskin

dblp:p/MarkAPaskin · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
9ranked-venue papers
5as first author
0since 2021 · last 2006
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 4 first-authorComputer networks · 3 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
5 papers
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 66% Robot navigation and mapping · 25% Graph learning · 5%
Computer networks
4 papers
Internet of things and sensor networks · 41% Wireless sensing and localization · 32% Edge and fog computing · 28%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
3 papers
Distributed systems · 100%

Topics — the 17 heaviest of 20, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Distributed systems › distributed machine learning
distributed inference
0.112006
Distributed Inference in Dynamical Systems · NIPS 2006
Edge and fog computing › edge inference
collaborative inference
0.112005
A robust architecture for distributed inference in sensor networks · IPSN 2005
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference
approximate inference
0.012003
Sample Propagation · NIPS 2003
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
SLAM
0.012003
Thin Junction Tree Filters for Simultaneous Localization and Mapping · IJCAI 2003
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
graphical models
0.012001
Linear-time inference in Hierarchical HMMs · NIPS 2001
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › latent variable model › hidden markov model
hierarchical hidden markov model
0.012001
Linear-time inference in Hierarchical HMMs · NIPS 2001
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
statistical inference
0.012001
Linear-time inference in Hierarchical HMMs · NIPS 2001
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › state estimation › multiagent state estimation
multi-robot state estimation
0.012006
Distributed Inference in Dynamical Systems · NIPS 2006
Internet of things and sensor networks › wireless sensor network
sensor deployment
0.012006
Distributed Inference in Dynamical Systems · NIPS 2006
Distributed systems
distributed algorithms
0.012006
Distributed localization of networked cameras · IPSN 2006
Distributed systems
fault tolerance
0.012005
A robust architecture for distributed inference in sensor networks · IPSN 2005
Distributed systems › fault tolerance
robust distributed algorithms
0.012005
A robust architecture for distributed inference in sensor networks · IPSN 2005
Internet of things and sensor networks › sensor data management
sensor data collection
0.012004
Distributed regression: an efficient framework for modeling sensor network data · IPSN 2004
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference
junction tree inference
0.012003
Sample Propagation · NIPS 2003
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network
message passing
0.012003
Sample Propagation · NIPS 2003
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › parameter estimation
expectation-maximization
0.012001
Grammatical Bigrams · NIPS 2001
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
sequence modeling
0.012001
Linear-time inference in Hierarchical HMMs · NIPS 2001

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

belief state coordination · 0.2assumed density filtering · 0.2message passing · 0.1projective geometry · 0.1probabilistic reasoning · 0.1distributed message passing · 0.1junction tree optimization · 0.1approximate inference · 0.1kernel linear regression · 0.0distributed optimization · 0.0sampling · 0.0rao-blackwellization · 0.0junction tree filtering · 0.0expectation-maximization · 0.0dynamic bayesian network · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2006 Distributed localization of networked cameras
abstract
Camera networks are perhaps the most common type of sensor network and are deployed in a variety of real-world applications including surveillance, intelligent environments and scientific remote monitoring. A key problem in deploying a network of cameras is calibration, i.e., determining the location and orientation of each sensor so that observations in an image can be mapped to locations in the real world. This paper proposes a fully distributed approach for camera network calibration. The cameras collaborate to track an object that moves through the environment and reason probabilistically about which camera poses are consistent with the observed images. This reasoning employs sophisticated techniques for handling the difficult nonlinearities imposed by projective transformations, as well as the dense correlations that arise between distant cameras. Our method requires minimal overlap of the cameras' fields of view and makes very few assumptions about the motion of the object. In contrast to existing approaches, which are centralized, our distributed algorithm scales easily to very large camera networks. We evaluate the system on a real camera network with 25 nodes as well as simulated camera networks of up to 50 cameras and demonstrate that our approach performs well even when communication is lossy.
Stanislav Funiak, Carlos Guestrin, Mark A. Paskin, Rahul Sukthankar
IPSN3
2006 Distributed Inference in Dynamical Systems
abstract
We present a robust distributed algorithm for approximate probabilistic inference in dynamical systems, such as sensor networks and teams of mobile robots. Using assumed density filtering, the network nodes maintain a tractable representation of the belief state in a distributed fashion. At each time step, the nodes coordinate to condition this distribution on the observations made throughout the network, and to advance this estimate to the next time step. In addition, we identify a significant challenge for probabilistic inference in dynamical systems: message losses or network partitions can cause nodes to have inconsistent beliefs about the current state of the system. We address this problem by developing distributed algorithms that guarantee that nodes will reach an informative consistent distribution when communication is re-established. We present a suite of experimental results on real-world sensor data for two real sensor network deployments: one with 25 cameras and another with 54 temperature sensors.
Stanislav Funiak, Carlos Guestrin, Mark A. Paskin, Rahul Sukthankar
NIPS3
2005 A robust architecture for distributed inference in sensor networks
abstract
Many inference problems that arise in sensor networks require the computation of a global conclusion that is consistent with local information known to each node. A large class of these problems-including probabilistic inference, regression, and control problems-can be solved by message passing on a data structure called a junction tree. In this paper, we present a distributed architecture for solving these problems that is robust to unreliable communication and node failures. In this architecture, the nodes of the sensor network assemble themselves into a junction tree and exchange messages between neighbors to solve the inference problem efficiently and exactly. A key part of the architecture is an efficient distributed algorithm for optimizing the choice of junction tree to minimize the communication and computation required by inference. We present experimental results from a prototype implementation on a 97-node Mica2 mote network, as well as simulation results for three applications: distributed sensor calibration, optimal control, and sensor field modeling. These experiments demonstrate that our distributed architecture can solve many important inference problems exactly, efficiently, and robustly.
Mark A. Paskin, Carlos Guestrin, Jim McFadden
IPSN1
2004 Distributed regression: an efficient framework for modeling sensor network data
abstract
We present distributed regression, an efficient and general framework for in-network modeling of sensor data. In this framework, the nodes of the sensor network collaborate to optimally fit a global function to each of their local measurements. The algorithm is based upon kernel linear regression, where the model takes the form of a weighted sum of local basis functions; this provides an expressive yet tractable class of models for sensor network data. Rather than transmitting data to one another or outside the network, nodes communicate constraints on the model parameters, drastically reducing the communication required. After the algorithm is run, each node can answer queries for its local region, or the nodes can efficiently transmit the parameters of the model to a user outside the network. We present an evaluation of the algorithm based upon data from a 48-node sensor network deployment at the Intel Research - Berkeley Lab, demonstrating that our distributed algorithm converges to the optimal solution at a fast rate and is very robust to packet losses.
Carlos Guestrin, Peter Bodík, Romain Thibaux, Mark A. Paskin, Samuel Madden 0001
IPSN4
2004 Robust Probabilistic Inference in Distributed Systems
Mark A. Paskin, Carlos Guestrin
UAI1
2003 Thin Junction Tree Filters for Simultaneous Localization and Mapping
Mark A. Paskin
IJCAI1
2003 Sample Propagation
abstract
Rao–Blackwellization is an approximation technique for probabilistic in- ference that flexibly combines exact inference with sampling. It is useful in models where conditioning on some of the variables leaves a sim- pler inference problem that can be solved tractably. This paper presents Sample Propagation, an efficient implementation of Rao–Blackwellized approximate inference for a large class of models. Sample Propagation tightly integrates sampling with message passing in a junction tree, and is named for its simple, appealing structure: it walks the clusters of a junction tree, sampling some of the current cluster’s variables and then passing a message to one of its neighbors. We discuss the application of Sample Propagation to conditional Gaussian inference problems such as switching linear dynamical systems.
Mark A. Paskin
NIPS1
2001 Linear-time inference in Hierarchical HMMs
abstract
The hierarchical hidden Markov model (HHMM) is a generalization of the hidden Markov model (HMM) that models sequences with structure at many length/time scales [FST98]. Unfortunately, the original infer- is ence algorithm is rather complicated, and takes the length of the sequence, making it impractical for many domains. In this paper, we show how HHMMs are a special kind of dynamic Bayesian network (DBN), and thereby derive a much simpler inference algorithm, which only takes time. Furthermore, by drawing the connection between HHMMs and DBNs, we enable the application of many stan- dard approximation techniques to further speed up inference.
Kevin Murphy 0002, Mark A. Paskin
NIPS2
2001 Grammatical Bigrams
abstract
Unsupervised learning algorithms have been derived for several sta(cid:173) tistical models of English grammar, but their computational com(cid:173) plexity makes applying them to large data sets intractable. This paper presents a probabilistic model of English grammar that is much simpler than conventional models, but which admits an effi(cid:173) cient EM training algorithm. The model is based upon grammat(cid:173) ical bigrams, i.e. , syntactic relationships between pairs of words. We present the results of experiments that quantify the represen(cid:173) tational adequacy of the grammatical bigram model, its ability to generalize from labelled data, and its ability to induce syntactic structure from large amounts of raw text.
Mark A. Paskin
NIPS1