Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

B. Nick Rossiter

dblp:r/BNickRossiter · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
7ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2013
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 3 · 2 first-authorSoftware engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Visualization and visual analytics · 100%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Database system architecture and tuning · 77% Information retrieval · 23%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Visualization and visual analytics
visualization theory
0.212013
Understanding Visualization: A Formal Approach Using Category Theory and Semiotics · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2013
Database system architecture and tuning › text databases
hypertext database
0.011989
Database Support for Hypertext · VLDB 1989
Information retrieval › document organization
hypertext
0.011989
Database Support for Hypertext · VLDB 1989

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

semiotics · 0.2category theory · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2013 Understanding Visualization: A Formal Approach Using Category Theory and Semiotics
abstract
This paper combines the vocabulary of semiotics and category theory to provide a formal analysis of visualization. It shows how familiar processes of visualization fit the semiotic frameworks of both Saussure and Peirce, and extends these structures using the tools of category theory to provide a general framework for understanding visualization in practice, including: Relationships between systems, data collected from those systems, renderings of those data in the form of representations, the reading of those representations to create visualizations, and the use of those visualizations to create knowledge and understanding of the system under inspection. The resulting framework is validated by demonstrating how familiar information visualization concepts (such as literalness, sensitivity, redundancy, ambiguity, generalizability, and chart junk) arise naturally from it and can be defined formally and precisely. This paper generalizes previous work on the formal characterization of visualization by, inter alia, Ziemkiewicz and Kosara and allows us to formally distinguish properties of the visualization process that previous work does not.
Paul Vickers, Joe Faith, B. Nick Rossiter
IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph.3
2011 Parsed use case descriptions as a basis for object-oriented class model generation
Mosa Elbendak, Paul Vickers, B. Nick Rossiter
J. Syst. Softw.3
2008 Relational Database Migration: A Perspective
Abdelsalam M. Maatuk, Muhammad Akhtar Ali, B. Nick Rossiter
DEXA3
1998 Constructing Standards For Cross-Platform Operation
Michael A. Heather, B. Nick Rossiter
Softw. Qual. J.2
1990 Database Models for Textual Documents: User Needs and System Capabilities
B. Nick Rossiter, Michael A. Heather
DEXA1
1990 Semantic pattern matching in netbases
Michael A. Heather, B. Nick Rossiter
Neurocomputing2
1989 Database Support for Hypertext
B. Nick Rossiter
VLDB1