Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jun Sun 0003
dblp:s/JunSun3
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2006
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Representation and self-supervised learning · 33% Learning theory · 33% Optimization for machine learning · 33% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Algorithms and data structures · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
dimensionality reduction |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | A duality view of spectral methods for dimensionality reduction · ICML 2006 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › convex optimization
duality |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | A duality view of spectral methods for dimensionality reduction · ICML 2006 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
spectral methods |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | A duality view of spectral methods for dimensionality reduction · ICML 2006 |
Algorithms and data structures
spectral methods |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | A duality view of spectral methods for dimensionality reduction · ICML 2006 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
duality theory · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 | A duality view of spectral methods for dimensionality reductionabstractWe present a unified duality view of several recently emerged spectral methods for nonlinear dimensionality reduction, including Isomap, locally linear embedding, Laplacian eigenmaps, and maximum variance unfolding. We discuss the duality theory for the maximum variance unfolding problem, and show that other methods are directly related to either its primal formulation or its dual formulation, or can be interpreted from the optimality conditions. This duality framework reveals close connections between these seemingly quite different algorithms. In particular, it resolves the myth about these methods in using either the top eigenvectors of a dense matrix, or the bottom eigenvectors of a sparse matrix --- these two eigenspaces are exactly aligned at primal-dual optimality. Lin Xiao 0003, Jun Sun 0003, Stephen P. Boyd |
ICML | 2 |