Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jun Sun 0003

dblp:s/JunSun3 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2006
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Representation and self-supervised learning · 33% Learning theory · 33% Optimization for machine learning · 33%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Algorithms and data structures · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
dimensionality reduction
0.112006
A duality view of spectral methods for dimensionality reduction · ICML 2006
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › convex optimization
duality
0.112006
A duality view of spectral methods for dimensionality reduction · ICML 2006
Machine learning › Learning theory
spectral methods
0.112006
A duality view of spectral methods for dimensionality reduction · ICML 2006
Algorithms and data structures
spectral methods
0.112006
A duality view of spectral methods for dimensionality reduction · ICML 2006

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

duality theory · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2006 A duality view of spectral methods for dimensionality reduction
abstract
We present a unified duality view of several recently emerged spectral methods for nonlinear dimensionality reduction, including Isomap, locally linear embedding, Laplacian eigenmaps, and maximum variance unfolding. We discuss the duality theory for the maximum variance unfolding problem, and show that other methods are directly related to either its primal formulation or its dual formulation, or can be interpreted from the optimality conditions. This duality framework reveals close connections between these seemingly quite different algorithms. In particular, it resolves the myth about these methods in using either the top eigenvectors of a dense matrix, or the bottom eigenvectors of a sparse matrix --- these two eigenspaces are exactly aligned at primal-dual optimality.
Lin Xiao 0003, Jun Sun 0003, Stephen P. Boyd
ICML2