Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Oded Schramm

dblp:s/OdedSchramm · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2008
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 3

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
3 papers
Computational complexity · 86% Graph algorithms and graph theory · 14%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computational complexity › query complexity
decision tree complexity
0.122005
Balanced boolean functions that can be evaluated so that every input bit is unlikely to be read · STOC 2005
Every decision tree has an in.uential variable · FOCS 2005
Computational complexity › query complexity › decision tree complexity
randomized query complexity
0.122005
Balanced boolean functions that can be evaluated so that every input bit is unlikely to be read · STOC 2005
Every decision tree has an in.uential variable · FOCS 2005
Computational complexity › property testing
graph property testing
0.112008
Every minor-closed property of sparse graphs is testable · STOC 2008
Graph algorithms and graph theory › graph minors
minor-closed graph properties
0.112008
Every minor-closed property of sparse graphs is testable · STOC 2008
Computational complexity
boolean function analysis
0.112005
Every decision tree has an in.uential variable · FOCS 2005
Computational complexity › boolean function complexity
boolean function evaluation
0.112005
Balanced boolean functions that can be evaluated so that every input bit is unlikely to be read · STOC 2005
Computational complexity › boolean function analysis
influence of variables
0.112005
Every decision tree has an in.uential variable · FOCS 2005
Computational complexity
query complexity
0.112005
Every decision tree has an in.uential variable · FOCS 2005

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

variance inequality · 0.1fourier analysis · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2008 Every minor-closed property of sparse graphs is testable
Itai Benjamini, Oded Schramm, Asaf Shapira
STOC2
2005 Every decision tree has an in.uential variable
abstract
We prove that for any decision tree calculating a Boolean function f : {-1,1}/sup n/ /spl rarr/ {-1, 1}, Var[f] /spl les/ /spl Sigma/ /sub i=1/ /sup n/ /spl delta//sup i/Inf/sub i/(f), i = 1 where /spl delta//sup i/ is the probability that the ith input variable is read and Inf/sub i/(f) is the influence of the ith variable on f. The variance, influence and probability are taken with respect to an arbitrary product measure on {-1, 1}/sup n/n. It follows that the minimum depth of a decision tree calculating a given balanced function is at least the reciprocal of the largest influence of any input variable. Likewise, any balanced Boolean function with a decision tree of depth d has a variable with influence at least 1/d. The only previous nontrivial lower bound known was /spl Omega/(d2/sup -d/). Our inequality has many generalizations, allowing us to prove influence lower bounds for randomized decision trees, decision trees on arbitrary product probability spaces, and decision trees with nonBoolean outputs. As an application of our results we give a very easy proof that the randomized query complexity of nontrivial monotone graph properties is at least/spl Omega/(v/sup 4/3//p/sup 1/3/), where v is the number of vertices and p /spl les/ 1/2 is the critical threshold probability. This supersedes the milestone /spl Omega/(v/sup 4/3//p/sup 1/3/) bound of Hajnal (1991) and is sometimes superior to the best known lower bounds of Chakrabarti-Khot (2001) and Friedgut-Kahn-Wigderson (2002).
Ryan O'Donnell, Michael E. Saks, Oded Schramm, Rocco A. Servedio
FOCS3
2005 Balanced boolean functions that can be evaluated so that every input bit is unlikely to be read
abstract
A Boolean function of n bits is balanced if it takes the value 1 with probability 1⁄2. We exhibit a balanced Boolean function with a randomized evaluation procedure (with probability 0 of making a mistake) so that on uniformly random inputs, no input bit is read with probability more than Θ(n-1/2√ log n). We construct a balanced monotone Boolean function and a randomized algorithm computing it for which each bit is read with probability Θ(n-1⁄3 log n). We then show that for any randomized algorithm for evaluating a balanced Boolean function, when the input bits are uniformly random, there is some input bit that is read with probability at least Θ(n-1𔊪). For balanced monotone Boolean functions, there is some input bit that is read with probability at least Θ(n-1𔊫).
Itai Benjamini, Oded Schramm, David Bruce Wilson
STOC2