Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Stefan Schirra

dblp:s/SSchirra · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
29ranked-venue papers
5as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
0009-0006-5928-1494ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 21 · 5 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 6Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
10 papers
Computational geometry · 89% Algorithms and data structures · 11%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computational geometry › robust geometric computation
exact geometric computation
0.131999
Efficient Exact Geometric Computation Made Easy · SCG 1999
A Strong and Easily Computable Separation Bound for Arithmetic Expressions Involving Square Roots · SODA 1997
Exact Geometric Computation in LEDA · SCG 1995
Computational geometry › geometric data structures
moving points
0.011997
Computing the Minimum Diameter for Moving Points: An Exact Implementation Using Parametric Search · SCG 1997
Computational geometry
motion planning
0.021993
Moving a Disc Between Polygons · SCG 1993
Approximate Motion Planning and the Complexity of the Boundary of the Union of Simple Geometric Figures · SCG 1990
Computational geometry › motion planning
polygonal obstacles
0.011993
Moving a Disc Between Polygons · SCG 1993
Computational geometry › shape analysis
boundary complexity
0.011990
Approximate Motion Planning and the Complexity of the Boundary of the Union of Simple Geometric Figures · SCG 1990
Computational geometry › combinatorial complexity
union of geometric objects
0.011990
Approximate Motion Planning and the Complexity of the Boundary of the Union of Simple Geometric Figures · SCG 1990
Algorithms and data structures
algebraic computation
0.011997
A Strong and Easily Computable Separation Bound for Arithmetic Expressions Involving Square Roots · SODA 1997

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

parametric search · 0.0computational basis · 0.0program checker · 0.0geometric computation · 0.0approximation algorithm · 0.0geometric analysis · 0.0approximation · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 Minimizing the continuous diameter when augmenting a geometric tree with a shortcut
Jean-Lou De Carufel, Carsten Grimm, Anil Maheshwari, Stefan Schirra, Michiel H. M. Smid
Comput. Geom.4
2017 Minimizing the Continuous Diameter When Augmenting a Tree with a Shortcut
Jean-Lou De Carufel, Carsten Grimm, Stefan Schirra, Michiel H. M. Smid
WADS3
2013 A Note on Sekigawa's Zero Separation Bound
Stefan Schirra
CASC1
2009 A Separation Bound for Real Algebraic Expressions
Christoph Burnikel, Stefan Funke, Kurt Mehlhorn, Stefan Schirra, Susanne Schmitt
Algorithmica4
2008 How Reliable Are Practical Point-in-Polygon Strategies?
Stefan Schirra
ESA1
2008 Classroom examples of robustness problems in geometric computations
Lutz Kettner, Kurt Mehlhorn, Sylvain Pion, Stefan Schirra, Chee-Keng Yap
Comput. Geom.4
2006 Reply to "Backward Error Analysis ..."
Lutz Kettner, Kurt Mehlhorn, Sylvain Pion, Stefan Schirra, Chee-Keng Yap
ICCSA (1)4
2004 Classroom Examples of Robustness Problems in Geometric Computations
Lutz Kettner, Kurt Mehlhorn, Sylvain Pion, Stefan Schirra, Chee-Keng Yap
ESA4
2001 A Separation Bound for Real Algebraic Expressions
abstract
Real algebraic expressions are expressions whose leaves are integers and whose internal nodes are additions, subtractions, multiplications, divisions, k -th root operations for integral k , and taking roots of polynomials whose coefficients are given by the values of subexpressions. We consider the sign computation of real algebraic expressions, a task vital for the implementation of geometric algorithms. We prove a new separation bound for real algebraic expressions and compare it analytically and experimentally with previous bounds. The bound is used in the sign test of the number type leda::real .
Christoph Burnikel, Stefan Funke, Kurt Mehlhorn, Stefan Schirra, Susanne Schmitt
ESA4
2000 A Strong and Easily Computable Separation Bound for Arithmetic Expressions Involving Radicals
Christoph Burnikel, Rudolf Fleischer, Kurt Mehlhorn, Stefan Schirra
Algorithmica4
2000 On the design of CGAL a computational geometry algorithms library
abstract
CGAL is a Computational Geometry Algorithms Library written in C++, which is being developed by research groups in Europe and Israel. The goal is to make the large body of geometric algorithms developed in the field of computational geometry available for industrial application. We discuss the major design goals for CGAL, which are correctness, flexibility, ease-of-use, efficiency, and robustness, and present our approach to reach these goals. Generic programming using templates in C++ plays a central role in the architecture of CGAL. We give a short introduction to generic programming in C++, compare it to the object-oriented programming paradigm, and present examples where both paradigms are used effectively in CGAL. Moreover, we give an overview of the current structure of the CGAL-library and consider software engineering aspects in the CGAL-project. Copyright © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Andreas Fabri, Geert-Jan Giezeman, Lutz Kettner, Stefan Schirra, Sven Schönherr
Softw. Pract. Exp.4
1999 A Case Study on the Cost of Geometric Computing
Stefan Schirra
ALENEX1
1999 Efficient Exact Geometric Computation Made Easy
abstract
We show that the combination of the CGAL framework for geometric computation and the number type ledareal yields easy-to-write, correct and efficient geometric programs.
Christoph Burnikel, Rudolf Fleischer, Kurt Mehlhorn, Stefan Schirra
SCG4
1999 Checking geometric programs or verification of geometric structures
abstract
A program checker verifies that a particular program execution is correct. We give simple and efficient program checkers for some basic geometric tasks. We report about our experiences with program checking in the context of the LEDA system. We discuss program checking for data structures that have to rely on user-provided functions.
Kurt Mehlhorn, Stefan Näher, Michael Seel, Raimund Seidel, Thomas Schilz, Stefan Schirra, Christian Uhrig
Comput. Geom.6
1998 A computational basis for higher-dimensional computational geometry and applications
abstract
In this paper we describe and discuss a kernel for higher-dimensional computational geometry and we present its application in the calculation of convex hulls and delaunay triangulations.We introduce the basic data types like points, vectors, directions, hyperplanes, segments, rays, lines, spheres, affine transformations, and operations connecting these types.The description consists of a motivation for the basic class layout as well as topics like layered software design, runtime correctness via checking routines and documentation issues.Finally we shortly describe the usage of the kernel in the application domain.
Kurt Mehlhorn, Michael Müller 0002, Stefan Näher, Stefan Schirra, Michael Seel, Christian Uhrig, Joachim Ziegler
Comput. Geom.4
1997 A Computational Basis for Higher-Dimensional Computational Geometry and Applications
Kurt Mehlhorn, Michael Müller 0002, Stefan Näher, Stefan Schirra, Michael Seel, Christian Uhrig, Joachim Ziegler
SCG4
1997 Computing the Minimum Diameter for Moving Points: An Exact Implementation Using Parametric Search
abstract
Article Computing the minimum diameter for moving points: an exact implementation using parametric search Share on Authors: Jörg Schwerdt Fakultät für Informatik, Otto-von-Guericke-Universität, Magdeburg, Universitätsplatz 2, D-39106 Magdeburg, Germany Fakultät für Informatik, Otto-von-Guericke-Universität, Magdeburg, Universitätsplatz 2, D-39106 Magdeburg, GermanyView Profile , Michiel Smid Fakultät für Informatik, Otto-von-Guericke-Universität, Magdeburg, Universitätsplatz 2, D-39106 Magdeburg, Germany Fakultät für Informatik, Otto-von-Guericke-Universität, Magdeburg, Universitätsplatz 2, D-39106 Magdeburg, GermanyView Profile , Stefan Schirra Max-Planck-Institut für Informatik, Im Stadtwald, D-66123 Saarbrücken, Germany Max-Planck-Institut für Informatik, Im Stadtwald, D-66123 Saarbrücken, GermanyView Profile Authors Info & Claims SCG '97: Proceedings of the thirteenth annual symposium on Computational geometryAugust 1997 Pages 466–468https://doi.org/10.1145/262839.263087Online:01 August 1997Publication History 6citation275DownloadsMetricsTotal Citations6Total Downloads275Last 12 Months2Last 6 weeks1 Get Citation AlertsNew Citation Alert added!This alert has been successfully added and will be sent to:You will be notified whenever a record that you have chosen has been cited.To manage your alert preferences, click on the button below.Manage my AlertsNew Citation Alert!Please log in to your account Save to BinderSave to BinderCreate a New BinderNameCancelCreateExport CitationPublisher SiteGet Access
Jörg Schwerdt, Michiel H. M. Smid, Stefan Schirra
SCG3
1997 A Strong and Easily Computable Separation Bound for Arithmetic Expressions Involving Square Roots
Christoph Burnikel, Rudolf Fleischer, Kurt Mehlhorn, Stefan Schirra
SODA4
1996 Checking Geometric Programs or Verification of Geometric Structures
abstract
A program checker verifies that a particular program execution is correct.We give simple and efficient program checkers for some basic geometric tasks.We report about our experiences with program checking in the context of the LEDA system.We discuss program checking for data structures that have to rely on userprovided functions.
Kurt Mehlhorn, Stefan Näher, Thomas Schilz, Stefan Schirra, Michael Seel, Raimund Seidel, Christian Uhrig
SCG4
1996 Queries on Voronoi Diagrams of Moving Points
Olivier Devillers, Mordecai J. Golin, Klara Kedem, Stefan Schirra
Comput. Geom.4
1995 Exact Geometric Computation in LEDA
abstract
No abstract available.
Christoph Burnikel, Jochen Könemann, Kurt Mehlhorn, Stefan Näher, Stefan Schirra, Christian Uhrig
SCG5
1994 How to Compute the Voronoi Diagram of Line Segments: Theoretical and Experimental Results
Christoph Burnikel, Kurt Mehlhorn, Stefan Schirra
ESA3
1994 On Degeneracy in Geometric Computations
Christoph Burnikel, Kurt Mehlhorn, Stefan Schirra
SODA3
1994 Approximate Decision Algorithms for Point Set Congruence
Paul J. Heffernan, Stefan Schirra
Comput. Geom.2
1993 Moving a Disc Between Polygons
abstract
No abstract available.
Stefan Schirra
SCG1
1992 Approximate Decision Algorithms for Point Set Congruence
abstract
Approximate decision algorithms for point set congruence
Paul J. Heffernan, Stefan Schirra
SCG2
1992 Approximate Motion Planning and the Complexity of the Boundary of the Union of Simple Geometric Figures
abstract
We study rigid motions of a rectangle amidst polygonal obstacles. The best known algorithms for this problem have running time Ω(n2) where n is the number of obstacle corners. We introduce the tightness of a motion planning problem as a measure of the difficulty of a planning problem in an intuitive sense and describe an algorithm with running time ο((a/b · 1/ε crit + 1)n(log n)2), where a ≥ b are the lengths of the sides of a rectangle and εcrit is the tightness of the problem. We show further that the complexity (= number of vertices) of the boundary of n bow-ties (c.f. Figure 1.1) is Ο(n). Similar results for the union of other simple geometric figures such as triangles and wedges are also presented.
Helmut Alt, Rudolf Fleischer, Michael Kaufmann 0001, Kurt Mehlhorn, Stefan Näher, Stefan Schirra, Christian Uhrig
Algorithmica6
1992 Approximate Decision Algorithms for Approximate Congruence
Stefan Schirra
Inf. Process. Lett.1
1990 Approximate Motion Planning and the Complexity of the Boundary of the Union of Simple Geometric Figures
Helmut Alt, Rudolf Fleischer, Michael Kaufmann 0001, Kurt Mehlhorn, Stefan Näher, Stefan Schirra, Christian Uhrig
SCG6