Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Michael E. Tipping

dblp:t/MichaelETipping · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
16ranked-venue papers
8as first author
0since 2021 · last 2005
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 15 · 8 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
9 papers
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 52% Representation and self-supervised learning · 21% Kernel, tree and ensemble methods · 14%
Computer graphics and multimedia
2 papers
Image and video processing · 72% Visualization and visual analytics · 28%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Information retrieval · 100%

Topics — the 24 heaviest of 26, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference › sparse bayesian learning
relevance vector machine
0.132001
Sparse Bayesian Learning and the Relevance Vector Machine · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2001
Analysis of Sparse Bayesian Learning · NIPS 2001
The Relevance Vector Machine · NIPS 1999
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference
sparse bayesian learning
0.132001
Sparse Bayesian Learning and the Relevance Vector Machine · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2001
Analysis of Sparse Bayesian Learning · NIPS 2001
The Relevance Vector Machine · NIPS 1999
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
kernel methods
0.022003
Use of the Zero-Norm with Linear Models and Kernel Methods · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2003
The Relevance Vector Machine · NIPS 1999
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
dimensionality reduction
0.022000
Sparse Kernel Principal Component Analysis · NIPS 2000
Probabilistic Visualisation of High-Dimensional Binary Data · NIPS 1998
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › dimensionality reduction
feature selection
0.012003
Use of the Zero-Norm with Linear Models and Kernel Methods · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2003
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
regularized learning
0.012003
Use of the Zero-Norm with Linear Models and Kernel Methods · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2003
Information retrieval › retrieval models
language model
0.012003
Bayesian extension to the language model for ad hoc information retrieval · SIGIR 2003
Image and video processing › super-resolution
bayesian super-resolution
0.012002
Bayesian Image Super-Resolution · NIPS 2002
Image and video processing
image registration
0.012002
Bayesian Image Super-Resolution · NIPS 2002
Image and video processing
super-resolution
0.012002
Bayesian Image Super-Resolution · NIPS 2002
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference
bayesian model selection
0.012001
Sparse Bayesian Learning and the Relevance Vector Machine · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2001
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference › prior distribution
sparsity prior
0.012001
Sparse Bayesian Learning and the Relevance Vector Machine · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2001
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › dimensionality reduction › principal component analysis
kernel principal component analysis
0.012000
Sparse Kernel Principal Component Analysis · NIPS 2000
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods › kernel methods
sparse kernel methods
0.012000
Sparse Kernel Principal Component Analysis · NIPS 2000
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
latent variable model
0.011998
A Hierarchical Latent Variable Model for Data Visualization · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1998
Visualization and visual analytics
data visualization
0.011998
A Hierarchical Latent Variable Model for Data Visualization · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1998
Visualization and visual analytics
dimensionality reduction
0.011998
A Hierarchical Latent Variable Model for Data Visualization · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1998
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › feedforward neural network
radial basis function network
0.011996
NeuroScale: Novel Topographic Feature Extraction using RBF Networks · NIPS 1996
Computer vision › 3D vision › remote sensing
terrain feature extraction
0.011996
NeuroScale: Novel Topographic Feature Extraction using RBF Networks · NIPS 1996
Information retrieval › retrieval models
ad-hoc retrieval
0.012003
Bayesian extension to the language model for ad hoc information retrieval · SIGIR 2003
Information retrieval › retrieval models › language model
smoothing
0.012003
Bayesian extension to the language model for ad hoc information retrieval · SIGIR 2003
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes
gaussian process
0.012002
Bayesian Image Super-Resolution · NIPS 2002
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › parameter estimation
maximum likelihood estimation
0.012000
Sparse Kernel Principal Component Analysis · NIPS 2000
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › parameter estimation
expectation-maximization
0.011998
A Hierarchical Latent Variable Model for Data Visualization · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1998

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

bayesian inference · 0.2marginalization · 0.1gaussian process prior · 0.1linear model · 0.0linear interpolation · 0.0laplace smoothing · 0.0kernel methods · 0.0bayes-smoothing · 0.0marginal likelihood maximization · 0.0automatic relevance determination · 0.0sparsity approximation · 0.0maximum likelihood · 0.0kernel PCA · 0.0hierarchical mixture model · 0.0expectation-maximization · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2005 Variational inference for Student-t models: Robust Bayesian interpolation and generalised component analysis
Michael E. Tipping, Neil D. Lawrence
Neurocomputing1
2003 Bayesian extension to the language model for ad hoc information retrieval
abstract
We propose a Bayesian extension to the ad-hoc Language Model. Many smoothed estimators used for the multinomial query model in ad-hoc Language Models (including Laplace and Bayes-smoothing) are approximations to the Bayesian predictive distribution. In this paper we derive the full predictive distribution in a form amenable to implementation by classical IR models, and then compare it to other currently used estimators. In our experiments the proposed model outperforms Bayes-smoothing, and its combination with linear interpolation smoothing outperforms all other estimators.
Hugo Zaragoza, Djoerd Hiemstra, Michael E. Tipping
SIGIR3
2003 Use of the Zero-Norm with Linear Models and Kernel Methods
Jason Weston, André Elisseeff, Bernhard Schölkopf, Michael E. Tipping
J. Mach. Learn. Res.4
2002 Bayesian Image Super-Resolution
abstract
The extraction of a single high-quality image from a set of low(cid:173) resolution images is an important problem which arises in fields such as remote sensing, surveillance, medical imaging and the ex(cid:173) traction of still images from video. Typical approaches are based on the use of cross-correlation to register the images followed by the inversion of the transformation from the unknown high reso(cid:173) lution image to the observed low resolution images, using regular(cid:173) ization to resolve the ill-posed nature of the inversion process. In this paper we develop a Bayesian treatment of the super-resolution problem in which the likelihood function for the image registra(cid:173) tion parameters is based on a marginalization over the unknown high-resolution image. This approach allows us to estimate the unknown point spread function, and is rendered tractable through the introduction of a Gaussian process prior over images. Results indicate a significant improvement over techniques based on MAP (maximum a-posteriori) point optimization of the high resolution image and associated registration parameters.
Michael E. Tipping, Christopher M. Bishop
NIPS1
2001 A Variational Approach to Robust Regression
Anita Faul, Michael E. Tipping
ICANN2
2001 Analysis of Sparse Bayesian Learning
abstract
The recent introduction of the 'relevance vector machine' has effec(cid:173) tively demonstrated how sparsity may be obtained in generalised linear models within a Bayesian framework. Using a particular form of Gaussian parameter prior, 'learning' is the maximisation, with respect to hyperparameters, of the marginal likelihood of the data. This paper studies the properties of that objective func(cid:173) tion, and demonstrates that conditioned on an individual hyper(cid:173) parameter, the marginal likelihood has a unique maximum which is computable in closed form. It is further shown that if a derived 'sparsity criterion' is satisfied, this maximum is exactly equivalent to 'pruning' the corresponding parameter from the model.
Anita Faul, Michael E. Tipping
NIPS2
2001 Sparse Bayesian Learning and the Relevance Vector Machine
Michael E. Tipping
J. Mach. Learn. Res.1
2000 Sparse Kernel Principal Component Analysis
abstract
'Kernel' principal component analysis (PCA) is an elegant non(cid:173) linear generalisation of the popular linear data analysis method, where a kernel function implicitly defines a nonlinear transforma(cid:173) tion into a feature space wherein standard PCA is performed. Un(cid:173) fortunately, the technique is not 'sparse', since the components thus obtained are expressed in terms of kernels associated with ev(cid:173) ery training vector. This paper shows that by approximating the covariance matrix in feature space by a reduced number of exam(cid:173) ple vectors, using a maximum-likelihood approach, we may obtain a highly sparse form of kernel PCA without loss of effectiveness.
Michael E. Tipping
NIPS1
2000 Variational Relevance Vector Machines
Christopher M. Bishop, Michael E. Tipping
UAI2
1999 The Relevance Vector Machine
Michael E. Tipping
NIPS1
1999 Mixtures of Probabilistic Principal Component Analysers
abstract
Principal component analysis (PCA) is one of the most popular techniques for processing, compressing, and visualizing data, although its effectiveness is limited by its global linearity. While nonlinear variants of PCA have been proposed, an alternative paradigm is to capture data complexity by a combination of local linear PCA projections. However, conventional PCA does not correspond to a probability density, and so there is no unique way to combine PCA models. Therefore, previous attempts to formulate mixture models for PCA have been ad hoc to some extent. In this article, PCA is formulated within a maximum likelihood framework, based on a specific form of gaussian latent variable model. This leads to a well-defined mixture model for probabilistic principal component analyzers, whose parameters can be determined using an expectation-maximization algorithm. We discuss the advantages of this model in the context of clustering, density modeling, and local dimensionality reduction, and we demonstrate its application to image compression and handwritten digit recognition.
Michael E. Tipping, Christopher M. Bishop
Neural Comput.1
1998 Probabilistic Visualisation of High-Dimensional Binary Data
Michael E. Tipping
NIPS1
1998 Shadow targets: A novel algorithm for topographic projections by radial basis functions
Michael E. Tipping, David Lowe 0001
Neurocomputing1
1998 A Hierarchical Latent Variable Model for Data Visualization
abstract
Visualization has proven to be a powerful and widely-applicable tool for the analysis and interpretation of multivariate data. Most visualization algorithms aim to find a projection from the data space down to a two-dimensional visualization space. However, for complex data sets living in a high-dimensional space, it is unlikely that a single two-dimensional projection can reveal all of the interesting structure. We therefore introduce a hierarchical visualization algorithm which allows the complete data set to be visualized at the top level, with clusters and subclusters of data points visualized at deeper levels. The algorithm is based on a hierarchical mixture of latent variable models, whose parameters are estimated using the expectation-maximization algorithm. We demonstrate the principle of the approach on a toy data set, and we then apply the algorithm to the visualization of a synthetic data set in 12 dimensions obtained from a simulation of multiphase flows in oil pipelines, and to data in 36 dimensions derived from satellite images.
Christopher M. Bishop, Michael E. Tipping
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.2
1996 NeuroScale: Novel Topographic Feature Extraction using RBF Networks
Michael E. Tipping
NIPS2
1996 Feed-Forward Neural Networks and Topographic Mappings for Exploratory Data Analysis
David Lowe 0001, Michael E. Tipping
Neural Comput. Appl.2