Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Michael E. Tipping
dblp:t/MichaelETipping
· DBLP profile ↗
16ranked-venue papers
8as first author
0since 2021 · last 2005
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 15 · 8 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
9 papers |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 52% Representation and self-supervised learning · 21% Kernel, tree and ensemble methods · 14% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
2 papers |
Image and video processing · 72% Visualization and visual analytics · 28% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Information retrieval · 100% |
Topics — the 24 heaviest of 26, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference › sparse bayesian learning
relevance vector machine |
0.1 | 3 | 2001 | Sparse Bayesian Learning and the Relevance Vector Machine · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2001 Analysis of Sparse Bayesian Learning · NIPS 2001 The Relevance Vector Machine · NIPS 1999 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference
sparse bayesian learning |
0.1 | 3 | 2001 | Sparse Bayesian Learning and the Relevance Vector Machine · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2001 Analysis of Sparse Bayesian Learning · NIPS 2001 The Relevance Vector Machine · NIPS 1999 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
kernel methods |
0.0 | 2 | 2003 | Use of the Zero-Norm with Linear Models and Kernel Methods · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2003 The Relevance Vector Machine · NIPS 1999 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
dimensionality reduction |
0.0 | 2 | 2000 | Sparse Kernel Principal Component Analysis · NIPS 2000 Probabilistic Visualisation of High-Dimensional Binary Data · NIPS 1998 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › dimensionality reduction
feature selection |
0.0 | 1 | 2003 | Use of the Zero-Norm with Linear Models and Kernel Methods · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2003 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
regularized learning |
0.0 | 1 | 2003 | Use of the Zero-Norm with Linear Models and Kernel Methods · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2003 |
Information retrieval › retrieval models
language model |
0.0 | 1 | 2003 | Bayesian extension to the language model for ad hoc information retrieval · SIGIR 2003 |
Image and video processing › super-resolution
bayesian super-resolution |
0.0 | 1 | 2002 | Bayesian Image Super-Resolution · NIPS 2002 |
Image and video processing
image registration |
0.0 | 1 | 2002 | Bayesian Image Super-Resolution · NIPS 2002 |
Image and video processing
super-resolution |
0.0 | 1 | 2002 | Bayesian Image Super-Resolution · NIPS 2002 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference
bayesian model selection |
0.0 | 1 | 2001 | Sparse Bayesian Learning and the Relevance Vector Machine · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2001 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference › prior distribution
sparsity prior |
0.0 | 1 | 2001 | Sparse Bayesian Learning and the Relevance Vector Machine · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2001 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › dimensionality reduction › principal component analysis
kernel principal component analysis |
0.0 | 1 | 2000 | Sparse Kernel Principal Component Analysis · NIPS 2000 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods › kernel methods
sparse kernel methods |
0.0 | 1 | 2000 | Sparse Kernel Principal Component Analysis · NIPS 2000 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
latent variable model |
0.0 | 1 | 1998 | A Hierarchical Latent Variable Model for Data Visualization · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1998 |
Visualization and visual analytics
data visualization |
0.0 | 1 | 1998 | A Hierarchical Latent Variable Model for Data Visualization · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1998 |
Visualization and visual analytics
dimensionality reduction |
0.0 | 1 | 1998 | A Hierarchical Latent Variable Model for Data Visualization · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1998 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › feedforward neural network
radial basis function network |
0.0 | 1 | 1996 | NeuroScale: Novel Topographic Feature Extraction using RBF Networks · NIPS 1996 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › remote sensing
terrain feature extraction |
0.0 | 1 | 1996 | NeuroScale: Novel Topographic Feature Extraction using RBF Networks · NIPS 1996 |
Information retrieval › retrieval models
ad-hoc retrieval |
0.0 | 1 | 2003 | Bayesian extension to the language model for ad hoc information retrieval · SIGIR 2003 |
Information retrieval › retrieval models › language model
smoothing |
0.0 | 1 | 2003 | Bayesian extension to the language model for ad hoc information retrieval · SIGIR 2003 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes
gaussian process |
0.0 | 1 | 2002 | Bayesian Image Super-Resolution · NIPS 2002 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › parameter estimation
maximum likelihood estimation |
0.0 | 1 | 2000 | Sparse Kernel Principal Component Analysis · NIPS 2000 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › parameter estimation
expectation-maximization |
0.0 | 1 | 1998 | A Hierarchical Latent Variable Model for Data Visualization · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1998 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
bayesian inference · 0.2marginalization · 0.1gaussian process prior · 0.1linear model · 0.0linear interpolation · 0.0laplace smoothing · 0.0kernel methods · 0.0bayes-smoothing · 0.0marginal likelihood maximization · 0.0automatic relevance determination · 0.0sparsity approximation · 0.0maximum likelihood · 0.0kernel PCA · 0.0hierarchical mixture model · 0.0expectation-maximization · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 | Variational inference for Student-t models: Robust Bayesian interpolation and generalised component analysis
Michael E. Tipping, Neil D. Lawrence |
Neurocomputing | 1 |
| 2003 | Bayesian extension to the language model for ad hoc information retrievalabstractWe propose a Bayesian extension to the ad-hoc Language Model. Many smoothed estimators used for the multinomial query model in ad-hoc Language Models (including Laplace and Bayes-smoothing) are approximations to the Bayesian predictive distribution. In this paper we derive the full predictive distribution in a form amenable to implementation by classical IR models, and then compare it to other currently used estimators. In our experiments the proposed model outperforms Bayes-smoothing, and its combination with linear interpolation smoothing outperforms all other estimators. Hugo Zaragoza, Djoerd Hiemstra, Michael E. Tipping |
SIGIR | 3 |
| 2003 | Use of the Zero-Norm with Linear Models and Kernel Methods
Jason Weston, André Elisseeff, Bernhard Schölkopf, Michael E. Tipping |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 4 |
| 2002 | Bayesian Image Super-ResolutionabstractThe extraction of a single high-quality image from a set of low(cid:173) resolution images is an important problem which arises in fields such as remote sensing, surveillance, medical imaging and the ex(cid:173) traction of still images from video. Typical approaches are based on the use of cross-correlation to register the images followed by the inversion of the transformation from the unknown high reso(cid:173) lution image to the observed low resolution images, using regular(cid:173) ization to resolve the ill-posed nature of the inversion process. In this paper we develop a Bayesian treatment of the super-resolution problem in which the likelihood function for the image registra(cid:173) tion parameters is based on a marginalization over the unknown high-resolution image. This approach allows us to estimate the unknown point spread function, and is rendered tractable through the introduction of a Gaussian process prior over images. Results indicate a significant improvement over techniques based on MAP (maximum a-posteriori) point optimization of the high resolution image and associated registration parameters. Michael E. Tipping, Christopher M. Bishop |
NIPS | 1 |
| 2001 | A Variational Approach to Robust Regression
Anita Faul, Michael E. Tipping |
ICANN | 2 |
| 2001 | Analysis of Sparse Bayesian LearningabstractThe recent introduction of the 'relevance vector machine' has effec(cid:173) tively demonstrated how sparsity may be obtained in generalised linear models within a Bayesian framework. Using a particular form of Gaussian parameter prior, 'learning' is the maximisation, with respect to hyperparameters, of the marginal likelihood of the data. This paper studies the properties of that objective func(cid:173) tion, and demonstrates that conditioned on an individual hyper(cid:173) parameter, the marginal likelihood has a unique maximum which is computable in closed form. It is further shown that if a derived 'sparsity criterion' is satisfied, this maximum is exactly equivalent to 'pruning' the corresponding parameter from the model. Anita Faul, Michael E. Tipping |
NIPS | 2 |
| 2001 | Sparse Bayesian Learning and the Relevance Vector Machine
Michael E. Tipping |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 1 |
| 2000 | Sparse Kernel Principal Component Analysisabstract'Kernel' principal component analysis (PCA) is an elegant non(cid:173) linear generalisation of the popular linear data analysis method, where a kernel function implicitly defines a nonlinear transforma(cid:173) tion into a feature space wherein standard PCA is performed. Un(cid:173) fortunately, the technique is not 'sparse', since the components thus obtained are expressed in terms of kernels associated with ev(cid:173) ery training vector. This paper shows that by approximating the covariance matrix in feature space by a reduced number of exam(cid:173) ple vectors, using a maximum-likelihood approach, we may obtain a highly sparse form of kernel PCA without loss of effectiveness. Michael E. Tipping |
NIPS | 1 |
| 2000 | Variational Relevance Vector Machines
Christopher M. Bishop, Michael E. Tipping |
UAI | 2 |
| 1999 | The Relevance Vector Machine
Michael E. Tipping |
NIPS | 1 |
| 1999 | Mixtures of Probabilistic Principal Component AnalysersabstractPrincipal component analysis (PCA) is one of the most popular techniques for processing, compressing, and visualizing data, although its effectiveness is limited by its global linearity. While nonlinear variants of PCA have been proposed, an alternative paradigm is to capture data complexity by a combination of local linear PCA projections. However, conventional PCA does not correspond to a probability density, and so there is no unique way to combine PCA models. Therefore, previous attempts to formulate mixture models for PCA have been ad hoc to some extent. In this article, PCA is formulated within a maximum likelihood framework, based on a specific form of gaussian latent variable model. This leads to a well-defined mixture model for probabilistic principal component analyzers, whose parameters can be determined using an expectation-maximization algorithm. We discuss the advantages of this model in the context of clustering, density modeling, and local dimensionality reduction, and we demonstrate its application to image compression and handwritten digit recognition. Michael E. Tipping, Christopher M. Bishop |
Neural Comput. | 1 |
| 1998 | Probabilistic Visualisation of High-Dimensional Binary Data
Michael E. Tipping |
NIPS | 1 |
| 1998 | Shadow targets: A novel algorithm for topographic projections by radial basis functions
Michael E. Tipping, David Lowe 0001 |
Neurocomputing | 1 |
| 1998 | A Hierarchical Latent Variable Model for Data VisualizationabstractVisualization has proven to be a powerful and widely-applicable tool for the analysis and interpretation of multivariate data. Most visualization algorithms aim to find a projection from the data space down to a two-dimensional visualization space. However, for complex data sets living in a high-dimensional space, it is unlikely that a single two-dimensional projection can reveal all of the interesting structure. We therefore introduce a hierarchical visualization algorithm which allows the complete data set to be visualized at the top level, with clusters and subclusters of data points visualized at deeper levels. The algorithm is based on a hierarchical mixture of latent variable models, whose parameters are estimated using the expectation-maximization algorithm. We demonstrate the principle of the approach on a toy data set, and we then apply the algorithm to the visualization of a synthetic data set in 12 dimensions obtained from a simulation of multiphase flows in oil pipelines, and to data in 36 dimensions derived from satellite images. Christopher M. Bishop, Michael E. Tipping |
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. | 2 |
| 1996 | NeuroScale: Novel Topographic Feature Extraction using RBF Networks
Michael E. Tipping |
NIPS | 2 |
| 1996 | Feed-Forward Neural Networks and Topographic Mappings for Exploratory Data Analysis
David Lowe 0001, Michael E. Tipping |
Neural Comput. Appl. | 2 |