Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Paul E. Utgoff

dblp:u/PaulEUtgoff · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
31ranked-venue papers
13as first author
0since 2021 · last 2012
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 30 · 12 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 8 · 4 first-authorHuman-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
11 papers
Reinforcement learning · 27% Representation and self-supervised learning · 25% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 22%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
4 papers
Compilers and program optimization · 82% Program synthesis and code generation · 18%
Theoretical computer science
4 papers
Approximation and online algorithms · 59% Automated reasoning and model checking · 22% Automata and formal languages · 15%

Topics — the 21 heaviest of 27, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › dimensionality reduction
feature selection
0.012004
Randomized Variable Elimination · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2004
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference
variable elimination
0.012004
Randomized Variable Elimination · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2004
Approximation and online algorithms
approximation algorithms
0.011999
Approximation Via Value Unification · ICML 1999
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
function approximation
0.011998
Classification Using Phi-Machines and Constructive Function Approximation · ICML 1998
Compilers and program optimization
instruction scheduling
0.011997
Learning to Schedule Straight-Line Code · NIPS 1997
Compilers and program optimization
straight-line programs
0.011997
Learning to Schedule Straight-Line Code · NIPS 1997
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › cost-sensitive learning
cost-sensitive classification
0.011994
Goal-Directed Classification Using Linear Machine Decision Trees · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1994
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods › decision tree
decision tree classifiers
0.011994
Goal-Directed Classification Using Linear Machine Decision Trees · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1994
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
image classification
0.011994
Goal-Directed Classification Using Linear Machine Decision Trees · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1994
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › automated feature generation
constructive induction
0.011991
Constructive Induction on Domain Information · AAAI 1991
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › value function approximation
evaluation function learning
0.011991
Two Kinds of Training Information For Evaluation Function Learning · AAAI 1991
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
value-based reinforcement learning
0.011991
Two Kinds of Training Information For Evaluation Function Learning · AAAI 1991
Program synthesis and code generation › inductive logic programming
constructive induction
0.011991
A Transformational Approach to Constructive Induction · ML 1991
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
temporal difference learning
0.011990
Explaining Temporal Differences to Create Useful Concepts for Evaluating States · AAAI 1990
Automata and formal languages
probabilistic automata
0.011998
Classification Using Phi-Machines and Constructive Function Approximation · ICML 1998
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › semantic representation
concept representation
0.011988
Perceptron Trees: A Case Study In Hybrid Concept Representations · AAAI 1988
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods › decision tree
perceptron decision tree
0.011988
Perceptron Trees: A Case Study In Hybrid Concept Representations · AAAI 1988
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › image classification
pixel classification
0.011994
Goal-Directed Classification Using Linear Machine Decision Trees · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1994
Algorithms and data structures
decision tree
0.011988
Perceptron Trees: A Case Study In Hybrid Concept Representations · AAAI 1988
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot control
0.011987
Learning to Control a Dynamic Physical System · AAAI 1987
Machine learning › Learning theory
inductive inference
0.011982
Acquisition of Appropriate Bias for Inductive Concept Learning · AAAI 1982

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

randomization · 0.0phi-machines · 0.0machine learning for scheduling · 0.0constructive induction · 0.0multivariate decision tree · 0.0linear machine decision tree · 0.0perceptron · 0.0temporal difference learning · 0.0decision trees · 0.0decision tree · 0.0reinforcement learning · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2012 Real-Time Combinatorial Optimization for Elevator Group Dispatching
abstract
A new algorithm Minimize Vexation, version 10 (MV10) for managing the elevators of a group is presented. Cars are dispatched in a way that maximizes efficiency for all the individuals who use an elevator in the group of elevators. Much information about the individuals in the group is inferred or estimated, greatly aiding the decision making process. A variety of questions regarding novel components of the algorithm are posed, and the answers are provided by way of deep statistical analysis. Insights are offered into the nature of various objective functions and their effects on system performance. The service time of the MV10 algorithm compares favorably to that of known approaches to the problem, demonstrated again through statistical analysis. For comparison purposes and perspective, the elevator dispatching problem is recast in a separate system in which all individual travel plans are known ahead of time, giving an indication of the best attainable efficiency.
Paul E. Utgoff, Margaret E. Connell
IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A1
2004 Incremental learning and concept drift: Editor's introduction
Miroslav Kubat, João Gama 0001, Paul E. Utgoff
Intell. Data Anal.3
2004 Randomized Variable Elimination
David J. Stracuzzi, Paul E. Utgoff
J. Mach. Learn. Res.2
2004 Classification Using Phi-Machines and Constructive Function Approximation
Doina Precup, Paul E. Utgoff
Mach. Learn.2
2002 Randomized Variable Elimination
David J. Stracuzzi, Paul E. Utgoff
ICML2
2002 Many-Layered Learning
abstract
We explore incremental assimilation of new knowledge by sequential learning. Of particular interest is how a network of many knowledge layers can be constructed in an on-line manner, such that the learned units represent building blocks of knowledge that serve to compress the overall representation and facilitate transfer. We motivate the need for many layers of knowledge, and we advocate sequential learning as an avenue for promoting the construction of layered knowledge structures. Finally, our novel STL algorithm demonstrates a method for simultaneously acquiring and organizing a collection of concepts and functions as a network from a stream of unstructured information.
Paul E. Utgoff, David J. Stracuzzi
Neural Comput.1
1999 Approximation Via Value Unification
Paul E. Utgoff, David J. Stracuzzi
ICML1
1999 Interactively Training Pixel Classifiers
abstract
For typical classification tasks, all training data are prepared in advance and are supplied to the classifier all at once. This is unnecessarily expensive and incurs overfitting problems, since the individual contributions of the training instances to the classifier are not known. We address this by proposing an interactive incremental framework for image classifier construction, where small numbers of training examples are supplied at each user interaction. After incorporating new training instances, the classifier immediately reclassifies the image to provide the user with instant feedback. This allows the user to choose additional informative training pixels from among the currently misclassified ones. Using a realistic terrain classification task, we demonstrate the potential of our method to generate small and accurate decision tree classifiers from surprisingly few training examples while avoiding overspecialization. We also briefly discuss the novel concept of hierarchical classification, where higher-level classifiers take as input the output of lower-level classifiers. We present preliminary results indicating that within our interactive framework, this is a practical approach to exploiting spatial relationships for classification.
Justus H. Piater, Edward M. Riseman, Paul E. Utgoff
Int. J. Pattern Recognit. Artif. Intell.3
1998 Classification Using Phi-Machines and Constructive Function Approximation
Doina Precup, Paul E. Utgoff
ICML2
1997 Learning to Schedule Straight-Line Code
J. Eliot B. Moss, Paul E. Utgoff, John Cavazos, Doina Precup, Darko Stefanovic, Carla E. Brodley, David Scheeff
NIPS2
1997 Decision Tree Induction Based on Efficient Tree Restructuring
Paul E. Utgoff, Neil C. Berkman, Jeffery A. Clouse
Mach. Learn.1
1995 Multivariate Decision Trees
Carla E. Brodley, Paul E. Utgoff
Mach. Learn.2
1994 An Improved Algorithm for Incremental Induction of Decision Trees
Paul E. Utgoff
ICML1
1994 Goal-Directed Classification Using Linear Machine Decision Trees
abstract
Recent work in feature-based classification has focused on nonparametric techniques that can classify instances even when the underlying feature distributions are unknown. The inference algorithms for training these techniques, however, are designed to maximize the accuracy of the classifier, with all errors weighted equally. In many applications, certain errors are far more costly than others, and the need arises for nonparametric classification techniques that can be trained to optimize task-specific cost functions. This correspondence reviews the linear machine decision tree (LMDT) algorithm for inducing multivariate decision trees, and shows how LMDT can be altered to induce decision trees that minimize arbitrary misclassification cost functions (MCF's). Demonstrations of pixel classification in outdoor scenes show how MCF's can optimize the performance of embedded classifiers within the context of larger image understanding systems.>
Bruce A. Draper, Carla E. Brodley, Paul E. Utgoff
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.3
1992 A Teaching Method for Reinforcement Learning
Jeffery A. Clouse, Paul E. Utgoff
ML2
1992 Automatic Feature Generation for Problem Solving Systems
Tom Fawcett, Paul E. Utgoff
ML2
1991 Constructive Induction on Domain Information
Jamie Callan, Paul E. Utgoff
AAAI2
1991 Two Kinds of Training Information For Evaluation Function Learning
Paul E. Utgoff, Jeffrey A. Clouse
AAAI1
1991 A Transformational Approach to Constructive Induction
Jamie Callan, Paul E. Utgoff
ML2
1991 A Hybrid Method for Feature Generation
Tom Fawcett, Paul E. Utgoff
ML2
1990 Explaining Temporal Differences to Create Useful Concepts for Evaluating States
Richard C. Yee, Sharad Saxena, Paul E. Utgoff, Andrew G. Barto
AAAI3
1990 An Incremental Method for Finding Multivariate Splits for Decision Trees
Paul E. Utgoff, Carla E. Brodley
ML1
1989 Improved Training Via Incremental Learning
Paul E. Utgoff
ML1
1989 Incremental Induction of Decision Trees
Paul E. Utgoff
Mach. Learn.1
1988 Perceptron Trees: A Case Study In Hybrid Concept Representations
Paul E. Utgoff
AAAI1
1988 ID5: An Incremental ID3
Paul E. Utgoff
ML1
1987 Learning to Control a Dynamic Physical System
Margaret E. Connell, Paul E. Utgoff
AAAI2
1987 Learning to control a dynamic physical system
abstract
This paper presents an approach to learning to control a dynamic physical system. The approach has been implemented in a program named CART, and applied to a simple physical system studied previously by several researchers. Experiments illustrate that a control method is learned in about 16 trials, an improvement over previous learning programs.
Margaret E. Connell, Paul E. Utgoff
Comput. Intell.2
1983 Adjusting Bias in Concept Learning
Paul E. Utgoff
IJCAI1
1982 Acquisition of Appropriate Bias for Inductive Concept Learning
Paul E. Utgoff, Tom M. Mitchell
AAAI1
1981 Learning Problem-Solving Heuristics Through Practice
Tom M. Mitchell, Paul E. Utgoff, Bernard Nudel, Ranan B. Banerji
IJCAI2