Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

David L. Waltz

dblp:w/DavidLWaltz · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
23ranked-venue papers
9as first author
0since 2021 · last 2012
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 16 · 8 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 8 · 6 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 4 · 1 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 2Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
5 papers
Energy systems and smart grids · 97% Bioinformatics and computational biology · 3%
Artificial intelligence
8 papers
Trustworthy machine learning · 78% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 15% Deep learning architectures and training · 3%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
5 papers
Information retrieval · 58% Data mining · 41% Query processing and optimization · 0%

Topics — the 30 heaviest of 36, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › model monitoring
failure prediction
0.112012
Machine Learning for theNew York City Power Grid · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2012
Energy systems and smart grids › electric vehicle charging
charging infrastructure
0.112011
Vehicle Electrification: Status and Issues · Proc. IEEE 2011
Energy systems and smart grids
electric vehicle
0.112011
Vehicle Electrification: Status and Issues · Proc. IEEE 2011
Energy systems and smart grids › renewable energy
grid integration
0.112011
Vehicle Electrification: Status and Issues · Proc. IEEE 2011
Energy systems and smart grids › electric vehicle charging
vehicle-to-grid
0.012011
Vehicle Electrification: Status and Issues · Proc. IEEE 2011
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › case-based reasoning
memory-based reasoning
0.011998
A Probabilistic Framework for Memory-Based Reasoning · Artif. Intell. 1998
Data mining › predictive modeling › classification
decision tree learning
0.011996
Local Induction of Decision Trees: Towards Interactive Data Mining · KDD 1996
Information retrieval
distributed information retrieval
0.021989
Parallel Processing and Information Retrieval · SIGIR 1989
A Parallel Indexed Algorithm for Information Retrieval · SIGIR 1989
Bioinformatics and computational biology
protein structure analysis
0.011993
Automatic Derivation of Substructures Yields Novel Structural Building Blocks in Globular Proteins · ISMB 1993
Information retrieval
document retrieval
0.011992
Classifying News Stories using Memory Based Reasoning · SIGIR 1992
Information retrieval
relevance feedback
0.011992
Classifying News Stories using Memory Based Reasoning · SIGIR 1992
Data mining › text mining
text classification
0.011992
Classifying News Stories using Memory Based Reasoning · SIGIR 1992
Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures
machine learning accelerator
0.011990
Massivley Parallel AI · AAAI 1990
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
backpropagation
0.011989
An Efficient Implementation of the Back-propagation Algorithm on the Connection Machine CM-2 · NIPS 1989
Bioinformatics and computational biology
protein structure prediction
0.011989
Protein structure prediction by a data-level parallel algorithm · SC 1989
Information retrieval
indexing
0.011989
A Parallel Indexed Algorithm for Information Retrieval · SIGIR 1989
Information retrieval › indexing
inverted index
0.011989
A Parallel Indexed Algorithm for Information Retrieval · SIGIR 1989
Parallel and multicore computing › parallel computing › parallel machine learning
parallel neural network training
0.011989
An Efficient Implementation of the Back-propagation Algorithm on the Connection Machine CM-2 · NIPS 1989
Data mining
interactive data mining
0.011996
Local Induction of Decision Trees: Towards Interactive Data Mining · KDD 1996
Parallel and multicore computing
parallel algorithms
0.021989
A Parallel Indexed Algorithm for Information Retrieval · SIGIR 1989
Protein structure prediction by a data-level parallel algorithm · SC 1989
Automata and formal languages
parsing
0.011984
Phenomenologically Plausible Parsing · AAAI 1984
Parallel and multicore computing › parallel architecture
massively parallel processing
0.011991
Massively Parallel Artificial Intelligence · IJCAI 1991
Parallel and multicore computing › parallel computing
parallel machine learning
0.011990
Massivley Parallel AI · AAAI 1990
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
commonsense reasoning
0.011980
Understanding Scene Descriptions as Event Simulations · ACL 1980
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › spatial reasoning
scene description understanding
0.011980
Understanding Scene Descriptions as Event Simulations · ACL 1980
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
spatial reasoning
0.011980
Understanding Scene Descriptions as Event Simulations · ACL 1980
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
natural language understanding
0.011979
Visual Analog Representations for Natural Languages Understanding · IJCAI 1979
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems › natural language interface
natural language database interface
0.011977
Writing a Natural Language Data Base System · IJCAI 1977
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
natural language interface
0.011977
Writing a Natural Language Data Base System · IJCAI 1977
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
causal reasoning
0.011980
Understanding Scene Descriptions as Event Simulations · ACL 1980

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

supervised ranking · 0.3cross-validation · 0.3systems analysis · 0.1susceptibility analysis · 0.1machine learning · 0.1memory-based reasoning · 0.0simulation · 0.0data-level parallelism · 0.0backpropagation · 0.0analytic modeling · 0.0substructure derivation · 0.0k-nearest neighbor · 0.0connectionist model · 0.0shape diagrams · 0.0schema-based understanding · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2012 Machine Learning for theNew York City Power Grid
abstract
Power companies can benefit from the use of knowledge discovery methods and statistical machine learning for preventive maintenance. We introduce a general process for transforming historical electrical grid data into models that aim to predict the risk of failures for components and systems. These models can be used directly by power companies to assist with prioritization of maintenance and repair work. Specialized versions of this process are used to produce 1) feeder failure rankings, 2) cable, joint, terminator, and transformer rankings, 3) feeder Mean Time Between Failure (MTBF) estimates, and 4) manhole events vulnerability rankings. The process in its most general form can handle diverse, noisy, sources that are historical (static), semi-real-time, or realtime, incorporates state-of-the-art machine learning algorithms for prioritization (supervised ranking or MTBF), and includes an evaluation of results via cross-validation and blind test. Above and beyond the ranked lists and MTBF estimates are business management interfaces that allow the prediction capability to be integrated directly into corporate planning and decision support; such interfaces rely on several important properties of our general modeling approach: that machine learning features are meaningful to domain experts, that the processing of data is transparent, and that prediction results are accurate enough to support sound decision making. We discuss the challenges in working with historical electrical grid data that were not designed for predictive purposes. The “rawness” of these data contrasts with the accuracy of the statistical models that can be obtained from the process; these models are sufficiently accurate to assist in maintaining New York City’s electrical grid.
Cynthia Rudin, David L. Waltz, Roger Anderson, Albert Boulanger, Ansaf Salleb-Aouissi, Maggie Chow, Haimonti Dutta, Philip Gross, Bert Huang, Steve Ierome
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.2
2011 Vehicle Electrification: Status and Issues
abstract
Concern for the environment and energy security is changing the way we think about energy. Grid-enabled passenger vehicles, like electric vehicles (EV) and plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEV) can help address environmental and energy issues. Automakers have recognized that electric drive vehicles are critical to the future of the industry. However, some challenges exist to greater adoption: the perception of cost, EV range, access to charging, potential impacts to the grid, and lack of public awareness about the availability and practicality of these vehicles. Although the current initial price for EV's is higher, their operating costs are lower. Policies that reduce the total cost of ownership of EVs and PHEVs, compared to conventional internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicles, will lead to faster market penetration. Greater access to charging infrastructure will also accelerate public adoption. Smart grid technology will optimize the vehicle integration with the grid, allowing intelligent and efficient use of energy. By coordinating efforts and using a systems perspective, the advantages of EVs and PHEVs can be achieved using the least resources. This paper analyzes these factors, their rate of acceleration and how they may synergistically align for the electrification of vehicles.
Albert Boulanger, Andrew Chu, Suzanne Maxx, David L. Waltz
Proc. IEEE4
2010 Patient-Specific Seizure Detection from Intra-cranial EEG Using High Dimensional Clustering
abstract
Automatic seizure detection is becoming popular in modern epilepsy monitoring units since it assists diagnostic monitoring and reduces manual review of large volumes of EEG recordings. In this paper, we describe the application of machine learning algorithms for building patient-specific seizure detectors on multiple frequency bands of intra-cranial electroencephalogram (iEEG) recorded by a dense Micro-Electrode Array (MEA). The MEA is capable of recording at a very high sampling rate (30 KHz) producing an avalanche of time series data. We explore subsets of this data to build seizure detectors - we discuss several methods for extracting univariate and bivariate features from the channels and study the effectiveness of using high dimensional clustering algorithms such as K-means and Subspace clustering for constructing the model. Future work involves design of more robust seizure detectors using other features and non-parametric clustering techniques, detection of artifacts and understanding the generalization properties of the models.
Haimonti Dutta, David L. Waltz, Karthik M. Ramasamy, Philip Gross, Ansaf Salleb-Aouissi, Hatim Diab, Manoj Pooleery, Catherine A. Schevon, Ronald Emerson
ICMLA2
2009 Discovering Characterization Rules from Rankings
abstract
For many ranking applications we would like to understand not only which items are top-ranked, but also why they are top-ranked. However, many of the best ranking algorithms (e. g., SVMs) are black boxes that give little information about the factors for their rankings. We describe and demonstrate a new approach that can work in conjunction with any ranking algorithm to discover explanations for the items at the top of the rankings. These explanations are in the form of rules expressed as boolean combinations of attribute-value expressions. These rules are discovered by contrasting attributes of items drawn from both the top and bottom of a ranking list, looking for items that have high leverage, corresponding to rules with broad coverage and sharp differentiations. We include empirical results to demonstrate the utility of our method.
Ansaf Salleb-Aouissi, Bert Huang, David L. Waltz
ICMLA3
2006 Predicting Electricity Distribution Feeder Failures Using Machine Learning Susceptibility Analysis
Philip Gross, Albert Boulanger, Marta Arias, David L. Waltz, Philip M. Long, Charles Lawson, Roger Anderson, Matthew Koenig, Mark Mastrocinque, William Fairechio, John A. Johnson, Serena Lee, Frank Doherty, Arthur Kressner
AAAI4
1998 A Probabilistic Framework for Memory-Based Reasoning
Simon Kasif, Steven Salzberg, David L. Waltz, John Rachlin, David W. Aha
Artif. Intell.3
1996 Local Induction of Decision Trees: Towards Interactive Data Mining
Truxton Fulton, Simon Kasif, Steven Salzberg, David L. Waltz
KDD4
1993 Automatic Derivation of Substructures Yields Novel Structural Building Blocks in Globular Proteins
Xiru Zhang, Jacquelyn S. Fetrow, William A. Rennie, David L. Waltz, George Berg
ISMB4
1992 Classifying News Stories using Memory Based Reasoning
abstract
We describe a method for classifying news stories using Memory Based Reasoning (MBR) a k-nearest neighbor method), that does not require manual topic definitions. Using an already coded training database of about 50,000 stories from the Dow Jones Press Release News Wire, and SEEKER [Stanfill] (a text retrieval system that supports relevance feedback) as the underlying match engine, codes are assigned to new, unseen stories with a recall of about 80% and precision of about 70%. There are about 350 different codes to be assigned. Using a massively parallel supercomputer, we leverage the information already contained in the thousands of coded stories and are able to code a story in about 2 seconds. Given SEEKER, the text retrieval system, we achieved these results in about two person-months. We believe this approach is effective in reducing the development time to implement classification systems involving large number of topics for the purpose of classification, message routing etc.
Brij M. Masand, Gordon Linoff, David L. Waltz
SIGIR3
1991 Massively Parallel Artificial Intelligence
Hiroaki Kitano, James A. Hendler, Tetsuya Higuchi, Dan I. Moldovan, David L. Waltz
IJCAI5
1990 Massivley Parallel AI
David L. Waltz
AAAI1
1990 The backpropagation algorithm on grid and hypercube architectures
Xiru Zhang, Michael McKenna, Jill P. Mesirov, David L. Waltz
Parallel Comput.4
1989 An Efficient Implementation of the Back-propagation Algorithm on the Connection Machine CM-2
Xiru Zhang, Michael McKenna, Jill P. Mesirov, David L. Waltz
NIPS4
1989 Protein structure prediction by a data-level parallel algorithm
abstract
We have developed a software system, PHI-PSI, on the Connection Machine that uses a parallel algorithm to retrieve and use information from a database of 112 known protein structures (selected from the Brookhaven Protein Databank) to predict the structures of other proteins. The φ and ψ angles of each amino acid (the angles each amino acid forms with its immediate neighbors) in a protein are used to represent its 3-D structure. PHI-PSI's algorithm is based on the idea of Memory-based reasoning (MBR) [10] and extends it to include a recursive procedure to refine its initial prediction and a “window” of varying sizes to look at different contexts of an input. PHI-PSI has been tested with all the available data. Initial results show that it performs better than distribution-based guesses for most of the φ and ψ angle values.
Xiru Zhang, David L. Waltz, Jill P. Mesirov
SC2
1989 A Parallel Indexed Algorithm for Information Retrieval
abstract
In this paper we present a parallel document ranking algorithm suitable for use on databases of 1-1000 GB, resident on primary or secondary storage. The algorithm is based on inverted indexes, and has two advantages over a previously published parallel algorithm for retrieval based on signature files. First, it permits the employment of ranking strategies which cannot be easily implemented using signature files, specifically methods which depend on document-term weighting. Second, it permits the interactive searching of databases resident on secondary storage. The algorithm is evaluated via a mixture of analytic and simulation techniques, with a particular focus on how cost-effectiveness and efficiency change as the size of the database, number of processors, and cost of memory are altered. In particular, we find that if the ratio of the number of processors and/or disks to the size of the database is held constant, then the cost-effectiveness of the resulting system remains constant. Furthermore, for a given size of database, there is a number of processors which optimizes cost-effectiveness. Estimated response times are also presented. Using these methods, it appears that cost-effective interactive access to databases in the 100-1000 GB range can be achieved using current technology.
Craig Stanfill, Robert Thau, David L. Waltz
SIGIR3
1989 Parallel Processing and Information Retrieval
David L. Waltz
SIGIR1
1986 Connectionist Models for Natural Language Processing Program
David L. Waltz
ACL1
1984 Phenomenologically Plausible Parsing
David L. Waltz, Jordan B. Pollack
AAAI1
1982 Event Shape Diagrams
David L. Waltz
AAAI1
1981 Toward a Detailed Model of Processing for Language Describing the Physical World
David L. Waltz
IJCAI1
1980 Understanding Scene Descriptions as Event Simulations
abstract
The language of scene descriptions must allow a hearer to build structures of schemas similar (to some level of detail) to those the speaker has built via perceptual processes. The understanding process in general requires a hearer to create and run "event simulations" to check the consistency and plausibility of a "picture" constructed from a speaker's description. A speaker must also run similar event simulations on his own descriptions in order to be able to judge when the hearer has been given sufficient information to construct an appropriate "picture", and to be able to respond appropriately to the hearer's questions about or responses to the scene description.In this paper I explore some simple scene description examples in which a hearer must make judgements involving reasoning about scenes, space, common-sense physics, cause-effect relationships, etc. While I propose some mechanisms for dealing with such scene descriptions, my primary concern at this time is to flesh out our understanding of just what the mechanisms must accomplish: what information will be available to them and what information must be found or generated to account for the inferences we know are actually made.
David L. Waltz
ACL1
1979 Visual Analog Representations for Natural Languages Understanding
David L. Waltz, Lois C. Boggess
IJCAI1
1977 Writing a Natural Language Data Base System
David L. Waltz, Bradley A. Goodman
IJCAI1