Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Roland Weiss 0002

dblp:w/RolandJWeiss-2 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2012
0000-0003-3092-7846ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 3 · 1 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Requirements engineering and software design · 91% Software maintenance and evolution · 9%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Electronic design automation · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Automated reasoning and model checking · 100%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Requirements engineering and software design › software architecture
architecture evaluation
0.112011
An industrial case study on quality impact prediction for evolving service-oriented software · ICSE 2011
Requirements engineering and software design
software architecture
0.112011
An industrial case study on quality impact prediction for evolving service-oriented software · ICSE 2011
Requirements engineering and software design › software architecture
software architecture evolution
0.112011
An industrial case study on quality impact prediction for evolving service-oriented software · ICSE 2011
Electronic design automation › model checking
bounded model checking
0.112006
Fast falsification based on symbolic bounded property checking · DAC 2006
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
hardware verification
0.112006
Fast falsification based on symbolic bounded property checking · DAC 2006
Software maintenance and evolution
software evolution
0.012011
An industrial case study on quality impact prediction for evolving service-oriented software · ICSE 2011
Automated reasoning and model checking › model checking › symbolic model checking
BDD-based verification
0.012006
Fast falsification based on symbolic bounded property checking · DAC 2006
Automated reasoning and model checking › model checking
symbolic model checking
0.012006
Fast falsification based on symbolic bounded property checking · DAC 2006

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

model-driven prediction · 0.1Q-ImPrESS · 0.1state space search guiding · 0.1binary decision diagrams · 0.1binary decision diagram · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2012 Sustainability guidelines for long-living software systems
abstract
Economically sustainable software systems must be able to cost-effectively evolve in response to changes in their environment, their usage profile, and business demands. However, in many software development projects, sustainability is treated as an afterthought, as developers are driven by time-to-market pressure and are often not educated to apply sustainability-improving techniques. While software engineering research and practice has suggested a large amount of such techniques, a holistic overview is missing and the effectiveness of individual techniques is often not sufficiently validated. On this behalf we created a catalog of “software sustainability guidelines” to support project managers, software architects, and developers during system design, development, operation, and maintenance. This paper describes how we derived these guidelines and how we applied selected techniques from them in two industrial case studies. We report several lessons learned about sustainable software development.
Zoya Alexeeva, Benjamin Klatt, Heiko Koziolek, Klaus Krogmann, Johannes Stammel, Roland Weiss 0002
ICSM6
2011 An industrial case study on quality impact prediction for evolving service-oriented software
abstract
Systematic decision support for architectural design decisions is a major concern for software architects of evolving service-oriented systems. In practice, architects often analyse the expected performance and reliability of design alternatives based on prototypes or former experience. Model-driven prediction methods claim to uncover the tradeoffs between different alternatives quantitatively while being more cost-effective and less error-prone. However, they often suffer from weak tool support and focus on single quality attributes. Furthermore, there is limited evidence on their effectiveness based on documented industrial case studies. Thus, we have applied a novel, model-driven prediction method called Q-ImPrESS on a large-scale process control system consisting of several million lines of code from the automation domain to evaluate its evolution scenarios. This paper reports our experiences with the method and lessons learned. Benefits of Q-ImPrESS are the good architectural decision support and comprehensive tool framework, while one drawback is the time-consuming data collection.
Heiko Koziolek, Bastian Schlich, Carlos G. Bilich, Roland Weiss 0002, Steffen Becker 0001, Klaus Krogmann, Mircea Trifu, Raffaela Mirandola, Anne Koziolek
ICSE4
2006 Fast falsification based on symbolic bounded property checking
abstract
Symbolic property verification is an increasingly popular debugging method based on Binary Decision Diagrams (BDDs). The lack of optimization of the state space search is often responsible for the excessive growth of the BDDs. In this paper we present an accelerated symbolic property verification by means of a new guiding technique that automatically finds the set of interesting variables by exploiting the property and the transition relation of a design. Our property based state space guiding can substantially speed up the verification process. The heuristic picks up the interesting state or the input variables automatically and utilizes them in guiding the state space traversal. This guiding approach is a novel one as it is automatic, efficient and stable for fast falsification. Furthermore it does not degrade as much for full validation.
Prakash Mohan Peranandam, Pradeep Kumar Nalla, Jürgen Ruf, Roland Weiss 0002, Thomas Kropf, Wolfgang Rosenstiel
DAC4
2005 Efficient and Customizable Integration of Temporal Properties
Roland Weiss 0002, Jürgen Ruf, Thomas Kropf, Wolfgang Rosenstiel
FDL1