EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ljupco Todorovski
dblp:02/2847
· DBLP profile ↗
18ranked-venue papers in the field
7as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0003-0037-9260ORCID · reported
Domains — venue-derived; a paper can count in several
Data Mining & Knowledge Discovery · 13 (7 first)Knowledge Engineering, Semantic Web & Information Systems · 4Other / Interdisciplinary · 1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Improving stochastic models by smart denoising and latent representation optimizationabstractThis paper introduces an innovative deep learning-based optimization method specifically designed for data derived from stochastic processes . Addressing the prevalent issue of rapid overfitting in real-world scenarios with limited historical data , our approach focuses on denoising optimization. The method effectively balances the simultaneous optimization of latent data representation and target variables, leading to enhanced model performance. We rigorously test our approach using five diverse real-world datasets. Our study is structured into three parts: an ablation study to validate the individual components of our method, a statistical analysis using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test to confirm the superiority of our method against five research hypotheses, and a detailed exploration of parameter visualization and fine-tuning. The comprehensive evaluation demonstrates that our method not only outperforms existing techniques but also significantly contributes to the advancement of deep learning models for stochastic processes. The findings underscore the potential of our method as a robust solution to the challenges in modeling stochastic processes with deep learning , offering new avenues for efficient and accurate predictions . Jakob Jelencic, M. Besher Massri, Ljupco Todorovski, Marko Grobelnik, Dunja Mladenic |
Inf. Sci. | 3 |
| 2023 | Dimensionally-consistent equation discovery through probabilistic attribute grammarsabstractEquation discovery, also known as symbolic regression, is a machine learning task of inducing closed-form equations from data and background knowledge. The latter takes various forms. Domain-specific knowledge can constrain the space of candidate equations to those that make sense in the scientific or engineering domain of use. Cross-domain knowledge, on the other hand, imposes general rules for model acceptability, such as parsimony, understandability, or consistency of the equations with the dimensional units of the variables. In this paper, we propose using attribute grammars to ensure the induced equations' dimensional consistency. Attribute grammars are flexible enough to combine cross-domain knowledge on dimensional consistency with domain-specific knowledge expressed as a probabilistic context-free grammar. At the same time, we show that attribute grammars can be efficiently transformed into probabilistic context-free grammars for equation discovery with existing algorithms. Finally, we provide empirical evidence that attribute grammars ensuring dimensional consistency of equations can significantly improve the performance of equation discovery on the standard set of a hundred Feynman benchmarks. Jure Brence, Saso Dzeroski, Ljupco Todorovski |
Inf. Sci. | 3 |
| 2022 | Explaining the performance of multilabel classification methods with data set propertiesabstractMeta learning generalizes the empirical experience with different learning tasks and holds promise for providing important empirical insight into the behavior of machine learning algorithms.In this paper, we present a comprehensive meta-learning study of data sets and methods for multilabel classification (MLC).MLC is a practically relevant machine learning task where each example is labeled with multiple labels simultaneously.Here, we analyze 40 MLC data sets by using 50 meta features describing different properties of the data.The main findings of this study are as follows.First, the most prominent meta features that describe the space of MLC data sets are the ones assessing different aspects of the label space.Second, the meta models show that the most important meta features describe the label space, and, the meta features describing the relationships among the labels tend to occur a bit more often than the meta features describing the distributions between and within the individual labels.Third, the optimization of the hyperparameters can improve the predictive performance, however, quite often the extent of the Jasmin Bogatinovski, Ljupco Todorovski, Saso Dzeroski, Dragi Kocev |
Int. J. Intell. Syst. | 2 |
| 2017 | Process-Based Modeling and Design of Dynamical Systems
Jovan Tanevski, Nikola Simidjievski, Ljupco Todorovski, Saso Dzeroski |
ECML/PKDD (3) | 3 |
| 2008 | A Minimal Description Length Scheme for Polynomial Regression
Aleksandar Peckov, Saso Dzeroski, Ljupco Todorovski |
PAKDD | 3 |
| 2007 | Extracting constraints for process modelingabstractIn this paper, we introduce an approach for extracting constraints on process model construction. We begin by clarifying the type of knowledge produced by our method and how one may apply it. Next, we reviewthe task of inductive process modeling, which provides the required data. We then introduce a logical formalismand a computational method for acquiring scientific knowledge from candidate process models. Results suggestthat the learned constraints make sense ecologically and may provide insight into the nature of the modeled domain. We conclude the paper by discussing related and future work. Will Bridewell, Stuart R. Borrett, Ljupco Todorovski |
K-CAP | 3 |
| 2004 | Inductive Databases of Polynomial Equations
Saso Dzeroski, Ljupco Todorovski, Peter Ljubic |
DaWaK | 2 |
| 2004 | Inducing Polynomial Equations for Regression
Ljupco Todorovski, Peter Ljubic, Saso Dzeroski |
ECML | 1 |
| 2003 | Using Domain Specific Knowledge for Automated Modeling
Ljupco Todorovski, Saso Dzeroski |
IDA | 1 |
| 2002 | Ranking with Predictive Clustering Trees
Ljupco Todorovski, Hendrik Blockeel, Saso Dzeroski |
ECML | 1 |
| 2002 | Adapting classification rule induction to subgroup discoveryabstractRule learning is typically used for solving classification and prediction tasks. However learning of classification rules can be adapted also to subgroup discovery. This paper shows how this can be achieved by modifying the covering algorithm and the search heuristic, performing probabilistic classification of instances, and using an appropriate measure for evaluating the results of subgroup discovery. Experimental evaluation of the CN2-SD subgroup discovery algorithm on 17 UCI data sets demonstrates substantial reduction of the number of induced rules, increased rule coverage and rule significance, as well as slight improvements in terms of the area under the ROC curve. Nada Lavrac, Peter A. Flach, Branko Kavsek, Ljupco Todorovski |
ICDM | 4 |
| 2001 | Using Domain Knowledge on Population Dynamics Modeling for Equation Discovery
Ljupco Todorovski, Saso Dzeroski |
ECML | 1 |
| 2001 | A Comparison of Stacking with Meta Decision Trees to Bagging, Boosting, and Stacking with other MethodsabstractMeta decision trees (MDTs) are a method for combining multiple classifiers. We present an integration of the algorithm MLC4.5 for learning MDTs into the Weka data mining suite. We compare classifier ensembles combined with MDTs to bagged and boosted decision trees, and to classifier ensembles combined with other methods: voting and stacking with three different meta-level classifiers (ordinary decision trees, naive Bayes, and multi-response linear regression - MLR). Meta decision trees. Techniques for combining predictions obtained from multiple base-level classifiers can be clustered in three combining frameworks: voting (used in bagging and boosting), stacked generalization or stacking [7] and cascading. Meta decision trees (MDTs) [5] adopt the stacking framework of combining base-level classifiers. The difference between meta and ordinary decision trees (ODTs) is that MDT leaves specify which base-level classifier should be used, instead of predicting the class value directly. Th... Bernard Zenko, Ljupco Todorovski, Saso Dzeroski |
ICDM | 2 |
| 2000 | Combining Multiple Models with Meta Decision Trees
Ljupco Todorovski, Saso Dzeroski |
PKDD | 1 |
| 2000 | Predictive Performance of Weghted Relative Accuracy
Ljupco Todorovski, Peter A. Flach, Nada Lavrac |
PKDD | 1 |
| 1999 | Experiments in Meta-level Learning with ILP
Ljupco Todorovski, Saso Dzeroski |
PKDD | 1 |
| 1995 | Handling Real Numbers in ILP: A Step Towards Better Behavioural Clones (Extended Abstract)
Saso Dzeroski, Ljupco Todorovski, Tanja Urbancic |
ECML | 2 |
| 1995 | Discovering Dynamics: From Inductive Logic Programming to Machine Discovery
Saso Dzeroski, Ljupco Todorovski |
J. Intell. Inf. Syst. | 2 |