Alignments are a well-known process mining technique for reconciling system logs and normative process models. Evidence of certain behaviors in a real system may only be present in one representation – either a log or a model – but not in the other. Since processes involve multiple entities, such as objects and resources performing different tasks with objects, the interaction of these entities must be taken into account in the alignments. Additionally, both logged and modeled representations of reality may be imprecise and only partially represent some of these entities, but not all. In this paper, we introduce the concept of “relaxations” through projections for alignments to deal with partially correct models and logs. Relaxed alignments help to distinguish between trustworthy and untrustworthy content of the two representations (the log and the model) to achieve a better understanding of the underlying process and expose quality issues.

The assessment of process mining techniques using real-life data is often compromised by the lack of ground truth knowledge, the presence of non-essential outliers in system behavior and recording errors in event logs. Using synthetically generated data could leverage ground truth for better evaluation. Existing log generation tools inject noise directly into the logs, which does not capture many typical behavioral deviations. Furthermore, the link between the model and the log, which is needed for later assessment, becomes lost.We propose a ground-truth approach for generating process data from either existing or synthetic initial process models, whether automatically generated or hand-made. This approach incorporates patterns of behavioral deviations and recording errors to produce a synthetic yet realistic deviating model and imperfect event log. These, together with the initial model, are required to assess process mining techniques based on ground truth knowledge. We demonstrate this approach with a conformance checking use case, focusing on (relaxed) systemic alignments to expose and explain deviations in modeled and recorded behavior. Our results show that this approach, unlike traditional methods, provides detailed insights into the strengths and weaknesses of process mining techniques, both quantitatively and qualitatively.

Process Discovery is concerned with the automatic generation of a process model that describes a business process from execution data of that business process. Real life event logs can contain chaotic activities . These activities are independent of the state of the process and can, therefore, happen at rather arbitrary points in time. We show that the presence of such chaotic activities in an event log heavily impacts the quality of the process models that can be discovered with process discovery techniques. The current modus operandi for filtering activities from event logs is to simply filter out infrequent activities. We show that frequency-based filtering of activities does not solve the problems that are caused by chaotic activities. Moreover, we propose a novel technique to filter out chaotic activities from event logs. We evaluate this technique on a collection of seventeen real-life event logs that originate from both the business process management domain and the smart home environment domain. As demonstrated, the developed activity filtering methods enable the discovery of process models that are more behaviorally specific compared to process models that are discovered using standard frequency-based filtering.